Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Zionist dictatorship

NA | 14.12.2002 13:25

Who said this? -- "I would like to go back to America -- when the Zionist dictatorship has been overthrown."

The Unraveling
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of December 14, 2002


Welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.

Who said this? -- "I would like to go back to America -- when the
Zionist dictatorship has been overthrown."

Was it a Moslem extremist, or a swastika-waving "neo-nazi"? No, it was
American chess genius Bobby Fischer, in a recent interview he gave on an
Icelandic television program. "…when the Zionist dictatorship has been
overthrown." Mr. Fischer has figured it out. And millions more are
figuring it out with each passing year.

Who said this? -- "The current troubles in the world are all because of
that shitty little country, Israel. Why should the world be in danger of
World War III because of those people?" Was it an extreme anti-Semite
ranting on the Internet, venting his hate for Jews? No, it was the
French ambassador to Britain, Daniel Bernard. Mr. Bernard has figured it
out. And millions more are figuring it out with each passing year.

Who said this? -- "I can't stand Jews and everything happening to them
is their own fault." Was it Yasser Arafat or Saddam Hussein in a moment
of candor? No, according to Jewish journalist Barbara Amiel it was the
"doyenne" of Britain's salon society, later identified in the press as
Lady Powell. She reportedly continued, when some of her guests expressed
shock at her remark: "Oh, come on. You all feel like that." Now Lady
Powell felt it necessary to deny it was she who made these remarks, but
no one denies that they were made in the circumstances described: "I
can't stand Jews and everything that happens to them is their own
fault." The society hostess has figured it out. And millions more are
figuring it out with each passing year.

And today, I'm going to help you figure it out.

Why are Jews disliked? In the media they own and control they are
saintly figures: intelligent, wise, noble, philanthropic, persecuted,
and good-looking. (Well, even inches-thick makeup and plastic surgery
can't make us think that Barbara Walters and Ariel Sharon look like
Aphrodite and Apollo. But many of the unthinking do accept a good part
of the Jewish self-promoting vision of themselves.)

In the age of the Internet and instant communications, it's becoming
more and more difficult for the Jews to maintain that image. In an age
when Jews are at the zenith of their power, they have overplayed their
hand so grossly that their hypocrisy is showing for all the world to
see. The truth about the Jews is leaking out all over the place.

One of the most astounding instances of Jewish hypocrisy was uttered by
a Jew named Isi Leibler, who is no less than the chairman of the
governing board of the World Jewish Congress. Now Isi Leibler is
well-known as a powerful Jew in Australia, where he was for years the
official head of the Jewish community there. He now lives in Israel. In
an interview with a Jerusalem newspaper, he stated about Israel "This is
a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the
Jews." In an essay he wrote for the World Jewish Congress, he decried
intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews as a kind of racial suicide, and
likened assimilation with non-Jews as a slow bleeding to death of the
Jewish people. He emphasized that focus of Israeli policy should be to
sharpen and intensify Jewish identity and that even giving up territory
was acceptable if it meant getting rid of non-Jews and making Israel a
more nearly all-Jewish state. Leibler argues that post-Zionists threaten
Israel when they publish textbooks that de-emphasize Jewish racial
interests and replace them with "universalist" history. In the interview
mentioned, Leibler went so far as to say: "Multiculturalism has no place
in Israel. Israel was created as a Jewish state for the Jews." That's
the Jew Isi Leibler talking about his own people's country, talking
about Israel. [Leibler, Isi: Is the Dream Ending? Post-Zionism and its
Discontents - A Threat to the Jewish Future, Institute of the World
Jewish Congress, Israel]

But what was Isi Leibler saying when he lived in Australia, a White
country, a non-Jewish country? What was Isi Leibler saying when he was
the head of Australia's powerful Jewish minority? Isi Leibler's advice
to Israel is to protect its racial and cultural heritage. Isi Leibler's
advice to Jews is to avoid intermarriage. Isi Leibler thinks it's just
fine -- even necessary -- to separate non-Jews from Jews in Israel, to
get non-Jews on the other side of a well-defended border, to throw them
out of Israel. But to Australians Isi Leibler played quite a different
tune. When Australian politician Pauline Hanson was galvanizing White
Australians in 1993 with her questioning of the wisdom of non-White
immigration to that country, Leibler warned that "extremists" were
threatening precious multiculturalism. He said: "There is a need to sit
together and establish a way in which Australians can recapture that
spirit of multiculturalism which I think we are all proud being part and
parcel of, and which is really under threat…" [Australian Herald-Sun,
September 27, 2000]

How much clearer does it have to be before you see it? Leibler and his
fellow powerful Jews want racial nationalism for their own people,
because racial nationalism makes them strong and ensures their survival.
They want racial nationalism because they want their kind to survive and
racial nationalism is the key to survival. They're not stupid. They want
what is best for Jews.

But Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews don't want racial nationalism
for White people. In Australia and Europe and South Africa and the
United States -- wherever White people live -- Leibler and his kind in
Jewish organizations and in the Jewish-controlled media do everything in
their power to destroy racial nationalism for White people, everything
in their power to keep us from having it, everything in their power to
make it disreputable and impossible and illegal. Just the other day,
Leibler said that one of the most important things in the world to him
was Israel's "right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state." [Israel
Insider, November 24, 2002] But Leibler and his co-racialists in the
Jewish ADL and other groups devote their lives and their billions to
preventing White people from claiming their right to sovereign White
states. Keeping Britain British, or keeping America American, or keeping
France French, is anathema to them -- it is the ultimate in evil and
they never let us forget that.

And people of many races and of many political persuasions are beginning
to see that Jewish hypocrisy. Liberals, even race-mixing liberals, are
beginning to see that there's something wrong and deeply unethical about
letting the intensely ethnocentric Jews be the leaders of their struggle
for "equality." Advocates for human rights are beginning to see that
something is rotten in Denmark when a group well-known for imprisonment
of its enemies without trial, its torture of its political opponents,
and its indiscriminate bombing and machine-gunning of innocent civilians
is allowed to pose as "champions of human rights." They simply couldn't
ignore it when the same Isi Leibler said in the July 29, 2002 issue of
the Jerusalem Post that Jews should "stop apologizing" for lobbing
missiles into Palestinian apartment buildings. Leibler's exact words
were: "It is therefore high time that we stopped apologizing for
civilians killed because they live in proximity to leading terrorists…"
After all, it's not like they're anything special like Jews, is it?
They're only Palestinians. Isi! -- and Hymie and Sol and Abe -- your
hypocrisy is showing and everyone can see it. Even those you deluded in
the past can see it. And the times they are a-changing.

The times they are a-changing partly because, as I said, the Jews have
seriously overplayed their hand in the power game they are playing and a
lot of us can see their game now, and their insincerity. They're also
changing because the Jews' plan for "harmonious multiculturalism" in
West is essentially an impossible plan, and they have inadvertently
created a monster that is growing out of control of its masters. They
have empowered and nurtured the nationalism of non-Whites in an effort
to exterminate us, but now their clients are biting the hand that fed
them, as they wake up and realize that the Jews would like to mongrelize
and peonize and enslave them just as much as they want to do that to us.

I don't usually make predictions, because history has a way of taking
all of us by surprise. But I'll go out on a limb today, because I can
see certain patterns developing in the world, and I think they bode well
for us and ill for the Jewish establishment, despite its fatness and its
money. I think that the lines of conflict in the world are increasingly
forming between the Jewish establishment on one side, and almost
everyone else on the other side. Yes, it is true that Jews are a
powerful presence in all White Western nations, and that they can almost
write the laws themselves and use their media to punish anyone who gets
out of line. But more and more of us are "getting out of line" every
day, and increasingly the rebels are people within the establishment,
within the power structure, people with a lot to lose. And the Jews
can't deal with it all happening at once. If you read their own
publications, they're seriously worried about the "new European
anti-Semitism." Their extortion from Switzerland and Germany was
successful, but their attempted boycott of France was a total flop. Only
in Britain, where they have infiltrated the highest levels of society,
and in the United States, where they have the unthinking support of the
fundamentalist rubes, do they still have enough control to push their
desired war with Iraq with any kind of unanimity. And even there they
are slipping. I think that the only way they'll get their war will be to
engineer some kind of fake incident, another 9/11 or Pearl Harbor, which
they will use to whip the American peasantry into some kind of fury
against Saddam Hussein.

But even if they succeed in getting that war and winning it, and
redrawing the map of the Middle East so that it is ruled -- and its oil
exploited -- by Jewish-controlled puppet regimes, I think the Jews will
be the long term losers. Increasingly the Left and the Right will come
to terms in deciding that real communitarianism -- real socialism, if
you will, and real free enterprise -- works only when there is a kinship
bond among the people of a nation. And Jewish internationalism and
transnational capitalism, and the importation of cheap labor, will be
seen as the dirty and evil things that they are. Racial nationalism will
inspire peoples all over the world, who will begin to realize that
wanting self-determination for their folk should make them allies -- not
enemies -- of other peoples who also want self-determination for their
own kind. The Palestinian nationalist and the British National Party
member and the National Alliance member in America and the members of
nationalist communities across the globe will increasingly see that
their interests coincide and that their only real enemy is the Jewish
world system of racemixing and cultural destruction and exploitation
which is ruining us all.

European resistance to the Jewish war plans is at an all-time high.
European opposition to Israeli tyranny and genocide is large and growing
-- much higher than in the United States. Awareness that Jews are an
alien group with their own agenda is almost universal there. When I saw
the interview with chess master Bobby Fischer on Icelandic television a
few days ago, and heard him denounce the Jewish establishment in terms
that might have made William Pierce blush, did the Icelandic television
interviewers frown and denounce Fischer's "anti-Semitism" or insist that
he change the subject? Did they edit the interview so that the
anti-Jewish sections ended up on the cutting-room floor? Not at all. The
interviewers smiled and bade Fischer to continue. He spoke for half an
hour. Though they did ask him to limit his use of four-letter words,
they were entirely friendly and sympathetic as Fischer recounted the
persecution he has received at the hands of the Jews and detailed the
crimes they have committed. And similar interviews with Fischer in other
countries have been much the same, even when the stations openly feared
the "anti-hate" laws the Jews have imposed on them. Only in the
controlled United States media is Fischer barred and censored.

Recently, resistance.com, a pro-White Web site, gave an interview to a
spokesman from the Chicano nationalist group La Voz de Aztlan. Now, if
there are two racial nationalist groups who have conflicting interests
and reasons to dislike and mistrust each other, it's the folks at
Resistance, who are with the National Alliance and are Whites mainly
from America, and the Aztlan people, who openly wish to slice off a
chunk of the United States and transfer it to Mexican control. But, you
know, although those conflicts were mentioned in the interview, the main
focus of the talk was the common interest of both groups in defeating
the Jewish power structure and establishing freedom and independence for
their own respective peoples once the Jewish establishment was dealt
with. Here's an excerpt from that interview:

Resistance News: "Your web site contains an article "Wotan vs.
Tezcatlipoca The
Spiritual War for California and the Southwest" by Stephen A. McNallen,
whom I
presume is a White nationalist. What is the opinion of Hispanic
nationalists towards other racial nationalist organizations such as the
Nation of Islam and the National Alliance?"

Ernesto Cienfuegos: "A person could write a whole book on this topic. In
order to be as brief as possible, I am going to answer from my own
personal perspective as a nationalist. I have always been guided on this
issue by a very wise quotation said by Benito Juarez, the Mexican
president credited for defeating the occupying French troops in the
Battle of Puebla. He said, 'As among nations as with men, the respect
for the rights of others, leads to peace.' I personally have great
respect for the Black Muslims ever since I met Richard X while a student
at the university. I remember buying a Final Call newspaper from him and
having a conversation. I was a member of the …[Chicano student movement]
(MEChA) at the time but the mutual respect we showed each other led to a
very positive understanding of each other's political positions. I have
to confess, however, that I have not had the opportunity to have a
similar conversation with a White Nationalist and do not know if it is
even possible. This is one of the reasons that I have agreed to do this
interview. I personally believe that all three groups are fighting for
the same things and that mutually beneficial arrangements can be found.
I really believe that all three groups are ultimately fighting the same
enemy. I do not believe that the enemy is each other. Much of the 'hate'
demonstrated by some within each group against the other groups is
mostly programmed by the real enemy in order to divide and rule. There
is much that can be accomplished through respectful dialogue. This will
help us to defeat our common enemy."

That's significant. You wouldn't have seen that ten years ago or even
two years ago. Ten years ago, you wouldn't have seen such understanding
between Arab nationalists and White nationalists as you see today. You
wouldn't have seen Palestinian flags at White nationalist rallies. Does
that mean that we Whites are willing to mix with Mestizos or Semites?
Hardly. That's not true at all. But we can see the new lines of conflict
that are forming in the world today. The internationalist Jews, whether
they call themselves capitalist or communist, are the enemies of all
nations and all peoples. It's similar to what I said on this program ten
years ago, and have been saying ever since. "Every people that thinks of
itself as a people should, to the maximum extent possible, live under
its own government." The only serious disagreements with that maxim come
from traitorous money-men who've sold out their peoples for profit, and
from Jews. The disputes between most of the peoples of the world, and
even the peoples who have been tragically and unnaturally thrown
together in North America and more recently in Europe, can probably be
solved over a negotiating table before the battlefield has to be
resorted to. The only ones who won't be willing to negotiate at all are
those whose unique mode of existence makes them need to live among other
peoples as parasites and hidden controllers. They have set themselves up
as the enemies of mankind and they are going to have to pay the price
for that.

The Jews have one egregious fault: they go too far, they overplay their
hand. Their arrogance and their egotism and their "chutzpah" often
combine to make them blunder. And when they blunder, their sanctimonious
moralizing is revealed for the phony and ugly thing that it really is.
The Jews aren't holding five diamonds. They're holding four diamonds and
the deuce of clubs. They're four-flushers and they know it. And
increasingly the rest of us know it, too.

NA