http://groups.yahoo.com/group/al-Zawiya/

Heterosexual Society is Under Siege
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(This updates "The Other Attack on Our Manhood" Sept. 19,2001).
Heterosexuals came under attack again last week in many places.
In Ontario, courts created a deep and contentious national rift by granting
gays permission to legally marry. In Vancouver, parents narrowly blocked
homosexual activists from placing their books in kindergarten classes.
In the U.S., the American Psychiatric Association came under heavy pressure
to remove pedophilia from its list of mental disorders.
Newsweek featured same-sex couples attending their high school
proms. "Instead of sparking
controversy, schools are saying, what?s the big deal?"
The campaign to change the heterosexual norm is intensifying. Straights need
to realize that they are under siege from big government and big business.
The majority of homosexuals are good people who want to be left alone.
Homosexual organizations, however, are funded by elite foundations and
corporations to destabilize society by
shredding its heterosexual fabric. I will expand on the reasons why next
week.
Gay activists pretend they are seeking "tolerance" and "equality." But
privately they admit that their hidden agenda is to reshape society in their
own image. They don't care how much harm they do.
"The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex
distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972,
p.11)
"Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded," writes Gary Kinsman. "The forms of
sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially
transformed." (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219)
"In a free society, everyone will be gay," says Allen Young, a pioneer of
the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of
Sexuality in America, p.322)
"In one sense the right is right." says gay historian Jonathan Katz: if gay
and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away
with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most
moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically
transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). (The Invention
of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.) Emphasis mine.

GAY-FEMINIST ONSLAUGHT
Gay and feminist activists find common ground because they insist
male-female distinctions are artificial, ignoring all scientific evidence.
While many heterosexuals might consider themselves "feminists", feminism is
a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but
also the same. Only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is
love of the same. See also "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution."

Today, gay and feminist activists want "people" to make love to "people"
regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behaviour as
pathological. Men are abusers and the heterosexual family is oppressive. The
way to social justice is to abolish heterosexuality altogether. (Isn't this
"hate"?)
Illuminati-Marxism spawned both the Gay and Woman's liberation movements by
transferring Marxist class conflict to gender. The "patriarchy"
(male-dominated heterosexual family) is the root of all evil and must be
destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed
"oppressed" (gays, certain favoured minorities) must be handed position and
power on a silver platter.
The Illuminati's "revolutionary" goal is the "new world order" or
authoritarian socialism run by monopoly capital. It is big government in the
service of big business, left in the service of right.
It always was. In the words of US Communist leader Bella Dodd
the rich sponsored the
Communist Party. They sponsor homosexuality and feminism to "destroy the
bourgeois family" and create "new types of human beings who would conform."
Why have straights endured this attack passively?
1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by claiming a bogus
victim status. Straights can't even defend their own sexuality for fear of
accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism." These days anyone who does not
want to be gay is homophobic.
2) Typical Marxists, they practice deceit successfully. They attracted
widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always
had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in
massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and put them in
charge of education. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in
the late 1940's to admit the government was riddled with Soviet spies. This
was part of the same phenomenon of Rockefeller Communism.

TEACHING CHILDREN TO BE GAY
Many public schools virtually "break the ice" for gays. For example, the
Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral
and anal sex.
Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher's Federation
said the union is "trying to promote a more positive [homosexual]
environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16, 2001)
This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like
"Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads."
On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children's
textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might
be different, live in traditional families, or behave in "stereotypical"
ways.
As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence who
portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of "sexual
harassment" by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now
defined as anything that makes a radical feminist uncomfortable.)
As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be
"uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot
celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate
heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us.
This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to
be 'live and let live.' Now illuminati-sponsored gay and feminist activists
will not let us live.
In an episode of the TV show Friends, Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine
by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and
is stopped for driving too slowly. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop.
The message is that we can all go both ways, even the cop. This is the
reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality". It is no longer
enough to tolerate them; we must become them. It doesn't matter if we are
comfortable as long as they are. (See also Pat Buchanan's "Mainstreaming
Deviancy." June 9,2003

SOVIET-STYLE INDOCTRINATION
In Rochester, N.Y., Rolf Szabo a 23-year employee of Eastman Kodak Co. was
fired solely because he objected to a pro-homosexual office memo. He did not
adhere to the company's so-called "Winning & Inclusive Culture" designed to
promote "diversity." This example of Soviet-style thought crime is not
isolated.
Homosexual behaviour makes straights uncomfortable. Most men find the sight
of two men kissing viscerally repulsive.
Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by
gays denies the children's natural instincts and will probably affect their
psychological development. In 20 years these children will be suing the
government for millions of dollars.
Gay marriages are different from hetero marriages, and should have a
different name and status. They deliberately distort our perception of
marriage. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose is to "do away with the social
need for the hetero/homo division."
In conclusion, it's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in
fierce competition. The gay model does not fit heterosexuals and vice-versa.
There can only be one model. The issue is: will ours be a heterosexual
society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?
Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority?
History has many examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities.
Take Communism for example.
If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists will. When
gay/feminist activists demand "equality," they are demanding that one model
fit all. They are saying that we are the same. We are not.
Rejecting the homosexual model is not "intolerance" or "hatred." It is
defending our natural birthright, and our families.
Heterosexual society is the victim of a most insidious form of persecution,
psychological warfare. The real "haters" are gay-feminist activists, and the
politicians, media, corporations and foundations that sustain them.

"Man is what he believes" Anton Chekhov

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/al-Zawiya/