Skip to content or view screen version

Blair prepares an escape hatch.. too late.

A. Blinkin | 31.03.2003 02:02

The rift now in USUK re UN involvement post-conflict is the escape hatch. But it will be too late, he wants out but the damage is done already to the standing of the UK in the international community, in trade relations with the rest of the world.

 http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp
"28/03/2003 11:00Prime Minister Tony Blair has stated that the UN has got to be 'closely involved' in the process of reconstructing Iraq. He said that it is in everyone's interest that it happens. He also spoke of Britain and America's 'complete determination' to move ahead with the Middle East Peace Process following talks with President Bush at Camp David."
Having to scramble for an escape hatch at this late date points to the fact that the level of "advice" to the PM equates with the copy and paste effort of the failed PhD. "security" report. It points to Blair not having been informed of the PNAC/Perle agenda of "rolling back Syria", with Iraq as only the start of this insane idea concocted with US arms and oil profits in mind.
The attack by proxy troops aligns with Perle's vision of rebuilding Zion.
Here it is in the words of his own committee (IASPS)...

 http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm

"A Clean Break:
A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

Following is a report prepared by The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies’ "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000." The main substantive ideas in this paper emerge from a discussion in which prominent opinion makers, including Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser participated. The report, entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," is the framework for a series of follow-up reports on strategy.

Israel has a large problem. Labor Zionism, which for 70 years has dominated the Zionist movement, has generated a stalled and shackled economy. Efforts to salvage Israel’s socialist institutions—which include pursuing supranational over national sovereignty and pursuing a peace process that embraces the slogan, "New Middle East"—undermine the legitimacy of the nation and lead Israel into strategic paralysis and the previous government’s "peace process." That peace process obscured the evidence of eroding national critical mass— including a palpable sense of national exhaustion—and forfeited strategic initiative. The loss of national critical mass was illustrated best by Israel’s efforts to draw in the United States to sell unpopular policies domestically, to agree to negotiate sovereignty over its capital, and to respond with resignation to a spate of terror so intense and tragic that it deterred Israelis from engaging in normal daily functions, such as commuting to work in buses. ..............

...................................


TEXT:

We must distinguish soberly and clearly friend from foe. We must make sure that our friends across the Middle East never doubt the solidity or value of our friendship.
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq. This has triggered a Jordanian-Syrian rivalry to which Asad has responded by stepping up efforts to destabilize the Hashemite Kingdom, including using infiltrations. Syria recently signaled that it and Iran might prefer a weak, but barely surviving Saddam, if only to undermine and humiliate Jordan in its efforts to remove Saddam.

But Syria enters this conflict with potential weaknesses: Damascus is too preoccupied with dealing with the threatened new regional equation to permit distractions of the Lebanese flank. And Damascus fears that the 'natural axis' with Israel on one side, central Iraq and Turkey on the other, and Jordan, in the center would squeeze and detach Syria from the Saudi Peninsula. For Syria, this could be the prelude to a redrawing of the map of the Middle East which would threaten Syria's territorial integrity.

Since Iraq's future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq, including such measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon.

Most important, it is understandable that Israel has an interest supporting diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey’s and Jordan’s actions against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite.

King Hussein may have ideas for Israel in bringing its Lebanon problem under control. The predominantly Shia population of southern Lebanon has been tied for centuries to the Shia leadership in Najf, Iraq rather than Iran. Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein" .............etc

The lack of an unbiased press has allowed the USUK people to be fooled into this agenda. The truth will come out soon enough.
How many Tim Mcveaghs will come home this time?
You could help restore sanity and sane dialogue as a mean to peacefully solving international and national differences by emailing this item to your MP ASAP.
Find them here..
 http://www.locata.co.uk/commons/



A. Blinkin
- Homepage: http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. The poodle's master's puppet master: Sharon — Ioni