Skip to content or view screen version

News International Occupation

Mr Nibbs | 02.04.2003 15:33

On April 1st around 30 protesters occupied News International offices on Piccadilly in Manchetser before being illegally and forcibly removed by police.

Around 30-35 protesters, mainly comprised of students from Manchester University occupied News International offices (home of such papers as the sun, the times and news of the world) in Manchester on Tuesday April 1st. They gained entrance perfectly legally (walked in through the door) and occupied the offices peacefully. Literature was handed out to staff, and a good mood prevailed - that is, until the police (scum/filth/cunts) turned up in great numbers. Once informed that they had no legal basis to arrest or remove the occupying masses (perfectly true) they told the informee 'you're first', and when asked for their numbers, names and stations, told the questioner 'you're next', refusing to provide him with the information he was legally entitled to. As a premise to give the illegal removal of the occupiers some legitimaticy, the guy in charge informed the occupiers that he had been informed by a member of staff that some damage had been done to a door on the way in and that if they didn't move, people would be liable to arrest on 'suspicion of criminal damage'. This damage was a fabrication until a policeman was seen to damage a door, once the occupiers had been forcibly removed at great pain to many who had their limbs and heads twisted until they felt they'd snap, all highlighting the illegality of the police's actions.

Rather than be dismayed, it was extremely pleasing to see the police reduced to the status of petty criminals - even more pleasing to note that with all the riot vans on the streets they thought they had April 1st covered but obviously didn't as the successful actions of the occupiers showed.

Lessons learned - use your brains - plan ahead, and keep it secret!

Mr Nibbs

Comments

Hide the following 12 comments

Good for you

03.04.2003 14:17

Well done you've made a difference and stopped the Sun from its pro war stance. How DARE they have a different opinion from you.. god damm it the cheek of it!

Rupert


April Fool's Day in Manchester

03.04.2003 14:41

Well done you lot!! Were any photographs taken of the mob that removed you illegally from the newspaper offices ? I hope you all wrote stern letters to the police complaints authority.....

Keef

Keef


Rupert is an awful name for anyone

04.04.2003 11:55

Hi Rupert!

It's not that the sun and times just have different opionions anymore, it's ythe fact that they are quite prepared to publish unconfirmed military rumours (propoganda) as fact which has happened a number of times already (uprising in Basra, execution of British soldiers, that Iraqis are too scared to talk to journalists (spanish journailsts report few problems!?)). We are being lied to, our "national" press has become little more than a military mouthpeice and the actions of the manchester students is to be applauded

Mister Bigstuff


riotous assembly

04.04.2003 19:38

well done to the brave occupiers,you have the backing of the world against the evil tyrant murdoch - come the revolution ...

jabberwocky


Entry!

05.04.2003 16:29

Entry!
Entry!

Here's a picture of the group entering the front door of the News International offices on Tuesday afternoon.

Patrick Allan
mail e-mail: pag@softhome.net
- Homepage: http://www.thesirprickjaggers.com


what the hell

07.04.2003 06:51

I dont care if you support the war or are against it, this kind of action is unacceptable. This is just as bad as a government limiting free speech.

I'd fuck those asshats up if they tried to pull bullshit like that with me.

Dave


You're missing the point

07.04.2003 12:28

What these people did was to protest the media lying to them. This is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

The way I read the post - and mind you, I wasn't there - they didn't try to disrupt the paper's operations. Note that the original poster stated 'a good mood prevailed'. They merely tried to make sure the staff of the paper heard and addressed their complaints - which is certainly something that is within their rights as consumers of said news! So they decided to do it en masse so that the paper could judge how serious their complaints were - this doesn't sound like armed revolutionaries to me.

I wonder if it was the frustration of waiting for a rotating door that resulted in a policeman damaging the door as he was carrying a protester out.

sheer
mail e-mail: sheer@sheer.us
- Homepage: http://www.sheer.us


You're missing the point

07.04.2003 12:29

What these people did was to protest the media lying to them. This is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

The way I read the post - and mind you, I wasn't there - they didn't try to disrupt the paper's operations. Note that the original poster stated 'a good mood prevailed'. They merely tried to make sure the staff of the paper heard and addressed their complaints - which is certainly something that is within their rights as consumers of said news! So they decided to do it en masse so that the paper could judge how serious their complaints were - this doesn't sound like armed revolutionaries to me.

I wonder if it was the frustration of waiting for a rotating door that resulted in a policeman damaging the door as he was carrying a protester out.

sheer
mail e-mail: sheer@sheer.us
- Homepage: http://www.sheer.us


Damage etc

07.04.2003 17:54

Damage etc
Damage etc

one comment here seems quite displeased about this action, which baffles somewhat. Nothing was damaged and the mood was good, the protesters went and handed leaflets to staff. And we're talking about a News International office, people who make money from selling lies and maintaining idiocy.
Any damaged caused was caused by the police.

Patrick Allan
mail e-mail: pag@softhome.net
- Homepage: http://www.thesirprickjaggers.com


180 Murdoch publications ALL against the war

07.04.2003 21:01

180 Murdoch publications around the world are ALL against the war. Do you think this is a coincidence? What do you think the effects of this bias are on the many millions who rely on Murdoch publications and TV stations for their understanding of the world?

anon


Brilliant!

07.04.2003 22:19

Thank you for taking a stand. Back at the ranch it's a perverse situation (cattle jokes aside)...I personally know no one who supports this asinine attempt at world domination. Yet our voice is *not* heard.

I used to wonder why the Germans "did nothing" when Hitler rose to power...and now I know.

How fucked is that?!

Switch
mail e-mail: mountainlover@myrealbox.com


Getting Behind Sueing our Government

09.04.2003 12:13

The people know that the UK and US Governments are Criminal. The UK people know that the media is controlled by the rich who have vested self-interests in the Government, Military and Oil Companies. The people would be well served by uniting behind the White Ribbons for Peace (Mark Thomas), take Blair to Court for War Crimes, movement. Only through massive public pressure will this occur.

Violence is unacceptable from any quarter. Violence is ignorant. The ignorant are not qualified to be in positions of authority in any country, Peace is a Human Right!

Peace!

P.S Please sign the "I Stand for Peace and Justice" form at www.zmag.org

O. Melchizedek
mail e-mail: memnosis118@yahoo.co.uk