Skip to content or view screen version

Greenpeace Invade Sizewell B

Jim Farrand | 13.01.2003 14:40

Greenpeace activists invade Sizewell B.

Greenpeace activists are inside Sizewell B nuclear power plant for the second time in 3 months. A group of 19 volunteers entered the site aorund 06:10 and have since gained access to sensitive areas of the plant, such as the control room and reactor dome.

Sizewell B is owned and run by the ailing company British Energy, which recently recieved £650million of taxpayers money to precvent the company collapsing. According to Greenpeace, this money could have been used to build offshore wind farms sufficient to provide 15% of the UK's electricity requirements. British Energy currently provides around 20%.

During a similar protest last October, 150 Greenpeace volunteers invaded the site with only token resistence from a few private security guards and workers. The occupation ended after 30 hours due to the failure of radiation monitoring equipment used by the activists to ensure safety. During the occupation, activists painted "72% Say No" in large letters on the outside of one building. The slogan referred to the results of a Mori poll on nuclear power.

Greenpeace claims that these protests demonstrate what an easy target a nuclear power station would be for terrorists. Rob Gueterbock, speaking from the reactor dome at todays protest claimed that "Sizewell is easier to get into than a Norwich night-club.". At the time of the last protest, Greenpeace claimed that all nuclear power stations could be closed in time for the next general election, and that the UK's energy needs could be met easily and economically by safe, clean alternatives such as offshore wind farms.

Nuclear power generations creates highly dangerous materials, many of which will still be dangerous in thousands of years time. The British nuclear industry currently has cleanup liabilities estimated at £50billion, all of which will be paid by the taxpayer.

Jim Farrand
- e-mail: jim@farrand.net

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

ailing British Energy

13.01.2003 15:00

one of the reasons why nuclear electricity is currently overpriced is that, illogically, it has to pay a carbon levy. Windpower, on the other hand, is subsidised.

sceptic


Response to sceptic

13.01.2003 16:53

Sceptic, I'd like to know where you get this information from. Wind power is subsidized by who? Not by the government, at least not in anywhere close to the scale that nuclear power is subsidized.

Whether is is justified or not, the amount the nuclear industry pays as a result of the carbon levy is tiny in comparison to the massive subsidies they have recieved from the taxpayer. As my article states, the government has taken over liabilities worth 50billion from the nuclear industry.

In a totally free market where nuclear power was not subsidized in this way or subject to the carbon levy, nuclear power would be even more expensive than it is now.

In any case, the carbon levy is justified. Nuclear power may not produce greenhouse emissions but it does produce equally (if not more) dangerous waste.

Jim Farrand


subsidies

13.01.2003 18:17

sceptic


48 billion would build a lot of wind farms...

13.01.2003 20:18


UK nuclear liability fund gets go-ahead

UK: November 15, 2002

LONDON - Britain said this week it would go ahead with plans to put its 48 billion pounds of state nuclear clean-up liabilities into a special fund, a move that could open the way for a new round of nuclear privatisation.

 http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/18610/newsDate/15-Nov-2002/story.htm

no-nuke