Skip to content or view screen version

Thugs!

Ivan Agenda | 06.04.2003 11:56

‘Democracy’ in this country continues to defy the meaning of the word day by day as the attack on Iraq continues.

The complete ignoring of the majority of people in this country to not attack in the first place, to the refusal to allow protesters to the Fairford protest a week ago, to the increasingly oppressive methods being meted out by the police in Oxford Street yesterday.

A protest organised by the Stop the War coalition to march towards the US embassy in Grovesnor Square, London, continued after protesters moved away to continue their discontent at Parliament Square. Whilst on route, an impromptu sit-down took place in Oxford Street where shoppers were until that point indulging themselves in the pointless leisure of latest fashions and accessories. Traffic came to a standstill and consumers pressed pause on their credit cards and observed the small but effective direct action.

Having prevented the traffic, police blocked everything else by forming a circle around the protest of one hundred with a vastly oversized police presence. Protesters who were separated from the sit-down saw the aggressiveness of the police as they cleared the road pushing and shoving the people. We were then forced away from the road and pavement into Duke Street, away from the support of the other excluded protesters. There the police increased their aggression.

Police assaulted indiscriminately by hard shoving at maximum arm length, catching one woman flat in the face. At this point I called one police orifice a “thug”, appropriate I thought. We continued being harassed down the road at which point another woman was being dragged out for arrest, as we were tripping over the fallen, I tried to pull back the woman. Here I was dragged out and thrown to the ground.

With my face in the tarmac, I heard a policeman’s voice, whose knee was in my back say “What shall we do him for?” Another voice said, “Affray”. “Yeah” came the reply and “obstruction”. Insult was added to injury when another police officer number 4211 expressed, “I’m sick of you lot, you’ve been doing this for two and a half weeks, you think you can go where you like”. Of course!

Handcuffed in restraints, which contain a solid plastic body, in the middle preventing any wrist movement, I was taken to a wall and searched. Nothing found I was eventually taken to a van after a twenty-minute wait. The officer said as I walked into the van handcuffed behind my back. “Don’t touch anything”, quite how I would do that with the cuffs on behind my back bemused me, so I said “What with my teeth?”

I then waited with two others until another van arrived taking me and one other to the Charing Cross Police station, where all arrested were taken. Outside I was asked my age, to which I replied “32”. The reply, ”You should know better” he said. Quite what I should know better I’m not sure. Maybe I do know better and that was why I was there protesting.

Once inside, a receptionist told me my lawyer was on the way, which was comforting. Despite me telling this to the custody sergeant, he twice asked me if I wanted an in house solicitor, as I would have to wait a long time. I chose to wait.

The rest of the process was tedium until I was told I would be charged under section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986. I looked at the form and found that the Affray charge was dropped. So Fingerprints, DNA and photo was taken by an officer who asked who organised the protest. I asked him if he wanted names and addresses. “No, they don’t let me out much he said.”

I was scraped on the neck Bruised on the eye and forehead, shoulder was wrenched and all in all the police behaved with what I consider to be the norm these days. Thanks to the legal observer for the lawyer and for the posse waiting for me after.

Ivan Agenda

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Stop now...

07.04.2003 10:16

You could just as legitimately add why do you continue with your protests when a majority of people in the UK (55pc today) think that the UK is right to pursue the war?

Paul Edwards


Confirmation of Hard handling by police!

07.04.2003 12:08

i was there too.I was in the periphery of oxford circus sit in.i later was later at the pub and was with six people aged 18 to 45 who were also handled by the police. I can confirm that they were in a state of shock and took some two hours to recover from. When they recovered they too were determined to be back next week. The police achieved nothing by their tactics except for ever more determined protesters.

Vinod
mail e-mail: Vinod99@operamail.com


To Paul

07.04.2003 12:17

Because a poll is not only dubious in terms of what section of society was asked. You gov poll which is where I believe is where you got the 55% figure from asked the question in a certain way. If the question asked was Are 'we' right to go to war based on the fact that no WMD have been proven and no link to Iraq and Al quaeda was found and no connection to the World Trade Centre attack was found. Indeed are we right to go to war as any connection to WMD either leads to the British/US administrations and to forged documents in relation to attempted purchase of Uranium from Niger, then are we right to go to war? I wander how that would turn up in the polls.

Eden


To Eden

07.04.2003 13:15

Yes, Eden, I agree with you. But Ivan partly justifies his actions on the basis of previous polls. He is being totally selective and claiming to act on behalf of the majority of people in this country. He should just state the truth and say he's acting only on his behalf, whether or not he's right or wrong...

Paul Edwards


Paul

08.04.2003 00:21

True I did do the protest on my own convictions. False I didn't base it on polls, that was in your comment to the article. False I was not speaking on behalf of the population. True the march prior to an attack was the biggest in history as I understand it in this country, suggesting a big no from the public.

I am against the war and therefore taking action!

Respectfully

Ivan

Ivan Agenda


The moral minority

08.04.2003 10:35

Why did William Wilberforce speak out against slavery in Britain, when only a minority wanted it abolished? Why did Pankhurst protest against women not having the right to vote? Why did the Order of the White Rose protest in Germany against the actions of the Nazis? These were all unpopular causes at first, until the majority were persuaded differently.

Do you base all your moral decisions on what the majority is said by the press to think?

spanner