Skip to content or view screen version

Last night's Cardiff protest

Vashti | 28.03.2003 13:15

One week on, the war's still wrong!
What happened on Thursday night in Cardiff.

Anti-war protestors once again disrupted Cardiff city centre on Thursday evening. Despite the pleas of the local police, a two-hour sit-in blocked first one half and then all of Kingsway, besides the castle. The protest was eventually peacefully dispersed by members of the Stop the War Coalition, although some arrests for "public disturbance" (getting in the way of a police van, and refusing to move on when asked) were made.

Although most of the protestors were students, people of all ages were present. The atmosphere was loud and enthusiastic, with drumming, dancing, football, painted children, and even a dancing Tony Blair with a mock missile labelled "Toys R Us". Pale orange, the sun shone down onto white crocuses through clouds that looked like smoke.

Approximately 50 people marched from the steps of the student union, after some initial police objections. The police requested prior notification of future protests, and pointed out that we should be sure to obey relevent health and safety legislation. Eventually the subdued student gathering was allowed to proceed, to the cheers of schoolchildren at a local theatre. Shouting "one week on, the war's still wrong!", they followed a police officer along Park Place and Queen Street to meet the smaller group at the Nye Bevan statue.

The protest began as a gathering around the statue. Trails of bird shit ran down the face of the NHS founder. At first, the loudest shouts came from a Christian preacher, but he was soon drowned out by anti-war chants. More and more people joined the protest, until roughly 300-400 people were present. A US flag was tied to the statue and burned - or rather, half-heartedly melted, since it was plastic. This probably got the loudest shouts from the crowd.

After around 20 minutes, the protest surged towards Kingsway, where a sit-in blocked one half of the road. The police tried to restrain people, but were ultimately unsuccessful and withdrew. They did, however, seem to have learned from their mistakes of the previous week - the sit-in was mostly allowed to proceed without the interference and phony ambulances that had been seen last time. The senior officer present intermittently wandered the crowd pleading with people to move, and many of the police present appeared to be the same ones who participated in the clashes of last week.

Ten minutes later, as nervous civil servants picked their way through the protest and curious onlookers lined the street, the other half of the street was blocked. There was no significant police intervention, although the CCTV camera above probably hadn't seen so much exercise in years. It moved up, down and around for the length of the sit-in.

At 6:30, large groups of police broke off and left around all the routes that could be taken if the protest chose to move. Only two or three were left as a visible presence, but there could be no doubt that there were significant numbers waiting in the wings. It was at this point that the protest headed west to the next junction. Some passersby made their anger felt; one driver tried to drive into a protester, and a pedestrian tore up a poster and shouted "fucking fascists" at the mainly left-wing crowd before being distracted by two policemen.

At the request of the police, members of Stop the War tried to persuade the crowd to move back to Kingsway, but were shouted down. A police van drove alongside (not through) the protest, and was blocked by a number of protesters who were then mobbed and arrested by police. One woman screamed as she was held down by several officers twice her size and forcibly handcuffed. As she was taken away, the senior officer present protested that he was doing his best. In response to accusations of undue force, he said that all the events were on camera and would be looked into.

As people began to calm down, another protester made an announcement to the effect that if the protest did not move, there would be more arrests and more violence. The subsequent announcement that people should move to the police station to support those who had been taken away was more well taken, and virtually everyone moved back down Kingsway and around the corner.

Two men remained in the box junction. Five or six police officers surrounded them and attempted to persuade them to move, using such arguments as "there's no demonstration left to be a part of", and "you're allowed to peacefully demonstrate, but we want you to do it on the pavement". The two protesters calmly stated their intention to stay where they were until 7pm. With two minutes to go, and without violence, they were dragged away to a police van for disturbance and causing an obstruction.

The bulk of the protest had halted or been halted at Kingsway, and the sit-in had resumed. It was announced that the police would begin moving people on again in ten minutes' time.

The protest was then dispersed by members of STWC.

Vashti

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

on whose side is the STWC ?

28.03.2003 13:46

once again, it becomes clear that many closet imperialists are WITHIN the "anti-war" movement. what on earth does the STWC think it will achieve by acting for the coppers, dispersing demos ? its obvious that their tactics of appealing to the residual "old" Labour sentiments still around have FAILED to prevent this war, and the recent massive 1 million plus march has not been put to best use. cant the STWC see that there seems to be NO POINT in stewarding protests now ?
as for the prevailing mood, clare short exemplifies the Labour attiude to imperialist war.

fubbellub


fight the power

28.03.2003 14:04

yes, sit down in the road! its so much more effective than marching!

kambei


a better view...

28.03.2003 14:12

It wasn't just that one woman was held down and forcibly handcuffed. Other people there were laid into by police batons and some were arrested for affray - a ludicrous charge when it was clearly only the police who had behaved in a threatening and violent way.

The only thing anyone had done was blockading a road, and everybody on the demonstration was as guilty of that as the ones who were arrested. Of course, the fact that some of the first to be targetted by the police were Anarchists is entirely co-incidental.

Police apparently described the 'clash' as a 'pity' in what 'otherwise' was a peaceful protest. Oh, the politics of language! What they meant was that it was an 'assault' that was 'deliberate' on 'wholly' peaceful protesters.


See  http://uk.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=60014&group=webcast

for report other indymedia report.

la la


STWC propaganda

28.03.2003 14:22

F.F Sake, the STWC even have to write their own version of events when a perfectly acceptable story has been written. Are there no depths....

 http://uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=60014&group=webcast

bozavine


oi

28.03.2003 16:06

Hey, I'm not affiliated with the STWC. :p

Vashti


re STWC

28.03.2003 17:33

I'm sure there are some very decent minded individuals within the STWC, people who do not approve at the tactics exhibited last night, but they sure don't seem to hold much sway in the Cardiff STWC.

There is no doubt that they deliberately undermined effective civil disobedience last night, which is a really shitty thing to do, especially as the whole thing was going so well. We are not going to challenge US/UK warmongering by standing politely on pavements, or by simply 'moving on' when the police ask us to.

Personally I just feel too angry at what we are inflicting on Iraq (and elsewhere in the world) to limit what I'm doing to passive protest. Quite honestly, every time I read another report of kids with their stomachs pulled apart by shrapnel wounds, well, I can't say, in such polite company, what I really feel like doing.

But then again, I'm just another 'mindless' troublemaker/anarchist 'infiltrator', so what do I know.

PS Sorry, Vashti, if you have been unfairly labelled as STWC. I would be extremely unhappy if that happened to me!!

la la


further comment

28.03.2003 19:49

Yeah, the article isn't really intended to be either pro- or anti-STWC. I hoped it would come across as vaguely disapproving, if anything - clearly I still need much practice. :) I didn't mean it as an opinion piece, though. I was surprised at the STWC people, who seemed to have missed the point almost as much as the police who were banging on about health and safety ... I believe that we urgently need to be heard, and that won't be achieved by parcelling our voices up into nice bite-sized ignorable chunks.

The reason I didn't comment further on the police actions, btw, was that from where I was stood I simply didn't have a very good view; by the time I got close enough to make out what was going on, virtually everyone had been removed to the van. I've done enough knocking of the mass media's haste to report rumour as fact not to want to do the same myself, so I'm happy to leave reports of things like this to people like la la (thanks, btw) who actually witnessed it firsthand.

Vashti


Health and Safety

28.03.2003 20:19

I was gonna say, maybe put a bag over the cctv camera next time but since the cops attacked you maybe the footage will come in handy.

I was curious about cops reminding you about health and safety laws - if they do that again, ask if they mean the Health and Safety at Work Act - and mention that you are not 'at work'.
seriously - i think that law only applies if you are 'employed' for some task (even as an unpaid volunteer). as an autonomous protester you are not required to wear hi-visibility clothing when sitting down in a road, but the police are required to wear bright yellow jackets while they close the road around you.

bobby


same time next week?

30.03.2003 09:47

Calls have gone out for another stop the war protest next week. Would be really great to keep the thing going. It takes some comittment to turn up week after week, but ff sake, surely you only have to look at the telly pictures of yet another grieving parent or mashed up kid to get the energy to do it all again.

So - NEXT THURSDAY, 3rd APRIL, 5pm.

(for those whose bail conditions from last Thursday don't ban them from the city centre, that is)!!

la la