We are losing the argument against the war!
Harlequin | 20.02.2003 10:15
We are rapidly losing the argument against the war. Immediatly after the massive anti-war march last Saturday there was a barrage of criticism against the anti-war movement from people like Tony Blair, The Sun and even Mirror columnist saying that no one wants war but something has to be done about Saddam and his continued oppression of his people and the Kurds. We need answers to agruments put forward for war like that!
The pro war lobby are coming out with very powerful arguments such as it would be foolish to leave Saddam to do as he pleases and the pro war lobby are insisting that they are dead against war too but that war may be the only option. Our arguments against this war are wearing thin now. Everyone knows that war will cause massive death, destruction and displacement of millions of people but most people can see no alternative to war in dealing with Saddam!
There have even been many people with libertarian views like ourselves coming out in support of this war because they support oppressed groups in Iraq like the Kurds and are arguning that for the sake of all the oppressed people in Iraq Saddam must be overthrown. They too know the real motives about this war that is mainly for oil but still want Saddam to be overthrown by anyone even the Americans.
We need to start coming up with fresh arguments against this war if we are not to lose the argument completely and so make war inevitable! We don't even have the majority of the population behind us either as most people in America support the coming war and most people in Britain would support it with UN backing so we are definitly losing the argument we need to stand up and face that problem!
There have even been many people with libertarian views like ourselves coming out in support of this war because they support oppressed groups in Iraq like the Kurds and are arguning that for the sake of all the oppressed people in Iraq Saddam must be overthrown. They too know the real motives about this war that is mainly for oil but still want Saddam to be overthrown by anyone even the Americans.
We need to start coming up with fresh arguments against this war if we are not to lose the argument completely and so make war inevitable! We don't even have the majority of the population behind us either as most people in America support the coming war and most people in Britain would support it with UN backing so we are definitly losing the argument we need to stand up and face that problem!
Harlequin
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
parallel universe
20.02.2003 10:49
Losing the argument? Millions protesting, the biggest global movement against war ever, the Labour Party in meltdown, the hawks desparately skipping from one argument to another and finding few will buy any of them? If this is losing then let's have more of it!
New arguments needed? Why? All we've done so far is tell the truth. I see no reason to stop.
-
Sorry, you're wrong...
20.02.2003 10:56
The only thing we're rapidly losing is the sight of *your* head as it disappears completely up your arse :)
You fail miserably in your court jester guise. The sooner you get sent back to being a uniformed beat officer the better.
Rob
Media propaganda
20.02.2003 11:16
This will always happen. It doesn't necessarily mean people against the war will change their minds - it may help them see how corrupt and biassed the media is.
hatethemedia
odd that one person has doubts therefore...
20.02.2003 12:00
arthur
We still have questions to answer!
20.02.2003 14:47
Peter Tatchell came up with an answer for one of those questions about how to get rid of Saddams' regime now positive answers are needed for the other two.
If the Stop The War Coalition was a political party it would fail because it only comes out with negative defensive arguments not proper positive alternatives!
Harlequin
No need for war
20.02.2003 19:12
The Iraqi population should be fed, clothed and armed and they will elect their own prefered government.
What should be done about international terrorism?
MI6, the CIA and Mossad should be disbanded and tried for crimes against humanity, then there would be no more Saddam Hussein's.
...and weapons of massive destruction?
Everyone has scalar weapons...
Make peace with your neighbour, spread love, ban war and use EM technology for free energy and to heal the sick.
A better World is possible.
Alternatives
what what. Cup of tea?
20.02.2003 21:10
Wake up Harlequin!
mb
e-mail: nomoreroyals@hotmail.com
The War is Not The Story Because...
21.02.2003 03:14
The Afghan issue is quite a problem for the 'coalition' that prosecuted T.W.A.T. on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. Most criminals get dealt with according to crimes already made not for new ones that may or may not happen. The same applies to the Tony and George show. They are the criminals and the crime that they dragged us through was one of GENOCIDE - a crime against all humanity. GENOCIDE is easy to look up for a dictionary definition and easily understandable. In the Afghan campaign the minority Arab population were exterminated - not really a 'just' war no matter how indoctrinated one is regarding the 'Taliban being evil'. The real evil is at home, with Tony and George, and their criminal clique knew in advance about September 11. They deliberately lied about it in order to get their war - costing you the taxpayer something like $40 billion - and all profits to them.
There is no point worrying about the Iraq crisis - the issue is the 'Tony and George Crisis'. Sodom is only a distraction so don't fall for it - openly talk about 9/11 and the arms trade fair that went on at the same time. This is the issue to put first.
Stoopid dimwit