Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

If you can't do the time...don't do the crime

Little John | 23.05.2003 18:42

YOU’D have thought David Blunkett had announced the slaughter of the first-born rather than a modest increase in the number of prison places.

If you can't do the time
... don't do the crime

YOU’D have thought David Blunkett had announced the slaughter of the first-born rather than a modest increase in the number of prison places.

The howls of outrage could have been heard by an old lag doing solitary on Dartmoor.

The Home Secretary was ridiculed, denounced as “populist” and, bizarrely, even accused of making Britain a more dangerous and violent place.

Go figure, as the Americans say.

In the USA they have no such aversion to banging up criminals.

Bad guys belong behind bars.

The Americans couldn’t understand the fuss about conditions at Camp X-Ray, where al-Qa’ida and Taliban terrorists are being detained.

So the prisoners were shackled and forced to wear orange jumpsuits. So what?

That’s how the US penal system treats all prisoners.

If you’re heading for Orlando this summer and are planning a day trip to Cape Canaveral, look to your left as you drive east on the freeway.

You’ll see a compound which makes Stalag 13 look like Ford Open country club. It has towers, searchlights and tall steel fences topped with lethal razor wire.

The only difference between this county jail and Camp X-Ray are that the buildings are more permanent and the inmates are certainly a lot less dangerous.

If you venture on to I-95, the main north/south interstate motorway, you might glimpse a gang of prisoners working on the hard shoulder under the supervision of guards in mirrored shades, bristling with weapons.

The Americans understand that the primary purposes of prison are punishment and protecting the public.

If criminals are behind bars, they’re not committing crime. That’s the deal.

Sure, they’ve got plenty of bleeding hearts of their own.

But they don’t take any notice of them. And they certainly wouldn’t dream of putting them in charge of the system.

But then American politicians are applauded for their “populism”.

Judges who go soft on crime are soon voted out of office. Police chiefs who dared to turn a blind eye to vandalism, car crime, burglary and robbery would soon find themselves standing by the side of the road with a “Will Work For Food” placard.

In Britain populism is a dirty word, at least among those who think they know best and manage to get themselves into positions where they can put their own prejudices into effect.

Then again, America is a proper democracy in the way that Britain isn’t — and never has been.

Here judges, magistrates, police chiefs, probation officers are all appointed. And they’re there for life.

They are never called to account for their decisions and it’s near impossible to sack them.

They’ve got it into their heads that criminals are their “clients” — poor, underprivileged lambs who need protection from the great unwashed.

Prison “doesn’t work”, they insist.

Well, the logical conclusion to that is to close all the prisons — which is pretty much what they have done in Northern Ireland.

Funny how prison only seems not to work in the case of career criminals, yet is somehow the right place for a frightened farmer who had the audacity to protect himself and his property from burglars.

Jailing still more people is a recipe for lynch-mob justice, they howl.

Wrong.

You get lynch mobs when those we pay to protect us from criminals refuse to do their job properly.

No paedophile, burglar or serial hooligan is ever going to be strung up by a mob if he’s safely tucked up in jail.

Where I agree with the Howard League For Penal Reform is on the need for prisoners to be treated humanely.

The conditions in some of our jails are Dickensian and they demean us all. Prisoners are entitled to dignity and proper sanitation, whatever they’re inside for.

That’s why David Blunkett is right to want to build bigger, better prisons.

If the jail population rises from 73,000 to 100,000, that’s fine by me.

If the scumbags are off the streets, they’re not climbing through my back window, stealing my car, vandalising and terrorising our families and our communities.

If drugs are the root cause of most crime, then it’s easier to get them clean and sober in a secure unit than at a self-help group run by a bearded Guardian reader called Ros.

The size of the prison population is not an indication of the state of our civilisation.

It is a reflection of the uncivilised behaviour of a sizeable minority within it. No-one has to go to jail.

As the saying goes, if you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.

Little John

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Ah yes, banged up to rights

23.05.2003 19:13

Post-war surveys in Germany revealed that most Germans thought concentration camp inmates were criminals who deserved to be doing time. According to Richard Gruenberger's "Social History of the Third Reich", published in 1971, official German statistics did show a steep drop in crime under Nazism, which Gruenberger attributed to the Nazis intimidating non-Nazi criminal behaviour while of course making Nazi crimes state policy, and hence not crime at all.
A relative of mine has a vivid memory of travelling by car through a southern US state in the 1960s and seeing a chain gang. The armed guards were all white. The prisoners were all black. I guess she must be a bleeding heart too...

The Crimson Repat


locking people up in cages- a good idea?

23.05.2003 19:25

People come out of prisons hardened criminals and drug addicts. About 95% of crime is property-related, I think 4% sexual, and then 1% other stuff- and the sexual ones like rape are apparently (psychologically) more to do with power than sex. I don't have any statistics, but I bet that the vast majority of crime is committed by poor working class people. Capitalism is unjust etc and creates the conditions for crime. Whether or not locking more people up will or will not reduce crime (I think generally the statistics say it doesn't), prisons are just another part of society that are bad and we need to get rid of. Obviously its not practical to get rid of prisons in this society, just like its not practical to make society or the economy more democratic or get rid of teacher-imposed curriculums in schools or obsessive examinations, but they're all bad aspects of society that show how bad our society is and are examples of why we really need to change it. Criminals are something that might well be inherited in a (stateless)socialist society, just like massive inequality in qualifications and so on, but in a proper and functioning stateless socialist society, crime will be far less of a problem, and things like prisons or detention areas will very likely not at all be neccessary, and punishment will probably just be being expelled from the community or condemnation or something. Maybe thats idealistic dreaming but as 95% of crime is property related, and to do with the injustices of the current system, I think its very possible.

another brick in the wall


People who committ crimes must be punished

23.05.2003 19:44

And if we don't fine them and/or lock them up, what DO WE DO WITH THEM???

Ideas on a postcard...

Thomas J