Skip to content or view screen version

Congo - The war you don't here about!

Realist | 22.05.2003 18:42

Soon after the 11 September attacks George Bush declared that the US and the world were facing "the first war of the 21st century". He was contemptuously brushing aside a war in which almost 3.5 million people have died. This has been going on since 1998 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in Central Africa. It still goes on today.

Some of the 3.5 million have been killed directly in the fighting. Many more have suffered lingering deaths because of starvation and disease because the war has shattered Congo's agriculture, economy and society. Three out of every four children born during the war have already died or will die before their second birthday.

The Great Powers and imperialism are involved, just as they have always been in Congo's history. In the 1960s the Great Powers brought Joseph Mobutu to power. This dictator ruled from 1965 to 1997 over a country which he renamed Zaire. It was a prized asset during the Cold War. One attraction was the mineral wealth. The mineral belt in Katanga province contains copper and zinc in far higher concentrations than neighbouring countries.

Cobalt is a key mineral for jet engines. The US has no domestic source of supply, and Zaire produced half the world's supply in the 1980s. No wonder a US ambassador once referred to "the Congo caviar" in a cable back to headquarters.

But even more important to the US was keeping strategic control over a huge swathe of Central Africa. Mobutu could be relied on as an ally against the USSR-so long as he was thrown enough loot and allowed to butcher his opponents. Mobutu was allowed by his Western backers to plunder so much money that he became legendary in Africa. When he bought a $5.2 million villa on the French Riviera he asked as an afterthought whether the price was in dollars or Belgian francs.

The 39-fold difference was unimportant for a man with a country's treasury at his disposal. Mobutu stayed in power because he murdered his opponents, and because he could rely on Western backing. During the Shaba rebellion in the 1970s the US organised a military airlift and France parachuted in legionnaires to crush Mobutu's enemies.

French and Belgian troops flew in to police the streets when the army rioted in Zaire's cities during the 1990s. The present war in Congo has its roots in the horrific events of 1994 in neighbouring Rwanda, when around 800,000 people were slaughtered in a hundred days.

The Rwandan government of the time, dominated by members of the Hutu group, unleashed a meticulously planned campaign of murder against people in the Tutsi group and opposition Hutus.

In response to the killing, a Tutsi-dominated rebel movement of Rwandan exiles invaded Rwanda. Those who had organised the genocide and hundreds of thousands of ordinary Hutus fled the country. Many ended up in eastern Zaire under Mobutu's protection. The Rwandan and neighbouring Ugandan governments wanted to smash the potential threat from the Hutu militias.

In 1997 they allied with the Zairean opposition under Laurent Kabila to drive Mobutu out. But instead of ushering in a new era of freedom, this opened up widespread slaughter. It detonated a struggle between regional competitors and, behind them, the US and France vying for control of an area where both believed they should dominate.

In 1998 Uganda and Rwanda fell out with Kabila and organised a military rebellion against him. Kabila turned to Zimbabwe, Namibia and Angola for military assistance. The rebellion split into many factions as the local and international ruling classes fastened like vultures on the rapidly decaying corpse of what was now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Realist

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Ta Realist.

22.05.2003 21:28

I know a fair bit about the Congolese civil war, and the devastating effects it's had. I'm lucky enough to know a few Congolese people who've given me graphic accounts of the suffering there.

And that's because I'm a caseworker helping to support asylum seekers. You know Realist- the spongers you were advocating that we should take "tougher" action against yesterday, you stupid tit.

Jay-B


Congo the war we don't want to hear about

22.05.2003 21:41

Congo is the not the war we don't hear about,it is the war we don't want to hear about, like many other wars raging in insignificant african tinpot dictatorships. Does it really concern us, here in britain what jungle swinging witch doctors get up to in their own countries, no it doesn't. It only is of concern, if there are valuable resources involved and yes there are some very valuable resources in Africa, but these pale into insignificance compared to oil. It would be worthwhile maybe in the future establishing a colony of white people in Zimbabwe just for show and keeping up appearences, to keep the natives in check, so to speak, but at the moment oil is our prime goal. The middle east with its tropical weather, golden deserts, and fertile oil wells are ripe for plunder and many white people find dealing with brown skinned semi civillised arabs much more appealing than scary former cannibals and black faced jungle tribes. The middle east has already an infra structure in place, with many western amenities in place already, Africa on the other hand is wild and untamed vista, ravaged by deadly tropical diseases, such as ebola, smallpox and marburg virus. Club footing it into the depths of african jungle will end in tears for everyone. Can our country really take anymore war displaced, espeacially africans.

Binky old boy


In The Congo

23.05.2003 00:50

Black are fighting Blacks - there are no 'Zionists' or Americans to demonize. If the main premise of your activism is that the West has no right to preach to the rest of the World, then it would make sense to ignore the killings in Africa, or pretend that America is really behind them. After all, when was the last time you or your leftist friends protested the mass killings in Chechnya, Kashmir, Algeria or Myanmar?

Jo


we go further than protest

23.05.2003 08:50

How dare you call me a leftist, I am a nazi for fucksake, and I won't have you insunate that the adolf admiration society are leftist compared to the government maybe. I suggest you look closer to home, and address burning issues close to the heart of british people, instead of wandering about the world, wreaking havoc, and displacing millions of third world peoples who end up on our doorstep seeking sanctuary.

My point is our country is full to breaking point with people, we cannot take anymore war displaced foreigners, so we should really stop causing the influx of war refugees by stopping interfering in said foreigners homelands in the first place.

Wether it be overt military interference or interference such as covert economic war.

Every country has their mindless extreme right wing islamic terrorists to deal with, such as albania, algeria, cheneya, and other places. Should we help them deal with them?, the answer is no. There are many reasons why our western governments don't protest at the massacres by extreme right wing cheneyan islamic nationalist fanatics, one is because we finance and support such bastards in the first place. Similarly in Bosnia, afghanistan etc we financed supported trained and armed the extreme right wing muslim fanatics we see wreaking havoc globally today.

al-ciaeda network


Coltan- mobile Phone Companies implicated

23.05.2003 13:09

"Coltan" is vital for the manufacture of mobile phones, and the Congo is rich in "Coltan". This is an underreported aspect of the conflict, as mobile phone companies are clearly implicated in the continuing hostilities. Also ignored are the mountain gorillas. There are only 600-650 gorillas left in the wild, and they primarily inhabit the Virunga mountain ranges. For years they have been the "Hidden Casualties of War" and a real chance for peace, as members of warring sides worked together to protect them in the wildlife park throughout the various conflicts. They are not traditional "bushmeat" as the tribes historically prefer the lowland gorillas. This figure of 600 or 650 is critically low, especially for a group of primates such as the mountain gorilla, who have similar gestation times and social rituals to humans. These conflicts and the mining for "coltan" have ripped apart their traditional social groups, their native habitat and there is currently serious concern about the possibility of them going extinct. For more information contact:
 http://www.fauna-flora.org/index.htm

Sian Glaessner


how strange!

23.05.2003 14:50

Realist, did you know the article you just posted is from Socialist Worker? I thought they were lying communists?

kurious
- Homepage: http://www.socialistworker.co.uk