Wouldn't you say that war is already afoot in Iraq and has been since the sanctions (economic war) and the illegal "no-fly zones" (an on and off air war) were ukased? Wouldn't it also be fair to admit that this already existing war, compounded with the planned affects of the Gulf War, amount to genocide with over 2 million dead and an average of 7,000 more every week? Lastly, given the first two premises, wouldn't it be proper to conclude that what is being threatened by Bush et al is an escalation of the genocide, not the starting of a war?

Given the above argument, which based on the existing evidence is sound, it would seem that those MPs voting with the government have gone on record promoting crimes against humanity and unwittingly given evidence against themselves. Finally, in a paraphrasal of what Justice Jackson said at the Nuremberg Trials, it is the DUTY of Every citizen to Prevent by ANY means the committing of crimes against humanity by her or his government, of which genocide is the most heinous.