Police Kill With Impunity in Jamaica
Oread Daily | 08.05.2003 20:20
POLICE KILL WITH IMPUNITY IN JAMAICA
The Jamaican group, Families Against State Terrorism (FAST), has vowed to stage monthly protests to reiterate concerns about the length of time it takes the Director of Public Prosecutions, (DPP), to make a ruling against members of the police force accused of extra-judicial killings. "There are many cases on the DPP's desk awaiting ruling and people have to wait up to five years to get a ruling," FAST's Yvonne Soberssiad said yesterday during a protest outside the Supreme Court in Kingston. "If justice is not prompt then it's not justice at all," she argued. Leonie Marshall, was on hand to lend support to the protest. She is the mother of Patrick Genus, the young man who was shot by the police in 1999. Genus was shot five times -- three of the wounds were to the back of his head. Last week, lawyers representing Marshall had their bid to reverse DPP, Kent Pantry's decision, that no one should be charged for Genus' death, thrown out of the Supreme Court by a three-member panel.
Amnesty International (AI) in a report just released said it is dismayed that the Jamaican Supreme Court has refused to order the Director of Public Prosecutions to account for his appalling decision not to prosecute the police officers responsible for killing of Patrick Genius. "The evidence that the officers extrajudicially executed Genius is compelling, yet the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has inexplicably refused to prosecute the officers involved. By not ordering the DPP to review or explain his decision, the Jamaican Supreme Court has allowed the authorities to continue their shameful failure to prosecute police officers implicated in unlawful killings. This is a heavy blow against police accountability," Amnesty International said. On 2 May 2003, the Jamaican Supreme Court ruled that the Director of Public Prosecutions did not have to give reasons for his decision not to charge the officers responsible for the death of Patrick Genius; did not have to review his decision; and that the body of Patrick Genius did not need to be exhumed to allow for all the bullets to be removed and subjected to forensic tests. "Amnesty International is appalled that there will continue to be no justice for the relatives of Patrick Genius. This case represents a failure of the system. Many citizens continue to lose their lives at the hands of state agents in Jamaica but where do the loved-ones of those unlawfully killed by members of the Jamaican Constabulary Force go for justice when the system of investigation and accountability is so inadequate? They have asked the courts to intervene and support their rights. Tragically, the courts have preferred to support the status quo of inaction." Amnesty International seriously questions the assertion by the DPP that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute the officers involved in Genius' death. One jury, in the Coroner's Court, has already found that the police should be held criminally liable for the killing. There is no reason to believe that a second jury would not reach the same conclusion when presented with the facts in the case. There are numerous reasons to challenge the police account of the killing of Patrick Genius that could be put before a jury. How did Genius manage to keep running when he had been shot in both legs? How did he receive two gunshot wounds to the back of the head, when the first would have killed him and caused him to fall to the ground? Why did the bullets in Genius' head have a downward trajectory when the officers who shot him claim to have thrown themselves to the floor (thereby giving their fire an upward trajectory) to avoid his gunfire? "Instead of presenting the information to a jury, the DPP appears to have acted as the defense and usurped the role of the jury in deciding that the officers could not be found guilty. This is clearly beyond his role and responsibilities; the Jamaican Supreme Court should have corrected this abuse of process," Amnesty International said. The authorities appear to be extremely reluctant to prosecute officers on charges of unlawful killings however strong the evidence is. In the case of Patrick Genius, the Director of Public Prosecutions went so far as to give media interviews where he publicly stated he could not disprove the likely defense the officers would employ, a decision that would more appropriately be left to a jury. Once again the victims of suspected unlawful killings by members of the security forces have failed to find justice in Jamaica. This shameful state of affairs must be corrected by the authorities as soon as is practically possible," Amnesty International said.
Meanwhile, a perfect example of the "speed" of the DPP is the case involving the controversial killing of the seven young men by the police in Braeton in March 2001. Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Kent Pantry claims he unable to make a ruling on whether to prosecute the policemen who were involved in the shooting because he has not received the file from the coroner for St Catherine. Executive director of the human rights lobby, Jamaicans For Justice (JFJ), Dr Carolyn Gomes, yesterday expressed surprise that the file had not yet been submitted to the DPP. "That is unacceptable. I think he (the DPP) would be the one to ensure that the statements be sent to him in reasonable time. So that is quite unacceptable," Gomes said.
All this is against the backdrop of riot police patrolling the resort town of Negril last weekend following disturbances which resulted from community outrage over the death of a 14-year-old boy who was shot by a police officer responding to a fruit vendor's complaint of boys throwing rocks at his shop. Police say the shooting was an accident but witnesses say it was deliberate.
Jamaica suffers from an appalling high level of police killings. In 2002, the police killed 133 people in a population of only 2.6 million. There is strong evidence that many amounted to extrajudicial executions. However, the prosecution of police officers on charges relating to unlawful killings is almost unheard of. Despite numerous assurances from the Government and the Director of Public Prosecutions that there is no immunity for police officers implicated in unlawful killings, the authorities' have failed to provide any details of officers actually tried, let alone convicted. The last conviction of unlawful killing by a police officer was in 1999.
Sources: Jamaica Observer, AI, AI (USA), Sunspot
The Oread Daily provides daily (Monday-Friday) progressive, left, anti-racist, anarchist, commie, activist, environmental, Marxist, revolutionary, etc. news and information from around the US and around the world.
Web Site Address/URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OreadDaily/
Subscribe:
OreadDaily-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: OreadDaily-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The Jamaican group, Families Against State Terrorism (FAST), has vowed to stage monthly protests to reiterate concerns about the length of time it takes the Director of Public Prosecutions, (DPP), to make a ruling against members of the police force accused of extra-judicial killings. "There are many cases on the DPP's desk awaiting ruling and people have to wait up to five years to get a ruling," FAST's Yvonne Soberssiad said yesterday during a protest outside the Supreme Court in Kingston. "If justice is not prompt then it's not justice at all," she argued. Leonie Marshall, was on hand to lend support to the protest. She is the mother of Patrick Genus, the young man who was shot by the police in 1999. Genus was shot five times -- three of the wounds were to the back of his head. Last week, lawyers representing Marshall had their bid to reverse DPP, Kent Pantry's decision, that no one should be charged for Genus' death, thrown out of the Supreme Court by a three-member panel.
Amnesty International (AI) in a report just released said it is dismayed that the Jamaican Supreme Court has refused to order the Director of Public Prosecutions to account for his appalling decision not to prosecute the police officers responsible for killing of Patrick Genius. "The evidence that the officers extrajudicially executed Genius is compelling, yet the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has inexplicably refused to prosecute the officers involved. By not ordering the DPP to review or explain his decision, the Jamaican Supreme Court has allowed the authorities to continue their shameful failure to prosecute police officers implicated in unlawful killings. This is a heavy blow against police accountability," Amnesty International said. On 2 May 2003, the Jamaican Supreme Court ruled that the Director of Public Prosecutions did not have to give reasons for his decision not to charge the officers responsible for the death of Patrick Genius; did not have to review his decision; and that the body of Patrick Genius did not need to be exhumed to allow for all the bullets to be removed and subjected to forensic tests. "Amnesty International is appalled that there will continue to be no justice for the relatives of Patrick Genius. This case represents a failure of the system. Many citizens continue to lose their lives at the hands of state agents in Jamaica but where do the loved-ones of those unlawfully killed by members of the Jamaican Constabulary Force go for justice when the system of investigation and accountability is so inadequate? They have asked the courts to intervene and support their rights. Tragically, the courts have preferred to support the status quo of inaction." Amnesty International seriously questions the assertion by the DPP that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute the officers involved in Genius' death. One jury, in the Coroner's Court, has already found that the police should be held criminally liable for the killing. There is no reason to believe that a second jury would not reach the same conclusion when presented with the facts in the case. There are numerous reasons to challenge the police account of the killing of Patrick Genius that could be put before a jury. How did Genius manage to keep running when he had been shot in both legs? How did he receive two gunshot wounds to the back of the head, when the first would have killed him and caused him to fall to the ground? Why did the bullets in Genius' head have a downward trajectory when the officers who shot him claim to have thrown themselves to the floor (thereby giving their fire an upward trajectory) to avoid his gunfire? "Instead of presenting the information to a jury, the DPP appears to have acted as the defense and usurped the role of the jury in deciding that the officers could not be found guilty. This is clearly beyond his role and responsibilities; the Jamaican Supreme Court should have corrected this abuse of process," Amnesty International said. The authorities appear to be extremely reluctant to prosecute officers on charges of unlawful killings however strong the evidence is. In the case of Patrick Genius, the Director of Public Prosecutions went so far as to give media interviews where he publicly stated he could not disprove the likely defense the officers would employ, a decision that would more appropriately be left to a jury. Once again the victims of suspected unlawful killings by members of the security forces have failed to find justice in Jamaica. This shameful state of affairs must be corrected by the authorities as soon as is practically possible," Amnesty International said.
Meanwhile, a perfect example of the "speed" of the DPP is the case involving the controversial killing of the seven young men by the police in Braeton in March 2001. Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Kent Pantry claims he unable to make a ruling on whether to prosecute the policemen who were involved in the shooting because he has not received the file from the coroner for St Catherine. Executive director of the human rights lobby, Jamaicans For Justice (JFJ), Dr Carolyn Gomes, yesterday expressed surprise that the file had not yet been submitted to the DPP. "That is unacceptable. I think he (the DPP) would be the one to ensure that the statements be sent to him in reasonable time. So that is quite unacceptable," Gomes said.
All this is against the backdrop of riot police patrolling the resort town of Negril last weekend following disturbances which resulted from community outrage over the death of a 14-year-old boy who was shot by a police officer responding to a fruit vendor's complaint of boys throwing rocks at his shop. Police say the shooting was an accident but witnesses say it was deliberate.
Jamaica suffers from an appalling high level of police killings. In 2002, the police killed 133 people in a population of only 2.6 million. There is strong evidence that many amounted to extrajudicial executions. However, the prosecution of police officers on charges relating to unlawful killings is almost unheard of. Despite numerous assurances from the Government and the Director of Public Prosecutions that there is no immunity for police officers implicated in unlawful killings, the authorities' have failed to provide any details of officers actually tried, let alone convicted. The last conviction of unlawful killing by a police officer was in 1999.
Sources: Jamaica Observer, AI, AI (USA), Sunspot
The Oread Daily provides daily (Monday-Friday) progressive, left, anti-racist, anarchist, commie, activist, environmental, Marxist, revolutionary, etc. news and information from around the US and around the world.
Web Site Address/URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OreadDaily/ Subscribe:
OreadDaily-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe:
OreadDaily-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Oread Daily