Skip to content or view screen version

Sex And HIV: Behaviour-Change Trial Shows No Link

Paul King | 04.04.2003 09:29

A UK funded trial aimed at reducing the spread of Aids in Uganda by
modifying sexual behaviour appears to have had little discernible
effect.


4/4/03 03:23 AM


Sex And HIV: Behaviour-Change Trial Shows No Link
The East African (Nairobi)
March 17, 2003
Posted to the web March 19, 2003
By Paul Redfern, Special Correspondent
Nairobi

A UK funded trial aimed at reducing the spread of Aids in Uganda by
modifying sexual behaviour appears to have had little discernible
effect.

The trial, carried out on around 15,000 people in the Masaka region,
involved distributing condoms, treating around 12,000 victims of
sexually transmitted diseases and counselling.

However, while the trial led to a marked change in sexual behavioural
patterns, with the proportion reporting causal sexual partners falling
from around 35 per cent to 15 per cent, there was no noticeable fall
in the number of new cases of HIV infection, although there was a
significant reduction in sexually transmitted diseases such as
syphilis and gonorrhoea.

The trial results, which were reported in the British medical journal
The Lancet, have already aroused some controversy.

The team leader of the trial, Dr Anatoli Kamalai, acknowledged that
there was "no measurable reduction" in HIV incidence with "no hint of
even a small effect."

But the research team's view is that the spread of HIV was already
declining in the area and the trial might not have been big enough to
detect any additional change.

There is, however, another view which has recently been put forward
which claims that inadequately sterilised needles across Africa have
led to a greater rate of HIV infection than sexual contact.

It is a view put forward by a mainly American group of scientists,
including Dr David Gisselquist, who told the Times of London that
"Results from the Masaka study add to the already long list of
findings from other studies that don't fit the hypothesis that most
HIV in African adults is from sexual transmission.

"These results from Masaka are similar to results published earlier
from a similar study in Rakai, Uganda, where interventions that
reduced STD prevalence had no impact on HIV incidence." However, such
a view is by no means mainstream in the latest thinking on the spread
of HIV in Africa.

Most scientific research still believes that HIV is mainly spread by
sexual transmission and that people suffering from STDs are
particularly prone.

The trial was the first systematic attempt on a large scale to assess
whether modifying sexual behaviour and better management of other
sexual diseases could cut the transmission of HIV in Africa.

In a commentary in The Lancet, Judith Stephenson and Frances Cowan of
the Royal Free and University College Medical School in London
acknowledged that "many people will be disappointed by the lack of
reduction in HIV incidence, despite an apparently appropriate
intervention that reduced other STDs and was implemented on a huge
scale with great care and commitment."

The two researchers suggest that it might have been "the right trial
and the wrong time" - when HIV incidence was falling and when there
were already substantial reductions in risk behaviour.

Copyright © 2003 The East African. All rights reserved. Distributed
by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com).
 http://allafrica.com/stories/200303190482.html
 http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200303190482.htmlT

Paul King
- Homepage: http://www.virusmyth.com

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Sex and HIV

04.04.2003 11:47

Sadly the Western academic world, backed by goverment/corporate money, will always be biaised into looking at sexual behaviour as the main cause of HIV/AIDS, as there is the whole morality issue regarding this, and even today, there are still people who are all too eager to demonise so-called 'sexual deviants', e.g. homosexuals or even people (of any sexualitiy) who dare to enjoy sex.

'Tis a sad world we live in...

Thomas J


missing information

04.04.2003 12:11

interesting, but this article misses out on important information untill this project can be judged e.g. over which timescale the project was carried out and how regularly condoms were distributed and how often and how regularly people had access to condoms blablabla.
Especially if it is said that the sexual education would have had no effect on the new aids cases it is questionable in what timescale the project was conducted, especially as HIV has got a long "period" of several months till a year from the infection till the existance of the virus actually can be confirmed to be in the body, and that the illness takes even longer to break out in an individual noticeably.
Also education can often not be measured in a short term "effect" but more longterm.

ab


Inadequately sterilised needles?

04.04.2003 13:25

ad, you are right in your analysis, but assuming they took all that into account my question is why would so many people need to use a needle? Some countries have up to 40% of their population infected with HIV does that mean that 40% or more of the population uses a needle?? That does not sound rto be the case to me.

I_do


Myths

04.04.2003 13:38

I totally agree with "ab".

It is no myth that condom use can prevent HIV infection. Uganda has, in fact, succeeded in bringing HIV prevalence down from 30 per cent of the adult population in 1991 to 8 per cent last year. It is no coincidence that in Kampala 98 per cent of sex workers now use condoms, a rate which is higher than Western countries.

What really sickens me is the link you've put up which denies the existence of HIV and blames AIDS deaths on drugs. Just go and visit Botswana or Swaziland, where HIV prevalence is 40 per cent. Anti-retrovirals cause AIDS deaths? What toss. No-one in Africa can buy these drugs, let alone get poisoned by them.

Go and crawl back into your world of conspiracy theories, while the rest of us fight this plague.

Dan


ab/Dan: u do have a point

04.04.2003 15:02

I'm not a big fan of the 'anti-retroviral causing AIDS' consirpacy theory anyway, as you rightfully say, no one can afford them in the 3rd world where HIV/AIDS is at its most prevalent.

However, I think a lot of people still say that HIV/AIDS is a self-inflicted illness, brought out by their immorality thought their drug use and sexual promiscurity - it is that I wish criticise.
Lack of proper, effective education about AIDS and religious 'holier-than-thous', who make it shameful to even think about protection, along with the greed in multinational drug cartels greediess in not letting the world's poor have inexpensive treatments against AIDS is the main reason why HIV/AIDS has blighted the lives of millions worldwide.

Thomas J


An old imc thread ...

04.04.2003 15:54

 http://uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=52860

covers some of this ground - heap loads of references.

jackslucid
mail e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com


I agree, Thomas

04.04.2003 16:57

There are many factors which contribute to the spread of AIDS: the position of women in African society, the lack of education and access to condoms, the nature of poverty, the attitude of the Catholic Church and the stigma attached to HIV/AIDS victims. In Botswana, everyone who has AIDS has a right to treatment with anti-retrovirals, but last year only 4 per cent of those eligible had taken up the offer, mainly due to the stigma attached to seeking help. The impact of AIDS need not be so severe if anti-retrovirals were used, but this would entail a massive injection of money, an end to Western monopoly in the production of these drugs and probably a reversal of the IMF-inspired privatisation of healthcare.

The West is too arrogant and greedy to save Africa from this pandemic. I suspect the conspiracy theories and myths surrounding AIDS are being spread by Westerners and their African puppet leaders such as Mbeki so they can escape responsibility for dealing with the problem.

The fact is that 38 million Africans have HIV and will die in the next 10 years. The fact that the West is too busy fighting in the Middle East to care is evidence of the racist and imperialist attitude of Western governments. Africa only matters to them when racist white farmers get their comeuppance in Zimbabwe.

Dan