Skip to content or view screen version

for those criticising castro

brian | 15.05.2003 08:18

would be well to keep in mind that Batista had himsel seized power in 1952

Beginning in the 1950's the face and shape of Cuba were altered forever by the Cuban revolution. Fidel Castro and his young rebels provided the driving force for change in Cuba. This is the story of that revolution, also known as Cuba's motion of independence. It is also the story of Fidel Castro, for it is impossible to separate the two.

Three weeks before the 1952 Cuban presidential elections, Fulgencio Batista Zaldivar Ð a former president Ð was running third in a 3-man-race. Dr. Roberto Agramonte of the Ortodoxos party led in all the polls, followed by Dr. Aurelio Hevia of the Autentico party. At this point, Batista decided to turn a likely political defeat into a sudden stunning victory. He simply seized control of the government by force of arms.

In the early hours of March 10, 1952, Batista and a handful of fellow officers entered Camp Columbia in Havana and took control of the Cuban army. With the army supporting him, he overthrew the presidency of Carlos Prio Soccaras in a scant 77 minutes. Only 2 men died in the 'almost' bloodless takeover, and an indifferent nation seemed neither to notice nor to care. By late that afternoon, Batista was firmly in power. Prio fled the country a few hours later. He left the control and destiny of Cuba in the grasping hands of the latest in a long line of leaders. Before Batista's takeover, Cuba's government had still functioned as a democracy. Government offices were riddled with corruption. Still, Cubans loyally held to the hope that by electing the right leadership, a democratic government might yet be preserved. Batista's sudden strike slammed the door shut on the hopes of most of them. He maintained office for 7 years by violence and repression.



 http://www.jiskha.com/social_studies/world_history/cuban_revolution.html

this was the cuba confronting castro. Critics of him seem to overlook this.

brian

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

fuzzy logic

15.05.2003 08:57

so because he replaced a violent, repressive regime, that justifies his? thats bad logic indeed.

it seems to me that he is so intent in preserving his ideology that he will take any measures to do it. the end never justifies the means, in my opinion.

the fundamental flaw in his brand of state socialism is that it entails the complete removal of personal freedom, which is too high a price to pay.

squat


hahaha

15.05.2003 09:43

Castro is an authoritarian prick. No better than bush or blair or any other power hungry wannabe dictator.

me


Brian is sooo clever.....

15.05.2003 11:08

Brian's rationale:

"Look there's this really evil dictator. I know lets get rid of them, and replace it with another dictator, that way we will solve the problem of the last dictator. Only we'll have to ignore the errors of the new dictator and keep on about how nasty the last dictator was to hide the atrocities of the new dictator! Brilliant!! I know lets get rid of the Shah of Iran and replace him with Ayatollah Khomeni, wonderful idea! Get rid of the Russian Tsar and replace him with Lenin then Stalin, how enlightened!"

And i thought Indymedia was a forum for people opposed to hierachies, silly me...

Animal Lover


had to do it

15.05.2003 14:33

Any one who judges Castro harshly misses the point of his historical position. To not be heavy handed in the early stages of revolutionary change would be suicidal for his movement. Especially with a predatory superpower 90 miles off your shores, whose stated aim is to crush you and your ideology. Even George Washington was seen as ruthless in his day. In fact this was why he was retained - he knew how to crush desent as he often did (The Whiskey Rebellion is one example). One day, when the U.S. backs off so will the Cuban regime from it's own oppressive measures. Change is the only constant. And lasting change comes only from within and can never be imposed.

ad


Castro imprisons union syndicalists

15.05.2003 17:06

Just cos Castro is anti-US doesn't mean we should support him.

Castro has imprisoned Miguel Galván Gutiérrez, in an isolation cell. Miguel is an independent syndicalist, member of the National Centre for Union Capacity coordination committee, journalist in the independent news-agency HabanaPress and head of the Colegio de Ingenieros y Arquitectos de Cuba (CIAC).

For the full story see the ainfos website:

Miss Point
- Homepage: http://www.ainfos.ca/en/ainfos11919.html


no animal lover

16.05.2003 06:14

Look there's this really evil dictator. I know lets get rid of them, and replace it with another dictator, that way we will solve the problem of the last dictator. Only we'll have to ignore the errors of the new dictator and keep on about how nasty the last dictator was to hide the atrocities of the new dictator! Brilliant!! I know lets get rid of the Shah of Iran and replace him with Ayatollah Khomeni, wonderful idea! Get rid of the Russian Tsar and replace him with Lenin then Stalin, how enlightened!"

Brian does not say that: however, the US says, look theres a silly socialist democracy, we cant have that, lets get rid of it and replace it with an anticommmunist dictatorship. Eg pinochet. But yu notice, US still supported Batista . It likes some kinds of dictatorships. Its not tha Castro is a dictator that angers the us(or u!) Its castos socialism!
Also castro was out to reform cuban society as as whole, not just restore the status quo

brian


squat

16.05.2003 06:17

castros is not a violent regime.

brian


castro's regime not violent

16.05.2003 10:00

try the link to Amnesty International:

 http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR250132003?open&of=ENG-CUB

Hope this link works.

sceptic


democracy?

16.05.2003 10:06

so cuba is a democracy is it? when did that happen? it doesn't seem very democratic to me, people do not have any freedom of expression or freedom to oppose casto's party. state socialism is no consellation when you are a virtual prisoner.

squat