Skip to content or view screen version

Flagrant bias from the BBC

Media workers against war | 21.03.2003 13:36

In this message:
1. Flagrant pro-war bias on News at 10
2. BBC news chief to debate anti-war leader

1. Mass anger is not "news" for the BBC

On its 45 minute flagship news bulletin at 10pm last night (March 20), the BBC ignored the powerful protests that took place across Britain.

The bulletin showed the protests at parliament only as a background for a report from Westminster. And it only mentioned protests abroad, saying that they were "mainly in Muslim countries".

Please phone and email your disgust to BBC complaints on 08700 100 222,  info@bbc.co.uk

FACT: The protests at Parliament last night entirely occupied Parliament Square and forced police to close Whitehall, blocking off Downing Street.
The police initially barricaded off Parliament Square, but the barricades were breached by thousands of school students in the afternoon.

FACT: There were huge protests across the world yesterday, including the USA, Belgium, Egypt, Spain, India and Switzerland. Channel 4 called it "one of the largest days of world demonstrations".

FACT: Police in San Francisco arrested 1,025 people at an anti-war demonstration. Anti-war demonstrators in New York completely blocked New York's Broadway for two blocks below 42nd Street

FACT: London will be brought to a halt tomorrow by another massive, angry national demonstration against the war. Millions have been inspired by the school students, who don't want a future of war and terror.

The BBC is still treating the anti-war movement as "just another demo". It has not understood the chasm that has opened up between parliament and public opinion.

It is a gross distortion to devote bulletins to uninformative and repetitive reports from behind UK/US lines in Iraq, while ignoring the battle to stop
this war.

The BBC is manifestly failing in its duty as a public service broadcaster to reflect truthfully the course of events and allow democratic expression of
majority views.

Please phone and email your disgust to BBC complaints on 08700 100 222,  info@bbc.co.uk

2. BBC news chief to debate anti-war leader on coverage of Iraq "Reporting War on Iraq: The Challenge for Public Service Broadcasting"

Join this debate!

With speakers:
Mark Damazer, Deputy Director, BBC News
Andrew Murray, Chair, Stop the War Coalition

Thursday, March 27
7pm
Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research
Stanhope Place, London W2
(200 yards from Marble Arch tube)
Tel. 0207 479 5900

Media workers against war

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

I used to think the BBC was OK

21.03.2003 14:00

Compared to American corporate media, I used to think that the BBC news was OK. But now I look at the 'War on Iraq' feature, and I just find one-sided coverage of the 'Allied' advancement, and NO coverage of the anti-war protests whatsoever! Even 'getting it straight from the horses mouth' from Reuters has proven fruitless, and has written about polls indicating that the most of the UK SUPPORT this war!!!!

Oh where oh where can I find an unbiased news source, not just on the Iraq 'war' ('impending genocide and dominitaion' is probably closer), but other issues, including those that may not directly affect the activist communtiy? Apart from Indymedia of course...

Thomas J


disgusted with the media!!

21.03.2003 14:07

The BBC way of NO reporting news is just another sign of the big failure of this so -called "democratic system" under which we live. As obvious and agressive as the response of the Cardiff police breaking a young guy's head with a metal stick when trying to run away from them. Long life to Indymedia!!!

The duck!!


Flagrant bias from the BBC

21.03.2003 14:10

One way that the BBC have shown their bias is in the health warnings issued before any report from Iraq. These state that the reporter is subject to restrictions by the Iraqi government.

I object to these health warnings, because the BBC fail to give similar warnings before reports from journalists with the British/US troops. These journalists are also subject to restrictions. The BBC is not being balanced.

The BBC has obviously made this decision at the highest level. All radio and television programmes that I have observed have only issued health warnings for reports from Iraq. They are a propaganda organisation, not a public service broadcaster.

David


BBC

21.03.2003 14:10

I'm also digruntled with the BBC - I belive Dimbleby recently remarked on the protests outside Parliament as 'about 15 people' when he blatantly knew there were more than that just round the corner.
Rageh Omar - when asked whether there were signs in Baghdad that the residents knew they were going to war, he replied no, there weren't many people about and there were sandbags everywhere. So there wasn't any indication the people of Baghdad were preparing for war then?!

Mutiny
mail e-mail: mutinymail@btopenworld.com
- Homepage: http://angelfire.com/rebellion/insubordination


Balenced News

21.03.2003 14:24

I recommend www.guardian.co.uk
Not only can you read Richard Perle's lunatic/frightening observations on the future of the UN but also those of leading anti-war protesters.
Just to prove that I am not in the employ of this paper I have also found good coverage of the protests on www.independent.co.uk & perhaps surprisingly www.washingtonpost.com
For light entertainment goto www.ScaryDuck.com

Tony Webb
mail e-mail: Tony.Webb.ext@Siemens.com


A lost story...

21.03.2003 14:34

I'd just like to say that yesterday 16 of my friends (who are members of the Welsh Language Society, Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg) got arrested after chaining themselves to a tax office in Carmarthen (Wales) in protest of the British Government using our taxes to fund this charade in the Gulf. Was it reported on the national news? No. Wales news? Yes...using all of 10 seconds, which gave no time for reporting our argument at all. Thanks BBC!

Maz


Here's mine - feel free to comment

21.03.2003 14:37


OK MWAW, done and copied below. Thanks for the prompt.

Dear BBC News,

I, together with many colleagues and friends, are increasingly concerned with what we consider to be non-balanced news reporting from what's traditionaly been perceived as a 'fair' BBC News.

I sense growing alarm concerning the rather obvious lack
of reporting of the initial public protest against the so-called war.

Particularly affected was the BBC News at Ten of the 20th March '03.

Many of us are turning to independent internet news, such as Indymedia to get a more balanced picture of the world both at home and abroad.

I feel that the BBC has a good history of balanced reporting and has worked very hard over many years to earn its' international reputation as a non-biased global news organisation.

It would be a great shame for the BBC to loose this foothold of integrity in a world where independent news media is growing fast and earning increasing public respect.

Joe P.


Like this article.....

21.03.2003 15:52

Absolutely no mention of events in the UK

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2872873.stm

PhillC


The Beeb

21.03.2003 18:17

I've mentioned this on Indymedia before, but I worked for the BBC (1989-1998) and in my experience it was so intimately bound up with the establishment, the British and even US governments that expecting impartiality from it, especially in wartime, would be like expecting vegetarianism from a sabre-toothed tiger.

Steve