Skip to content or view screen version

Saddam pays Gaddafi $3 billion for safe haven in Libya

Michael Evans, Defence Editor | 16.11.2002 14:29

SADDAM HUSSEIN has made secret plans for his family and leading members of his regime to be given political asylum in Libya in the event of a war with America or a successful internal coup in Baghdad.

The extraordinary steps taken by the Iraqi leader to provide an exit strategy for key relatives and associates, which includes paying $3.5 billion (£2.3 billion) into Libyan banks, provide the first evidence that Saddam is now facing up to the prospect of being toppled from power.

Even as he makes public statements of defiance and vows to defend his country against an American invasion, The Times has learnt that Saddam’s secret emissaries have been visiting Libya and Syria to ensure that there is an escape route for his family and top cronies.

The deal with Tripoli does not include providing refuge for Saddam or for Uday, his eldest son. If either were to seek political asylum in Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi would come under intense international pressure, particularly from Washington, to hand them over for war crimes.

Word of Saddam’s deal with the Libyan leader has emerged from diplomatic sources in Tripoli following a visit to the Libyan capital on September 8 by General Ali Hasan al-Majid, a cousin and trusted member of Saddam’s clan.

General al-Majid is known by the Kurds of northern Iraq as “Chemical Ali” because he was in charge of the Iraqi forces which launched a chemical weapons attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988. He was also initially the “Governor” of Kuwait after Iraq’s invasion of the Gulf state in August 1990, and is now one of the Baath Party regional command leaders. He is believed to have travelled to Tripoli to deliver a personal missive from Saddam to the Libyan leader, confirming the arrangements for his family.

The sources said that in return for the $3.5 billion deposited in Libyan bank accounts, Colonel Gaddafi has agreed to give sanctuary to members of Saddam’s family and to about a dozen senior officials of the Baghdad regime, with their families.

The sources said they believed the regime members would include Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister, Naji Sabri, the Foreign Minister, and Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, deputy chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council. The other officials were believed to be less well known members of the ruling Baath Party’s regional command.

In a separate arrangement, said to have been agreed in October during a visit by senior Iraqi officials to Damascus, an overland escape route was devised. It would involve Saddam’s family members and regime leaders travelling from Tikrit, home of the Saddam clan, to the Syrian border via the Badiyat al-Sham desert which divides Syria from Iraq.

It is not clear whether the sanctuary deal includes Qusay Hussein, the Iraqi leader’s second — and favourite — son.

However, the diplomatic sources said that if Saddam felt his regime was about to collapse, he would do his utmost to see that his family escaped, especially Qusay, as well as Ali, his youngest son, and his grandchildren.

Western intelligence services assume that Saddam will stay “to the bitter end” if Iraq is attacked by a US-led coalition. Two months ago, Abbas Khalaf, Iraq’s Ambassador to Moscow, denied that Saddam would ever abandon his country in time of need. This followed reports in France that Uday Hussein had gone to Moscow to seek a future refuge for him and his father.

Intelligence sources said yesterday that the French reports were not credible. But they confirmed that the evidence of a deal for Saddam’s family to go to Libya fitted in with information gleaned in recent weeks.

The intelligence sources said that individual members of Baghdad’s Baath Party were known to be looking for potential “boltholes” in North African countries. They said that Libya made sense as a place to seek sanctuary, because many of the countries in North Africa were friendly to the West and would probably hand over wanted members of the Iraqi regime.

Michael Evans, Defence Editor
- Homepage: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-481908,00.html

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

I don´t belive in Saddam any more

17.11.2002 00:50

A few weeks ago I got connected to some really nice people in Karlsbaden, who seemed to display an awareness concerning world politics. As I DO care about peace and sincerely believe in pacifist methods, I joined them for a trip down Florence, you know for what.
But what has been achieved?
Saddam welcomes our loud uncompromising protests, but is he willing to ease the burdens of the iraqis?
I´m beginning to feel a bit sceptical concerning this matter - and I DO regret my participiation in that action down in the magnificent city of Florence.
Please count me out. You´re a bunch of hypocrites.

Tom


From the Murdoch Bullshit Factory

17.11.2002 10:18

Oh yes, we'll be having stories about Saddam and Gaddafy eating babies next, the brutes.

Even the war mongering BBC could see through this story, though that didn't stop them repeating it with a nice big headline.

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2483603.stm

Personally, I'm in favour of charging Saddam Hussein with war crimes, together with all the businessman and government officials who assissted him at the height of his atrocities. Especially nasty punishments will be reserved for the editors of newspapers who looked the other way while the left pointed these atrocities out.

That includes Murdoch's Times and, of course, it's owner.

Auntie Beeb


I don't believe in Bush or Blair any more

17.11.2002 15:57

Hi "Tom":

I don't believe in Bush or Blair anymore (nor the Sunday Times which runs whatever is leaked to them)

Propaganda extravaganza-- its going to be coming from every direction in the next few months. The problem for you people is that we know what you want: our support for your murderous war. You won't get it, whatever weasily lies you circulate

And Tom, perhaps you should have added your contribution to this thread?:

 http://uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=46695&group=webcast

Ghost Buster


libya denies asylum deal

18.11.2002 05:51

TRIPOLI - Libya dismissed as 'fiction' a British newspaper report that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein plans to pay Tripoli billions of dollars in return for political asylum for his family and senior members of his regime in the event of any US-led war.

'This information is completely unfounded and is aimed at tarnishing Libya's image,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassuna Shawush said on Saturday, commenting on the report in The Times.

'This is fabricated information, it is fiction,' he added, denying that the subject was discussed during talks between Iraqi envoy Ali Hassan al-Majid and Libyan leaders on Sept 8.

General Majid came to Tripoli solely 'to explain developments' concerning the US threats to strike Iraq, Mr Shawush said.

The Times said the deal, which would also cover an internal coup d'etat, would see the Iraqi leader pay US$3.5 billion (S$6.17 billion) for safe haven for his family and about a dozen senior officials of the Baghdad regime and their families.

The deal does not include plans to provide refuge to Mr Saddam or his eldest son Uday, according to The Times.

It said diplomatic sources in Tripoli had told the paper that the Iraqi leader's secret emissaries had visited Libya and Syria to discuss an escape route.

The Times said any deal to provide refuge to Mr Saddam or Mr Uday would lead to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi coming under international pressure to hand them over for war crimes trials.

It quoted unnamed Western intelligence sources as saying that individual members of Baghdad's Ba'ath Party were known to be looking to take refuge in North African countries, but Libya made more sense because many North African states were friendly towards the West and might hand them over. --AFP

 http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/iraq/story/0,1870,155553,00.html

brian