THE REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY


 http://www.franciscotrindade.com
Update of January of the site
With two new texts
DIALECTIC OF PROUDHON METHOD AND REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY
REFLECTIONS ON THE MATERIALISM OF THE CENTURY XVIII

Technical responsible for the totality of the site
The friend always José Carlos Fortuna.
 http://www.franciscotrindade.com



DIALECTIC OF PROUDHON AS METHOD AND AS REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY

We will undertake an analysis about the conception of dialectic of Proudhon. Proudhon is extremely hostile to the dialectic of Hegel. He criticizes her not only in the bottom as in the applications. Clearly formulated in the works of maturity, the whole work of Proudhon is of impregnated facto of this hostility. The antinomic is not solved; it is in this that the fundamental addiction of the whole philosophy of Hegel resides. The two have that compose the antinomic they oscillate, he wants to each other, he wants among other terms antinomics; what leads to new results " (De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l'Église - vol.IV, 1858, pág.148) " The terms antinomics are not solved, as the opposed pôloses of a pile electric they are not destroyed. The problem is not in finding their coalition that would be your death, but your balance always unstable, second variable the own development of the society " ( Théorie de la Propriété, 1865, pág.52) " The unstable balance among the two have, he is not born of a third, but of your reciprocal " action. In a word, the formula of Hegel is only a triad for pleasure or mistake of the Master, that sees her three terms where two only exist and that he didn't see that the antinomic is not solved, but that implicates he wants an oscillation he wants an antagonism, the only susceptible of balances. Of this point of view, all the system of Hegel should be re-done ". (De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l'Église, 1958, Vol.I, págs.28-29).


REFLECTIONS ON THE MATERIALISM OF THE CENTURY XVIII


There are already about ten years that our philosophical attention felt allure for the work of the socialist libertarian P.J. Proudhon. In this space of time, a lot of partially conclusive it was possible to reach. Among other things, that the thought philosophical, political, economic, social of the author of the Political capacity of the working classes it suffers influence direct of the call utopian socialism, nomenclature that belongs him, and indirect of the call materialism of the century XVIII, object of study of the present article. As Proudhon interferes in the philosophers' group that ontologicamente speaking is called materialists, turn pertinent to analyze the possibility conditions and simultaneously of limitations of the philosophical materialism previous to the materialism of the century XIX.
Then we refer us to the materialism french that namely found present in the Encyclopedia starting from 1751, it dates of the first volume. In fact, when we tell materialism of the century XVIII, we want to tell materialism french of the century XVIII because actually, the more important materialistic philosophers of this century are French. It can be argued with Holbach that is of German origin, what is correct, but of any in the ways it doesn't invalidate the general thesis behind enunciated. Holbach was German, but it went very early to France and your more important and more influential work is la Système Nature written as the title it indicates, in french.