Skip to content or view screen version

Faked "evidence" against George Galloway

no-war | 22.04.2003 10:57

The Tory, pro-war Daily Telegraph today published supposed "evidence" implying that George Galloway had received money from Iraq for personal gain.


The circumstances of this alleged "discovery" are simply not credible.

Are we really supposed to believe that this paperwork was found in Iraq? The pro-war Daily Telegraph reports:

"...according to Iraqi intelligence documents found by The Daily Telegraph in Baghdad."

and

"In the papers, which were found in the looted foreign ministry..."

There are two main possibilities...

1) The documents were forged by the Daily Telegraph and then "discovered" in Iraq.

2) The documents were forged by an "intelligence" agency (such as MI6, CIA, or Mossad) and planted in Iraq. The "intelligence" agency then told the Daily Telegraph where to find them.

As has already been seen in this phony war, "intelligence" agencies already tried to forge "evidence" about Saddam Hussein importing uranium from Niger. This forgery was revealed by Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency in early March (see below)...

So, it looks like the spooks are at it again. This time they are trying to smear one of the most outspoken opponents of the war in Iraq...


U.N. Inspectors: U.S. Used Forged Reports
By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS - U.N. weapons inspectors cast doubts on U.S. assertions about Iraq (news - web sites)'s weapons programs, saying Baghdad is cooperating with inspections and that some documents presented as evidence were forged.

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that experts had dismissed as counterfeit documents that allegedly showed Iraqi officials shopping for uranium in Africa two years ago.

ElBaradei, who made his strongest statement yet in support of Iraqi cooperation, also rejected a Bush administration claim that Iraq had tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes to use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment.

"There is no indication of resumed nuclear activities," he said.

no-war

Comments

Hide the following 10 comments

sounds familiar

22.04.2003 11:42

Remember Arthur Scargill and the money from Libya?

The Daily Mirror claimed that Scargill, boss at the NUM and the "enemy within" during the strike of 1984, had received money from Libya to help him bring down the british government.

An apology was printed a few years later, but there was heavy security services work going on around Scargill, as recorded in a recent TV prog about espionage within the UK.

In other words, the paper didn't just make the story up - it was created and spread by the british security services. Its easy.

echo


fakes

22.04.2003 12:15

Remember the 'evidence' that Iraq was importing yellow cake (ie uranium) from Africa, that proved to be based on crudely forged documents?

Keith Parkins


Poor George

22.04.2003 15:38

They are determined to smear the last politician left with a vestige of integrity and compassion. Georgie was pictured kissing a D.U. child victim in 'The Sun' as though this was 'collaborating with the enemy.' How low can these media scum go? No doubt he's a child molestor too, or is that Tony and Jack?

the price you pay


Truth

22.04.2003 16:14

Interesting isn't it that prior to the war starting, Iraq was incapable of telling the truth about anything as will no doubt shortly be "proved" when the good ole US "finds" WMDs, but now the wars over, any grubby bit of paper found on a floor that looks official is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but.

heather


So true

22.04.2003 18:15

Heather you are so correct.

Nothing was true and unacceptable when all the documents submitted to the UN agencies by the USA and UK leading upto this were blatant forgeries or misinterpretations.

ram


The media.

22.04.2003 21:08

It's been fantstic, too, watching the BBC and ITN coverage of the smear, which has all emphasised how difficult it's going to be for Galloway to "disprove" the allegations. I thought the idea under UK law was that the onus of proof was on the accuser, but apparently I was wrong.

Also it was cool watching that prick from the Telegraph twatting on about how the "evidence" couldn't possibly have been planted by Brit intelligence as no one in their right mind could believe that anything could just be planted in an obscure file in a ransacked ministry and miraculously "found" by a journo. Whereas the idea that a right wing English journo could just serendipitously "find" "genuine" incriminating evidence against one of the most reviled figures in contemporary British politics is, obviously, fair enough.

And has anyone heard the media mention the words "Zinoviev letter", if only to put into context the idea that the security services HAVE been a little, um, naughty in the past?

Jay-B


fuck them all

23.04.2003 11:00

but hang on, they showed footage on itn last night of him stood before saddam saluting himn and testifying to his strength and idefatigability.

or is that fucked as well?

steve
mail e-mail: punkfuckinrocker@yahoo.com
- Homepage: -


the new macarthyism

23.04.2003 12:49

after the collapse of the anti-war movement, i predicted that a new mcarthyism would arise, and that it would begin with the most prominent members of the movement WHO DID NOT CAPTULATE. we should watch this case, and any further developments, with extreme caution...

wubble


telegraph there 2

23.04.2003 19:35

Saw an interview with a labour MP on bbc breakfast news who went with Galloway to Iraq and he mentioned that the Daily Telegraph reporters went with them on that trip to Iraq too!

Hmmmm..

pin