Skip to content or view screen version

Bin Laden: the Bechtel Connenction

Gulf Tonkin | 02.05.2003 14:04

Another one for the conspiracy nuts... from hardline O' Haraist paranoia sheet, "the new yorker"



THE CONTRACTORS
by Jane Mayer
Posted 2003-04-28


Back when Americans were still debating whether there was just cause for a preemptive strike against Iraq, few arguments were scrutinized more closely than the Bush Administration's contention that there were covert
links between Al Qaeda and Iraq. At the C.I.A., analysts pored over aerial satellite photographs. At the Treasury Department, experts sifted through financial records. At the National Security Agency, Arab-speaking linguists eavesdropped on phone conversations. But, even after Secretary of State Colin Powell put his credibility on the line, in a damning, dot-connecting speech before the United Nations last February, questions persisted about the solidity of the alleged links between Saddam and Osama.


Now there is a new and demonstrable connection, but it is not the kind that the Bush Administration had in mind. In fact, it is more likely to fuel the speculations of conspiracy theorists than it is to put their
fears to rest. It turns out that a money trail runs-albeit rather circuitously-from the lucrative business of rebuilding Iraq to the fortune behind Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden's estranged family, a sprawling, extraordinarily wealthy Saudi Arabian dynasty, is a substantial investor in a private equity firm founded by the Bechtel Group of San Francisco. Bechtel is also the global construction and
engineering company to which the U.S. government recently awarded the first major multimillion-dollar contract to reconstruct war-ravaged Iraq. In a closed competitive bidding process, the United States Agency for International Development chose Bechtel to rebuild the major elements of Iraq's infrastructure, including its roads, railroads,
airports, hospitals, and schools, and its water and electrical systems.

In the first phase of the contract, the U.S. government will pay Bechtel nearly thirty-five million dollars, but experts say that the cost is likely to reach six hundred and eighty million during the next year and a half.


When the contract was awarded, two weeks ago, the Administration did not mention that the bin Laden family has an ongoing relationship with Bechtel. The bin Ladens have a ten-million-dollar stake in the Fremont Group, a San Francisco-based company formerly called Bechtel
Investments, which was until 1986 a subsidiary of Bechtel. The Fremont Group's Web site, which makes no mention of the bin Ladens, notes that "though now independent, Fremont enjoys a close relationship with Bechtel." A spokeswoman for the company confirmed that Fremont's "majority ownership is the Bechtel family." And a list of the corporate board of directors shows substantial overlap. Five of Fremont's eight directors are also directors of Bechtel. One Fremont director, Riley Bechtel, is the chairman and chief executive officer of the Bechtel
Group, and is a member of the Bush Administration: he was appointed this year to serve on the President's Export Council. In addition, George Shultz, the Secretary of State in the Reagan Administration, serves as a director both of Fremont and of the Bechtel Group, where he once was
president and still is listed as senior counsellor.


Rick Kopf, the general counsel of the Fremont Group, which manages some eleven billion dollars in assets, confirms that the bin Laden family invested about ten million dollars in one of Fremont's private funds before September 11, 2001. He noted that the bin Laden family has not
enlarged its stake since then, but he declined to provide additional details about its association with the firm. He also chose not to discuss the origin or the nature of the relationship between the bin Laden and Bechtel families, both of which made fortunes in huge construction projects in the Arab world. The Fremont Group evidently does not go in for connecting the dots. As Kopf said, "Ownership is
private and is not disclosed."

Gulf Tonkin
- Homepage: http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?talk/030505ta_talk_mayer

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

hmm

02.05.2003 14:15

To be honest, this doesnt mean anything. The Bin Laden construction group is the largest in Saudia Arabia and the entire Middle East, so its obvious that they will have links with other similar companies.

don


Why "Conspiracy theory Nuts" ?

02.05.2003 21:59

The Bin Ladens company is masisve and probably has or has had connections with just about anyone who is anybody.
GW Bush(abusta oil) and Mark Thatcher (cementation) are both reputed to have made their first millions in deals with Bin Laden.

I can't understand why you refer to conspiracy theorists as nuts, it must be pretty obvious that elected governments are just frontmen who work for the real bosses.
Banks oil and arms companies and multi nationals are the real power base.Off shore banking and laundering of mafia drugs monies are where the big bucks are. The CIA runs the coke which funds a lot of the covert operations which themselves make good profits for other members of the gang.
The whole global economy is a scam Argentina being a good example of the banks robbing the people of their cash and it could happen anywhere. call it them what you will "old boy networks" freemasons, private clubs they are occult power bases. The Calvi case was not dreamt up by a conspiracy theorits and it took the city of london cops about 20 years to even admit that he was bumped off.
With going onto the reptile cage ......

I would have thought that it would be the other way round and that people who dismiss conspiracy theories with out studying a bit of history are the nuts ..

By the way what exactly is a conspiracy ? I see that some people often use the term "right wing conspiracy theorist "
and "jewish conspiracy theoories" even when the "theorists" makes not he slightest mention of jews ..
or is that just mossad disinfo ...

reader


Transparently Buisness as usual

03.05.2003 14:53

A real connection can be found between Bin Laden and Saddam, although it is more dirrect and it has nothing to do with the estranged family, they have no contact any longer.
What everyone seems to be forgeting is that Ussama offered to wage war against Iraq, thats the connection. He offered the Kuwaiti Despot dictator his army to kick Iraqi Butt just as he had Kicked Russian Butt. He has no time for dictators most are the victims of their own alliance with the west. Ussama hates America with good reason and way back before the Gulf war got underway he gave the world a good reason to stay out of Arabic affairs we did'nt listen, instead we gave him a death sentence and Got a Gulf war and a W.O.T now were broke battered and bewildered. Whose winning US or him?.

Simon