IT WAS NO ACCIDENT
Dirk | 10.02.2003 12:05
"What I am saying is true. The British Establishment is happy to try and ridicule me and I believe many of them are happy that Diana and Dodi were killed
"A Friend shocked me the other day saying he thought Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed had been assassinated. Eh? Yes, he said, it was as clear as day that MI5 or, as it may be, MI6 had been responsible for their deaths. What shocked me most was his judgment that our security forces had been wholly justified in their action. My friend reckoned it was right to prevent a marriage between the Princess and Mr. Fayed, and if this meant they had to be bumped off, so be it. Intelligence agents were in the Hotel."
Ex-MI6 Agent Richard Tomlin-son claims that the MI6 was involved "in the Paris assassination where the Princess of Wales, Diana, was killed".
The Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD has got a free hand to kill whenever, whoever and wherever. Influence of the Israel-lobbies almost anywhere in the world.
"MOSSAD's business is spying and killing. MOSSAD does that in the USA just as freely as in Great Britain, France or Germany.
What would be a motive for the MOSSAD to murder Princess Diana? Well, Israel would have been in trouble if Diana had married Dodi Fayed. Think about it. What if Diana would have visited Palestine as a mother to a half Arabic child and as a wife to an Arab man? Imagine the masses cheering Diana, embracing her as one of theirs. What if the Princess had then hugged a Palestinian child in front of hundreds of TV-cameras? Perhaps a child whose parents were murdered by Israeli death squads! A child whose father might have been shaken to death as a method of Israeli interrogation procedures - shaken until his artery was bursting open. A child whose pregnant mother was beaten to death because a family member of her's was an alleged "terrorist" against Israel. The truth about the Israeli terror regime would have been revealed to the world - thanks to Diana.
Last but not least, the powerful Israel lobby surrounding the British Royals could not tolerate an Arabic influence inside the British Establishment.
Dirk
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
bollocks
10.02.2003 12:56
Facts
Yeah Dirk
10.02.2003 13:46
bullshit buster
For once
10.02.2003 14:38
1. That which is evidencial; ie witness statements, photos etc. These are often mistaken for proof, but they can never be proof, only corroberating evidence.
2. That which can be scientifically demonstratable; often not as clear cut as would befit its grand claims, but nevertheless pretty reliable in the right hands. Often substituted with scientific opinion.
3. That which can be logically deduced; usually failsafe, but largely misunderstood and therefore both underused and only marginally effective in argument. Often conflated with fallacy and pride.
Finally those so called conspiracy sites are excellent sources of infomation, and when properly scrutinised, said info can often be upgraded to factual status utilising the methods outlined above combined with endless checking and crosschecking of original sources.
Unfortunatly the preceeding article employed none of these methods, although there are plenty of sources saying roughly the same thing [namely that diana was murdered etc].
The real test of the issue comes, however, when one attempts to piece together the 'official' explanation of events. Then you really can fry your brain attempting to fit the 'facts' and reality together.
Go on try it yourself, and remember, seeking info is active, receiving info is passive.
jackslucid
e-mail:
jackslucid@hotmail.com
Yes of course it's bullshit
11.02.2003 21:58
In this instance, Icke's 'The Biggest Secret' gives the best-referenced background to this particular assassination/sacrifice
dh