Faked "evidence" against George Galloway
no-war | 22.04.2003 10:57
The Tory, pro-war Daily Telegraph today published supposed "evidence" implying that George Galloway had received money from Iraq for personal gain.
The circumstances of this alleged "discovery" are simply not credible.
Are we really supposed to believe that this paperwork was found in Iraq? The pro-war Daily Telegraph reports:
"...according to Iraqi intelligence documents found by The Daily Telegraph in Baghdad."
and
"In the papers, which were found in the looted foreign ministry..."
There are two main possibilities...
1) The documents were forged by the Daily Telegraph and then "discovered" in Iraq.
2) The documents were forged by an "intelligence" agency (such as MI6, CIA, or Mossad) and planted in Iraq. The "intelligence" agency then told the Daily Telegraph where to find them.
As has already been seen in this phony war, "intelligence" agencies already tried to forge "evidence" about Saddam Hussein importing uranium from Niger. This forgery was revealed by Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency in early March (see below)...
So, it looks like the spooks are at it again. This time they are trying to smear one of the most outspoken opponents of the war in Iraq...
U.N. Inspectors: U.S. Used Forged Reports
By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer
UNITED NATIONS - U.N. weapons inspectors cast doubts on U.S. assertions about Iraq (news - web sites)'s weapons programs, saying Baghdad is cooperating with inspections and that some documents presented as evidence were forged.
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that experts had dismissed as counterfeit documents that allegedly showed Iraqi officials shopping for uranium in Africa two years ago.
ElBaradei, who made his strongest statement yet in support of Iraqi cooperation, also rejected a Bush administration claim that Iraq had tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes to use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment.
"There is no indication of resumed nuclear activities," he said.
no-war
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
sounds familiar
22.04.2003 11:42
The Daily Mirror claimed that Scargill, boss at the NUM and the "enemy within" during the strike of 1984, had received money from Libya to help him bring down the british government.
An apology was printed a few years later, but there was heavy security services work going on around Scargill, as recorded in a recent TV prog about espionage within the UK.
In other words, the paper didn't just make the story up - it was created and spread by the british security services. Its easy.
echo
fakes
22.04.2003 12:15
Keith Parkins
Poor George
22.04.2003 15:38
the price you pay
Truth
22.04.2003 16:14
heather
So true
22.04.2003 18:15
Nothing was true and unacceptable when all the documents submitted to the UN agencies by the USA and UK leading upto this were blatant forgeries or misinterpretations.
ram
more comments here:
22.04.2003 18:30
piet
Homepage: http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=66134
The media.
22.04.2003 21:08
Also it was cool watching that prick from the Telegraph twatting on about how the "evidence" couldn't possibly have been planted by Brit intelligence as no one in their right mind could believe that anything could just be planted in an obscure file in a ransacked ministry and miraculously "found" by a journo. Whereas the idea that a right wing English journo could just serendipitously "find" "genuine" incriminating evidence against one of the most reviled figures in contemporary British politics is, obviously, fair enough.
And has anyone heard the media mention the words "Zinoviev letter", if only to put into context the idea that the security services HAVE been a little, um, naughty in the past?
Jay-B
fuck them all
23.04.2003 11:00
or is that fucked as well?
steve
e-mail: punkfuckinrocker@yahoo.com
Homepage: -
the new macarthyism
23.04.2003 12:49
wubble
telegraph there 2
23.04.2003 19:35
Hmmmm..
pin