Skip to content or view screen version

Poodle wants to chew GM labelsPoodle wants to chew GM label

Vega Porn | 02.06.2003 07:54 | Bio-technology | Ecology

The leaked memos in the Sunday Times article below make totally transparent the basis of the UK government's strategy on GMOs - pleasing Washington!
What the article fails to make clear though is the steps the government has already taken to serve Washington's......
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-699255,00.html

GM WATCH daily:  http://www.ngin.org.uk
---
The leaked memos in the Sunday Times article below make totally transparent the basis of the UK government's strategy on GMOs - pleasing Washington!

What the article fails to make clear though is the steps the government has already taken to serve Washington's cause and how it is being assisted in this strategy by the UK's Food Standards Agency. (see item 2)

The last paragrpah of the Sunday Times piece is also completely misleading about opposition to GM and what the recent Eurobarometer survey showed. Far from showing as it suggests that "opposition may be weakening" the survey showed opposition as strong as ever in the UK with only 10% of the population supporting GM food and only 3% strongly supporting it. That's the extent of Blair's constituency - or it would
be if his constituency weren't in Washington DC.

In Europe the Eurobarometer survey showed 70.9 per cent of European citizens simply do not want GM food while 94.6 per cent of want the right to choose.

1.Ministers try to stop labels for GM food
2.GOVERNMENT URGES MEPs TO VOTE FOR GM FOOD
---
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-699255,00.html
Ministers try to stop labels for GM food
David Cracknell, Political Editor
The Sunday Times, June 01, 2003

MINISTERS want to kill off plans by Brussels to bring in a comprehensive regime for labelling genetically modified food. They fear "negative fall-out" from Washington if they back the consumer friendly policy, leaked cabinet papers reveal.

The documents, including a memo from Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, show that ministers are desperate not to antagonise America, the world’s largest producer of GM crops.

This is despite the fact that Labour has sought to ease fears over GM products by paying lip service to labelling in the past.

Straw's memo reveals that the British embassy in Washington is helping in the campaign to "minimise the risks" of alienating the United States.
He argues that members of the European parliament should be "strongly" lobbied with the argument "made by Washington" that the plans could have "implications" for Africa, where America promotes much of its GM technology.

Straw discloses that Tony Brenton, Britain's acting US ambassador, has warned that voting for the regime would be a "hard sell" to the Bush administration."Our international trading partners, particularly the US, will need to fully understand our motives if we are to minimise negative
fall-out," Straw says in the "restricted"; memo, dated May 9.

In another memo, Margaret Beckett, the environment secretary,
acknowledges that the Americans are "impatient and dissatisfied". But she warns that opposing the European Union plans on tracing and labelling GM will cause "presentation difficulties" -- Whitehall code for a public backlash.

Beckett, who will launch a public debate on GM this week, admits that the UK is in a "minority of one" among EU members in opposing the regulations which, if passed, would see almost all products containing GM ingredients or derivatives clearly labelled.

The issue will pit the United States against Europe at the G8 summit in Evian, France, which begins today. America has already filed a complaint under World Trade Organisation rules against the EU's moratorium on new GM products.

The latest EU move will intensify the dispute as Tony Blair tries to play peacemaker between Europe and America.

The documents confirm the fears of anti-GM campaigners who have long claimed that Britain is under pressure from Washington and the biotechnology industry to oppose a stricter labelling regime. While the campaigners argue that consumers have the right to know, the GM industry says the stricter labelling regulations will set it back decades.

Although opposition may be weakening, 44% of people have safety fears over GM food as opposed to 28% who do not, says Eurobarometer, the EU research group.
---
2.GOVERNMENT URGES MEPs TO VOTE FOR GM FOOD
May 9 2003
 http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/government_urges_meps_to_v.html

The Government is asking UK Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to vote in favour of the GM contamination of our food and against the widespread labelling of food containing traces of GM materials, Friends of the Earth revealed today. The advice comes ahead of the Government's
`public debate' on GM foods.

In a few weeks time MEPs will vote on new European legislation to strengthen the labelling of food containing GM-derived ingredients.

Currently food containing at least one per cent of GM DNA must be labelled.

The new proposals would strengthen the legislation by:

Reducing the GM labelling threshold. MEPs backed a 0.5 per cent labelling threshold at the first reading last year, but the Council of Ministers increased it to 0.9 per cent. MEPs can still vote for the 0.5 per cent threshold, though Friends of the Earth has been calling for the limit to be set at the lowest detectable level (currently 0.1 per cent).

Increasing the scope of the legislation to include GM derivatives, which don't contain DNA, such as oil and lecithin. This would be achieved through a comprehensive `traceability' regime;

Extending it to cover animal feed.

However the Government is urging MEPs to weaken the proposals by voting to maintain the current GM threshold of 1 per cent. The recommendation is contained in a briefing to MEPs from the Food Standards Agency and
Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

The briefing claims thresholds below one per cent are unenforceable.

But the Government's own Central Science Laboratory has confirmed that
a limit of detection of 0.1 per cent is verifiable.

The briefing comes hot on the heels of the FSA's own Citizen's Jury,
held in Slough in early April, the 15 jurors unanimously recommended
comprehensive labelling of any food containing GM ingredients or derived
from GM crops including "a GM logo".

EU citizens strongly support comprehensive labelling, with the latest
polls indicating that 94 per cent back strong EU legislation to maintain
choice for consumers.

Friend's of the Earth's GM Campaigner Pete Riley said: "Consumers have
made it perfectly clear that they want comprehensive GM labelling so
that they can avoid food containing GM ingredients. But once again the
UK Government is ignoring public concern on this issue. It is urging
MEPs to weaken new European legislation on GM food labels and reduce the
ability of consumers to choose what they eat. So much for the openness
of the Government's GM public debate to be launched next month

The role of the Food Standards Agency must also be questioned. It claims
to be listening to consumer concerns but when it comes to GM labelling
it seems to represent the biotech industry. The major supermarkets are
already working to a 0.1 per cent threshold.
---
"European governments should join -- not hinder -- the great cause of
ending hunger in Africa" - George W. Bush

"U.S. aid remains well below historical standards and far below other
donor countries."
 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/oneworld/20030522/wl_oneworld
/118151053610546

"But this is far more than a food fight. In a very real sense, it's the
same struggle recently demonstrated in Iraq" - Dennis Avery in
'Biotechnology, Iraq and the Shape of Tomorrow's World', Center for
Global Food Issues, May 23, 2003

"The principal beneficiary of America's foreign assistance programs has
always been the United States. Close to 80% of the USAID contracts and
grants go directly to American firms. Foreign assistance programs have
helped create major markets for agricultural goods, created new markets
for American industrial exports and meant hundreds of thousands of jobs
for Americans." - USAID website
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBSCRIPTIONS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to the 'GMW daily' list
send an e-mail to  list@gmwatch.org with the message:
'subscribe GMW daily'
You'll receive up to 30 mails a week

To subscribe to the 'WEEKLY WATCH'
send an e-mail to  list@gmwatch.org with the message:
'subscribe WEEKLY WATCH'
You'll receive 1 mail a week with a news roundup
Those subscribed to the daily list will receive the WEEKLY WATCH
automatically

To subscribe to 'GMWATCH' (monthly)
send an e-mail to  list@gmwatch.org with the message:
'subscribe GMWATCH'
You'll receive 1 mail a month with a news roundup
Those subscribed to the daily bulletins and WEEKLY WATCH will receive
GMWATCH automatically

To unsubscribe to any of the these lists:
just mail us saying 'unsubscribe' and specifying which list

archived at:
 http://ngin.tripod.com/nginlist.htm

GMWATCH website:
 http://www.ngin.org.uk

Donations made out to 'NGIN':
NGIN, 26 Pottergate, Norwich, NR2 1DX, United Kingdom
or e-mail for details:  ngin@gmwatch.org

Vega Porn
- Homepage: http://www.ngin.org.uk