Skip to content or view screen version

Continue the corporate media net blockade!

Jane Doe | 24.03.2003 09:50

A re-post from IMC New York about the corporate media net blockade

Greetings from Los Angeles!

On Saturday, we marched on CNN to thank them for their fair and unbiased coverage of the war in Iraq. NOT. They suck and we reminded them of that fact.

Help us keep the pressure on with the following re-post from IMC New York; how to continue the corporate media blockade on-line. It's easy!

 http://nyc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=52200&group=webcast

P.S. Please ignore the (lying) polls that claim a majority of Americans support the war. We don't. We REALLY don't.

Jane Doe

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

I think this is a bad idea

24.03.2003 09:55

We are far more vunerable to DDoS attacks than the owners of CNN, AOL/Time Warner, we cannot afford the bandwidth that they have, to win a DDoS war the one with the most bandwidth wins.

If you don't know what a Distributed Denial of Service attack is try this Google:

 http://www.google.com/search?q=DDoS

Chris


re:..bad idea..

24.03.2003 10:18

Chris, when you say "We are far more vunerable to DDoS attacks" I assume you mean Indymedia. Yes Indymedia is more vunerable but I don't think it is likely to get hit. It takes a fair amount of people to gets a DDoS together and I'm not convinced that the pro-war people have the co-ordination or the know how.


There are massive amounts of people anti-war and co-ordinated, I have yet to see a popular pro-war site with the same kind of determination and diversity that the anti-war groups have.

bob


No DDoS is good like no Spam is good

24.03.2003 11:25

There has been a debate on the global tech list in the last couple of weeks about activist spam (can't link to it now since the global mailman box is down) and the comclusion, correct IMHO, was that basically spam is spam and activists should get blocked for spamming the same as everybody else.

I think the same thing applies to DDoS attacks -- a DDoS is a DDoS for whatever reasons it is being done.

Chris


spam is spam and war is war...

24.03.2003 15:13

Sorry, not even close to convincing me to quit it mate.
The implied similarity to spam is (in my opinion) totally irrelevant.
DDoS scripts are still a valid form of protest.
It works. It stops them spreading propaganda for a while.
I don't have a problem with that.

bob


Haven't I heard somewhere?

24.03.2003 21:28

All's fair in Love and War? Right?
DDoS on!!!! If we can't be heard, if OUR rights are stripped, what choice is left, to lay down and die? I don't think so.
I'll see you in the streets again and won't stop untill Amerika stops it's Konservative Kristian Koalition mentality.

Lost in Amerika,

Whabbit

sillywhabbit


Definitely a bad idea

25.03.2003 14:28

Of course DDoS is a bad idea, it can have side effects such as bringing down innocent websites along with the intended victim site.

Nothing will ever excuse a DDoS, it's not valid protest, it's just a childish waste of the resources of the internet.

What are you doing to stop the war? I got off my arse, went to Menwith and even got arrested, costing the government time and money. I stood up to be counted, and I plan to continue to do so as vocally as possible until the government stops this slaughter. I didn't hide behind my PC and DoS a website, the only thing we'll achieve that way is to make protestors look like the same childish fools that DoS indiscriminately and spread virii all the time.

my £0.02 worth :)

Dave