Skip to content or view screen version

Economics not morals justify war

Simon Willace | 02.04.2003 00:09

You will not complain when the wealth trickles down to fill your pockets

The problem with conspiracy theories is that authorities conspire to undermine the conspiracies, that question their motives as they conspire to rule.

To Conspire means to plan, plot or scheme, nothing sinister, it is part of the normal workings of Government and business.

It’s only placed into a bad light when the motivation is for the benefit of the few.

The west uses more resorces than the rest of the world, there are fewer of us who enjoy the wealth and comforts, therfore those weaker than us are exploited or causulties of war.

Topic
Beefing up conspiracies.

This is a way to explain how rather nasty things are done without our support for the greater ecconomic good

Here’s the formula… Mad Cow disease = beef industry collapse + foot and mouth + genocide of British beef + compensation = healthy beef industry.

Here’s the story…

1990…The British beef industry was dead, although the beef seemed healthy, it had no outward signs of disease before slaughter and then there was a only a small chance of finding infected meat before the chopped up remains of the big eyed beasty arrived on the supermarket shelves . The British publics were scared, the worlds red meat buyers were refusing imports from the UK and checking their own stocks. Countries far and wide protected their populations from the risk of infection. By this time the transferred disease received an eastern European name to make it sound more human but the association with bovines and the images of staggering cows and the bed ridden afflicted became synonymous with red meat, most people went vegan and who could blame them?
Imagine the reaction of the department of agriculture at the time, it was their management, which allowed the disease to develop, and the idea that such a problem would occur had not occurred to them and as a result a killer disease was endemic not only to the beef but also the British public.
There was no enforcement of extermination as there was no proof of infection and farmers had Millions tied up in breeds and blood lines, voluntary slaughter was out of the question, breeding the disease out of the herd impossible. No one knew what to do, except hope and pray for a cure. However what worth have cattle when no one wants to buy them? the export trade was dead and the local trade scared away.

Department of Agriculture solution…

Take live culture of foot and mouth (available from any animal research facility) Infect cattle and transport in horse float, up and down the country stopping and allowing the cows to wander frequently. Although this was probably unnecessary as a few cases in or around all counties was all that was required.

You may think this action is rather daft, but it’s genius. The cattle were worthless, the industry buggered. Better off dead cows than Mad ones and using establish cattle disease control of F+M and the legislated compensations to reimburse farmers the world can breath a collected sigh of relief. Resulting in the breeders back in business with healthy strains of breeding stock financed by the British taxpayer thank you very much.


Hey ho and now to crack the war conspiracy can't be hard!.

Formula… Depleted local stocks of Oil + 70% economic dependency upon oil x western ecconomicaly driven world population 3.5 Billion plus + single multilateral economic model of interdependent nations each dependent upon trickle down economics of the consumerist dynamic = exhaustion of local resorces = Resource wars

Here’s the story

Over many decades the west has encouraged inter Middle Eastern conflict, maintaining an environment of brinkmanship, one up man ship between nations in the region. Western influence Encouraged one nation to fight another, supplying weapons to each and standing back until the west were seen as the sensible and stable one in comparison to the frequent wars witnessed.
All the while Making sure to Provide one nation in the region with WMD as deterrents to guarantee one strategically placed Anglo/ Jewish colonial Dominion and maintain aggression by with holding evidence of alternatives to war from all parties.
Proven… a list of alternatives to war (1) can be seen in the encouragement and supply of armaments and intelligence to the Iraq v Iran war. And (2) later the disclosure to America of Iraqi plans to invade Kuwait, in receipt of disclosure the US replied with encouragement. And finally (3) The artful and creative defaming of Ussama Bin Laden, who prior to the attack on his name, was and still is the bravest freedom fighter on the planet. Ossama as he was renamed offered his considerable expertise and fighting force to the King of Saudi Arabia, he was already worried that America would use the regional conflict as an excuse to invade and remain. His army was keen and willing and represented a victorious fighting force, after Russia, Iraq posed no threat at all, and the objective was only to defend Kuwait after all.
However none of the alternatives to war would lead the US to control oil.
But to turn Ossama into a terrorist, push Saudi Arabia and Kuwait into debt slaves all will eventually lead to Oil control and the ruin of OPEC.
War on terror = replacement and equal financial cost as old Cold war.
Gulf war paid for by Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
War on Iraq paid for by Iraq
Armaments sold by US, Used By US and Bought by those under its control and or attack (1000 cruze = 1billion dollars + labor and installation).
Iraqi oil = future US supply with Iranian Oil in reserve for when that runs out and Afghanistan to be the region for 2.5 thousand kilometer pipeline for the Stani oil from the north to Pakistan in the south.

All done with or without your support but I’ll hear no complaints when the economic benefits trickle down into your pockets.

One final thing,

Formula… 70% economic dependency upon oil x growing industrialization + Globalization = wars + accelerated Global Warming = dead planet

Solution… Solar, geothermal, wind, tide and bio-oils = Self sufficiency = devaluation of fossil fuels = removal of wealth from Muslim nations = removal of threat = removal of western interest = peace = decreased threat of environmental catastrophe = Future

Thankyou for your time.

Simon Willace

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Solution — andyC
  2. revolving — Jon Wood