Good article by Kurdish writer on why Iraq should be attacked.
Dov | 30.01.2003 16:44
He also talks about the hypocrisy of the left who are against this war.

Dov
Dov | 30.01.2003 16:44
Dov
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Crap
30.01.2003 20:43
No they won't - they'll be filled with corpses. Twat.
johnny_boy
Zionazi takes time off ...
30.01.2003 22:21
Pizza
yes but...
30.01.2003 22:31
I'ld rather listen to the views of ordinary Iraqis, and people who live in the surrounding regions. From what I can make out, they are pretty much against the war.
The whole liberation argument would be more credible if Bush wasn't talking about using nuclear weapons. Not to mention the depleted uranium that will definitely used. These are weapons that are going to keep on killing people in the most horrible ways, long after the conflict is over.
mark
Comprador bourgeois
30.01.2003 22:43
Whenever imperialism wants to ratchet up the pressure on Iraq it suddenly 'remembers' the Kurds in a hypocritical display. Never mind the fact that it has been imperialism that always oppressed the Kurdish people through Turkey where the massacres continue, that labelled the PKK 'terrorist', and cynically encouraged the risings at the end of the last Gulf War.
No-one should be taken in by imperialism cloaked in the guise of human rights because it is the opposite of human rights.
?
us liberators fund kurdish massacres
31.01.2003 09:59
Some stats: 50,000 Kurds killed, over 3,000 villages destroyed, 2 to 3 million displaced as well as all kinds of torture, mass rapes etc
Even today people are being jailed for speaking Kurdish, wearing Kurdish colours or giving their children Kurdish names.
THe majority of Kurds want self determination and a united Kurdistan, that would mean TUrkey giving up land with great natural resources. That is one of the reasons why after the last Gulf War the US allowed Saddam to continue ruling with his 'iron fist'
dh