Mitre Corp., Warren Buffet, Global Hawk, and September 11, 2001
soljah | 16.01.2003 18:57
Buffet also markets Biz Jets, which CEO's all over the world are buying up as the latest fad. Of course, this means that Warren Buffet, consumate money launderer and second in wealth in the US only to Mr. William Gates, the very man that may have been at the heart of the play calling on September 11 (he was at least playing along), makes the machines the powerful fly in. Fear of death always works, doesn't it?
9-11: Mitre Corp., Warren Buffet, Global Hawk, and September 11, 2001
Posted by: souljah on Jan 16, 2003 - 06:14 PM
Hyperlinks considered, this piece pretty much sums up what really went down on September 11, 2001.
http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1663&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
*
Posted by: souljah on Jan 16, 2003 - 06:14 PM
Hyperlinks considered, this piece pretty much sums up what really went down on September 11, 2001.
http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1663&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 *
soljah
Homepage:
http://www.memes.org
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
meme mines
16.01.2003 19:55
911 is a pretty far out way to simply assasinate a few people who "know too much".
mime
my memes
16.01.2003 20:09
Hmmmm... even nutty conspiracy sites saw through this one when it circulated back in august 2002 (or maybe it's all just a cover up).
See:
Enough of all this meme comspiracy stuff!
Sure some of the facts and links are correct, or sound very plausible, but...
What this stated in that article, " 9-11 planes exceeded software performance limits" or "Two 911 Jetliners EXCEEDED
Their Software Barriers" from Friends of Liberty, is incorrect regarding the 757's and 767's (and most of the rest of it).
The Boeing 757 and 767, as used in the hijackings, aren't fly-by-wire aircraft, they're flight control systems are hydraulic, not computerised, all 757's and 767's have are onboard computerised warning systems to suggest actions to the pilot, a voice saying "PULL UP! PULL UP!" and alarms when diving are too low etc.
I'd ask people to look into the Boeing 757 that crashed into a mountain ridge while trying to land at Cali, Colombia, in 1995, the 757's ground-warning system told the pilot to pull up, as he did, but the pilot did not retract the speed brakes as they climbed.
The only Boeing that is fly-by-wire with build in computerised pilot assistance/override is the 777. On the 777 though the pilot has the ultimate say, pilots in general don't like being flown by computers, they can override the onboard computers and their built-in soft limits i.e. maximum g, pitch, roll etc on the 777. The only airliners that have flight control computers that the pilot can't override are Airbus A320's and newer Airbus models - the most controversial airliners going among pilots.
As for the rest of it I can't even be bothered.
In my opinion it's disinformation presented to discredit (and confuse) those that are seeking for answers regarding 9/11.
Rense.com have updated their posting of it in August 2002 shortly after it appeared:
Flight Evaluation: Boeing 767-400ER
Air Line Pilot, February 2001, p. 22
By Capt. Terry L. Lutz (Northwest), Director, Aircraft Development and Evaluation Programs, ALPA Aircraft Design and Operation Group
"With the absence of the "soft protections" incorporated in the B-777, the B-767-400ER feels more "like an airplane."...."
---------------------
+ see this article below or just go do the research yourself:
Unlike Airbus, Boeing lets aviator override fly-by-wire technology
Monday, March 20, 2000
By JAMES WALLACE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
be a bit more choosy