Poor call by Palestine Solidarity Campaign
freethepeeps | 17.05.2003 16:08
Whilst most speakers referred to the ISM activists, and offered support, a request to speak by a newly returned ISMer who was deported this week, and had witnessed the brutal attacks on Rachel Corrie was refused.
There was a platform for Trade Unionists, politicians, unionists, religous ministers at the rally today, but the request by a newly returned ISM activist who has a shocking story to tell was refused. requests made by other ISMers to allow him to speak were also turned down.
Perhaps it is time for the PSC to review what it means by solidarity, as issuing words of support to ISM activists from the platform whilst refusing a voice to activists on the ground seems a little contradictory.
Perhaps it is time for the PSC to review what it means by solidarity, as issuing words of support to ISM activists from the platform whilst refusing a voice to activists on the ground seems a little contradictory.
freethepeeps
Homepage:
http://www.palsolidarity.org
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
go tell someone who cares
17.05.2003 17:20
juju
Actually, people here DO care
17.05.2003 17:56
Actually, people here DO care
Are they anyone who your boss at Junior Mossad tells you?
Or is this just another kneejerk reaction from the sort of jerk who actually believes what they read in the Jersualem Post?
http://www.bigcampaign.org.uk/
http://www.jewsagainsttheoccupation.org/
http://www.btselem.org/
http://www.tikkun.org/
http://www.divest-from-israel-campaign.org/
http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html
Boycott Israeli Goods
PSC say your opinion.
17.05.2003 18:22
tr
no shit sherlock
17.05.2003 21:31
amelia
I'll smash the system with my $25m trust fund
17.05.2003 22:09
Rupe the Trustafarian
ISM
18.05.2003 03:54
Unfortunately, they've also done the following:
ISM members acted as human shields to protect Yasser Arafat a year ago when he was initially under siege.
Arafat, in case you don't know, spent the 1960's, 1970's, 1980's and part of the 1990's INTENTIONALLY killing innocent people to make his point that the jews of israel will never be safe (in the 1990's he changed his tune and started playing to the media cameras that he has reformed).
ISM members also acted as human shields to protect armed hamas terrorists when they took refuge in the church of nativity about one year ago.
While hamas are supported by some palestinians who want war, there are just as many palestinians who want peace who are against hamas' methods, since every time hamas attacks israel, israel usually reponds by hunting them down, which makes things more dangerous for everyone.
ISM has also done many good things that don't involve protecting terrorists, but my point is, true peace-lovers who truly seek safety for both sides and advancement in a lasting peace process should be wary of praising ISM.
Hi
"A year ago!!!"
18.05.2003 09:13
Anyway, if you go to the PSC website, you'll find they have a whole section dedicated to the PA, so I can't see how ISMs past (btw Arafat wasn't actually alone in the Muqataa, was he?)explains their refusal to allow an activist with very recent and relevant experience to speak at the rally, can you?
freethepeeps
The Sad Truth
18.05.2003 13:07
Of course the they usually don't openly condem direct action because that risks alienating the activist elements ( the one exception to that would be Lindey German's condemation of direct actions as 'elitist ( - but it always seems to be the case that such topics fall to the bottom of the agenda where there's no time to discuss them or if such tactics are endorsed they just aren't publicised etc,
At the core of this is the sad truth that the basic motivation for these folks involvement in the 'movement' is not to directly promote meaningful and effective action in solidarity with people struggling against capitalism and it's international war machines but instead to build under their leadership a 'broad movement' encompossing the old left bureacratic groupings, liberal NGO's and the various religious based groups. This 'popular front' can be used as a recruiting pool for their party -as was demonstarted on Saturday by the ridulous profussion of SWP stalls with identical Marxism 2003 leaflets (pus Globalise Resistance - recently taken out of mothballs(
this is the underlying reason why there's always space on PSL or StWC platforms for christain or muslem clerics, Labour party MPs and trade union bureacrats but not for people directly engaged in struggle
different drummer
ISM and PSC
18.05.2003 17:22
nodboss
The Sad Lies
18.05.2003 18:21
So the SWP did not organise Saturday's rally with a hidden agenda to use it as a "recruiting pool", they turned up to sell their papers and promote their events (like a number of other socialist and *gasp* anarchist groups)
As for Globalise Resistance being taken out of "mothballs", I have seen them (with a bloody huge banner) on every one of the anti-war demos, at last year's ESF, and on a whole number of other events in the last year. Odd sort of mothballs.
Criticism is good, but informed criticism is better.
Pip