Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Left Wing Freedom Fighter

Robin | 22.04.2003 08:07

Man of the common people who wears Kenzo suits and drives a jag..

Galloway was in Saddam's pay, say secret Iraqi documents
By David Blair in Baghdad
(Filed: 22/04/2003)


George Galloway, the Labour backbencher, received money from Saddam Hussein's regime, taking a slice of oil earnings worth at least £375,000 a year, according to Iraqi intelligence documents found by The Daily Telegraph in Baghdad.

A confidential memorandum sent to Saddam by his spy chief said that Mr Galloway asked an agent of the Mukhabarat secret service for a greater cut of Iraq's exports under the oil for food programme.


George Galloway: 'I have never in my life seen a barrel of oil, let alone owned, bought or sold one'
He also said that Mr Galloway was profiting from food contracts and sought "exceptional" business deals. Mr Galloway has always denied receiving any financial assistance from Baghdad.

Asked to explain the document, he said yesterday: "Maybe it is the product of the same forgers who forged so many other things in this whole Iraq picture. Maybe The Daily Telegraph forged it. Who knows?"

When the letter from the head of the Iraqi intelligence service was read to him, he said: "The truth is I have never met, to the best of my knowledge, any member of Iraqi intelligence. I have never in my life seen a barrel of oil, let alone owned, bought or sold one."

In the papers, which were found in the looted foreign ministry, Iraqi intelligence continually stresses the need for secrecy about Mr Galloway's alleged business links with the regime. One memo says that payments to him must be made under "commercial cover".

For more than a decade, Mr Galloway, MP for Glasgow Kelvin, has been the leading critic of Anglo-American policy towards Iraq, campaigning against sanctions and the war that toppled Saddam.

He led the Mariam Appeal, named after an Iraqi child he flew to Britain for leukaemia treatment. The campaign was the supposed beneficiary of his fund-raising.

But the papers say that, behind the scenes, Mr Galloway was conducting a relationship with Iraqi intelligence. Among documents found in the foreign ministry was a memorandum from the chief of the Mukhabarat to Saddam's office on Jan 3, 2000, marked "Confidential and Personal".

It purported to outline talks between Mr Galloway and an Iraqi spy. During the meeting on Boxing Day 1999, Mr Galloway detailed his campaign plans for the year ahead.

The spy chief wrote that Mr Galloway told the Mukhabarat agent: "He [Galloway] needs continuous financial support from Iraq. He obtained through Mr Tariq Aziz [deputy prime minister] three million barrels of oil every six months, according to the oil for food programme. His share would be only between 10 and 15 cents per barrel."

Iraq's oil sales, administered by the United Nations, were intended to pay for only essential humanitarian supplies. If the memo was accurate, Mr Galloway's share would have amounted to about £375,000 per year.

The documents say that Mr Galloway entered into partnership with a named Iraqi oil broker to sell the oil on the international market.

The memorandum continues: "He [Galloway] also obtained a limited number of food contracts with the ministry of trade. The percentage of its profits does not go above one per cent."

The Iraqi spy chief, whose illegible signature appears at the bottom of the memorandum, says that Mr Galloway asked for more money.

"He suggested to us the following: first, increase his share of oil; second, grant him exceptional commercial and contractual facilities." The spy chief, who is not named, recommends acceptance of the proposals.

Mr Galloway's intermediary in Iraq was Fawaz Zureikat, a Jordanian. In a letter found in one foreign ministry file, Mr Galloway wrote: "This is to certify that Mr Fawaz A Zureikat is my representative in Baghdad on all matters concerning my work with the Mariam Appeal or the Emergency Committee in Iraq."

The intelligence chief's memorandum describes a meeting with Mr Zureikat in which he said that Mr Galloway's campaigning on behalf of Iraq was putting "his future as a British MP in a circle surrounded by many question marks and doubts".

Mr Zureikat is then quoted as saying: "His projects and future plans for the benefit of the country need financial support to become a motive for him to do more work and, because of the sensitivity of getting money directly from Iraq, it is necessary to grant him oil contracts and special and exceptional commercial opportunities to provide him with an income under commercial cover, without being connected to him directly."

Mr Zureikat is said to have emphasised that the "name of Mr Galloway or his wife should not be mentioned".

Robin

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Fuckov back to Batman

22.04.2003 08:15

I've got two words for you: Zinoviev Letter

(look it up you dumb copper)

or maybe just one= smear

Ghost Buster


Propoganda I think

22.04.2003 08:28

I'm not interested in personal confrontation, but perhaps a mature balanced response to a subject were a man who has has been one of the figure heads of the anti war movement appears to be a hypocritical liar...

Robin


Another forgery from MI6?

22.04.2003 08:29


The circumstances of this alleged "discovery" are simply not credible.

Are we really supposed to believe that this paperwork was found in Iraq? The pro-war Daily Telegraph reports:

"...according to Iraqi intelligence documents found by The Daily Telegraph in Baghdad."

and

"In the papers, which were found in the looted foreign ministry..."

There are two main possibilities...

1) The documents were forged by the Daily Telegraph and then "discovered" in Iraq.

2) The documents were forged by an "intelligence" agency (such as MI6, CIA, or Mossad) and planted in Iraq. The "intelligence" agency then told the Daily Telegraph where to find them.

As has already been seen in this phony war, intelligence agencies already tried to forge "evidence" about Saddam Hussein importing uranium from Niger. This forgery was revealed by Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency in early March (see below)...

So, it looks like the spooks are at it again in trying to smear one of the most outspoken opponents of the war in Iraq...



U.N. Inspectors: U.S. Used Forged Reports
By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS - U.N. weapons inspectors cast doubts on U.S. assertions about Iraq (news - web sites)'s weapons programs, saying Baghdad is cooperating with inspections and that some documents presented as evidence were forged.

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that experts had dismissed as counterfeit documents that allegedly showed Iraqi officials shopping for uranium in Africa two years ago.

ElBaradei, who made his strongest statement yet in support of Iraqi cooperation, also rejected a Bush administration claim that Iraq had tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes to use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment.

"There is no indication of resumed nuclear activities," he said.

no-war


Your get a balanced response when

22.04.2003 09:03

...when you post something that is not unsubstantiated drivil, and from a reliable source.

You tiny tiny tiny little twit.

jackslucid
mail e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com


Hypocrisy

22.04.2003 09:05

Your right that are the two main possible answers. There is no WAY it can actually be true. We can state that already because er... It is probably a government smear campaign (it always is) not that its an easy get out clause or anything to blame it on outside agencies!

Pro War of course


When it suits me....

22.04.2003 09:20

I'm getting the hand of this Indy Media! If you publish something that is not popular the source you have aquired it from is not valid, a government mouthpiece, an American stooge, an unreliable source and basically it is discredited. How DARE anyone publish something on an "independant" media source that is not fashionable. You'll definatly further your "cause" by simply dismissing information which is put before you that you might not like. The irony is you just don't see the hypocrisy of what your saying! Your immature responses take away credibility from any other issues that arise..

Robin


Well come on then what are ....

22.04.2003 09:59

.. your fabulous sources.

You quote a telegraph originated story and expect us all to fall around in amazment ... well sorry, some of us know full well the depth of stupidity and craven untruths that come from this mouthpiece - we even know who pulls the strings of this institution (see conrad black/hollinger/ADL/Lansky).

You say you have the hang of this IMC thing, well its a little more complicated than repeating what your masters in wapping/washington/israel make up (and haven't you noticed the amount of discredited stories originating there?).

But you may have the hang of one aspect of this info game/war thing - a big lie goes a little further than the truth if you have the loud voice and the thick skin of someone who doesn't actually give a shit.

jackslucid
mail e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com