Greenpeace Invade Sizewell B
Jim Farrand | 13.01.2003 14:40
Sizewell B is owned and run by the ailing company British Energy, which recently recieved £650million of taxpayers money to precvent the company collapsing. According to Greenpeace, this money could have been used to build offshore wind farms sufficient to provide 15% of the UK's electricity requirements. British Energy currently provides around 20%.
During a similar protest last October, 150 Greenpeace volunteers invaded the site with only token resistence from a few private security guards and workers. The occupation ended after 30 hours due to the failure of radiation monitoring equipment used by the activists to ensure safety. During the occupation, activists painted "72% Say No" in large letters on the outside of one building. The slogan referred to the results of a Mori poll on nuclear power.
Greenpeace claims that these protests demonstrate what an easy target a nuclear power station would be for terrorists. Rob Gueterbock, speaking from the reactor dome at todays protest claimed that "Sizewell is easier to get into than a Norwich night-club.". At the time of the last protest, Greenpeace claimed that all nuclear power stations could be closed in time for the next general election, and that the UK's energy needs could be met easily and economically by safe, clean alternatives such as offshore wind farms.
Nuclear power generations creates highly dangerous materials, many of which will still be dangerous in thousands of years time. The British nuclear industry currently has cleanup liabilities estimated at £50billion, all of which will be paid by the taxpayer.
Jim Farrand
e-mail:
jim@farrand.net
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
ailing British Energy
13.01.2003 15:00
sceptic
Response to sceptic
13.01.2003 16:53
Whether is is justified or not, the amount the nuclear industry pays as a result of the carbon levy is tiny in comparison to the massive subsidies they have recieved from the taxpayer. As my article states, the government has taken over liabilities worth 50billion from the nuclear industry.
In a totally free market where nuclear power was not subsidized in this way or subject to the carbon levy, nuclear power would be even more expensive than it is now.
In any case, the carbon levy is justified. Nuclear power may not produce greenhouse emissions but it does produce equally (if not more) dangerous waste.
Jim Farrand
subsidies
13.01.2003 18:17
or
What's the source for the £50billion clean up liability cost?
sceptic
48 billion would build a lot of wind farms...
13.01.2003 20:18
UK nuclear liability fund gets go-ahead
UK: November 15, 2002
LONDON - Britain said this week it would go ahead with plans to put its 48 billion pounds of state nuclear clean-up liabilities into a special fund, a move that could open the way for a new round of nuclear privatisation.
no-nuke