Skip to content or view screen version

Moon Landing Out-take

Buzz Lightyear | 12.11.2002 18:52

A very interesting video clip on the moon landing hoax (it's looking worse for NASA all the time)

Moon Landing Out-take
Moon Landing Out-take


If you're at this page because you've just seen an amazing piece of footage showing the Apollo 11 moonlanding to have been shot in a studio, then read on. If you haven't seen the clip, click the link below, and prepare to be amazed.

At 4:17 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on July 20, 1969 Neil Armstrong was seen on television by millions of people around the world apparently walking on the surface of the moon, and making one giant leap into the pages of history. BUT DID HE? Conspiracy theories abound on the Internet.

The piece of footage you just saw answers the question - but raises a lot of others. We don't know the answers to all these questions - but here is what we do know:

1) Is it real?
Yes. This footage was clearly shot in a studio, and is clearly meant to represent the Apollo 11 moon landing. The attention to detail is staggering. The intention is clearly to fool viewers into believing that it is genuine.

2) Is it conclusive?
No. There is no proof that because this was shot in a studio, the moon landing was necessarily faked. But we do know that the original non-digital footage was destroyed and that certain (dangerous) people are very angry that this clip has leaked.

3) How did we get it?
We did not get it directly from a NASA source. Our source is well placed to vouch for the authenticity of the footage and had links with the makers of 2 recent documentaries, one for the BBC and one for CNN about the moonlanding conspiracies. We cannot possibly reveal his identity, and probably never will be able to. His position is more dangerous than you might imagine.

4) Why haven't I seen it before?
The footage has been buried for over 30 years. All the original stock, except this cut, was destroyed. We have had it for over 2 years and in that time have (anonymously) approached almost every large TV network owner to sell the rights. Without exception they were interested and offered to buy it. At one point they were also Then, also without exception they changed their minds and started to try to find out who we were. At that point we stopped dealing with them. It was scary as hell.

5) How, when and where was it made?
It was made in 1965, judging by the camera it was shot on - an Ikegami Tube Camera. We have evidence that the footage was shot outside the US - possibly in Europe, by a foreign crew.

6) Who is inside the suit?
Not one of the original astronauts. In fact, they are totally unaware that this footage was ever shot. The guy in the suit is an actor called Symond Lewis.

7) Why is it on the Internet and not on TV?
See point 4

8) What is NASA's reaction to this footage?
They have refused to comment. But we have recently heard that they are stepping up efforts on a huge PR campaign to convince us all that the Apollo moonlandings all took place.

Buzz Lightyear
- Homepage: http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

wgwrg

12.11.2002 19:25

Nasa now get so many enquiries about the faking of the landings, their writing a book to try to debunk the conspiracy theories. Apparently teachers don't know what to tell their pupils anymore - fucking great !

See article from the guardian below. This book just ligitimises the stance of the critics! I wonder what they teach school kids in Russia, China, Iraq etc etc about all this!


Were the lunar landings faked?

This week Buzz Aldrin, 72, punched a man who suggested that the missions to the moon were a hoax. But does anyone still believe that old chestnut? Yes indeed, finds Stuart Jeffries

Friday September 13, 2002
The Guardian

In 1968, the film director Stanley Kubrick was secretly approached by Nasa officials. They asked him to direct the first three moon landings from a special set. As a result, Kubrick worked for 16 months at a specially-built sound stage in Huntsville, Alabama, creating footage of the Apollo 11 and 12 missions. In July 1969, a Saturn V rocket with Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins on board was launched into a low orbit and remained there while Kubrick's footage was released to the media. The three men made a perfect splash down in the Pacific after millions of television viewers had been captivated by the so-called moon landing. Months afterwards, he filmed the Apollo 12 mission in the same way
This, at least, is the theory of an American called Great North Wind, writing at www.galactic-guide.com, and you have to admit it makes a great deal of sense. After all, as many moon landing hoax theorists point out, Nasa had to do something. American pride had been twice humbled - by Yuri Gagarin in space and by Charlie Cong in Nam.

That said, there are holes in Great North Wind's theory. He continues: "Kubrick refused to direct the Apollo 13 mission, however, because Nasa officials rejected his screenplay in which the Apollo 13 mission fails. Ironically, Nasa later decided to use the failed-mission scenario, for which Randall Cunningham - a little known but highly respected British director - was recruited to direct.

Extensive research has found that Cunningham is not a highly respected British director but an occasionally brilliant former quarterback for the Baltimore Ravens. Mr (or possibly Ms) Wind is possibly hoaxing us with his moon landing hoax. But we may never know the truth: Kubrick is now dead, which makes it hard to check, and Great North Wind has not replied to my emails.

You may think Wind's theory is a little far-fetched, but if you are so clever, how do you explain the fact that OJ Simpson was framed for murder by the US government? If you accept the account set out at www.straightdope.com, it was because Simpson helped to expose the lie that Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon. How did he do that? By appearing in Peter Hyams' 1978 film Capricorn One. In that picture, Simpson, along with Sam Waterston and James Brolin, plays an astronaut forced to stage the first manned mission to Mars in a desert. But the men decide not to play ball, and go on the run pursued by government hit-men. But if this film was an embarrassment to the US government, why did it wait until 1995 to frame Simpson for murder? And why didn't Waterston, Hyams and Brolin get framed too? The people at Straight Dope haven't returned my calls.

This many-tentacled conspiracy becomes a topical issue now that alleged Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin has thumped a man who claimed that his moon landing was actually filmed in the Nevada desert. This man, one Bart Sibrel, has made documentaries called A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land On the Moon? and confronted Aldrin, 72, in a Beverly Hills hotel earlier this week. Sibrel, 37, demanded that Aldrin swear on a Bible that he had really landed on the moon. Aldrin declined to do so, and then his fist really landed on Sibrel's face.

Sibrel claims to have uncovered 33-year-old footage that shows the Apollo 11 crew falsifying part of their photography. Which at least might get Kubrick off the hook. He claims that the Apollo 11 crew put a transparency of the Earth in front of their space-capsule window and then taped the transparency as they made a "journey" to the moon.

"Surrounding the Earth, beginning at an altitude of 1,000 miles and extending an additional 25,000 miles, lie lethal bands of radiation called the Van Allen radiation belts," Sibrel tells me. "Recently uncovered footage of the crew of the Apollo 11 staging part of their mission proves that the astronauts never made it beyond Earth orbit."

But the hoax didn't end there. Footage purportedly from the moon shows the US flag fluttering in the lunar breeze. "How could there be a breeze when there is no atmosphere?" Sibrel asks. Sibrel is one of many who believe the moon remains untouched by human space-boot. Ralph Rene, author of Nasa Mooned America, says that Nasa photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight, but they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect, he claims.

But the best hoax theorist is Bill Kaysing, author of We Never Went to the Moon. He claims: "The astronauts would have been overwhelmed by the sight of trillions of stars. But not one picture has ever come back from the alleged trip to the moon showing the stars in all their magnificence, nor do any of the astronauts comment on the stars."

Kaysing reckons that the Challenger space shuttle really did blow up in 1981, but that it was no accident. It was exploded by Nasa because "Christa McAuliffe, the only civilian and only woman aboard, refused to go along with the lie that you couldn't see stars in space. So they blew her up, along with six other people, to keep that lie under wraps."

Murders, trick photography, the possible involvement of a secretive top film director, a massive fiction by hundreds of conspirators over more than 33 years - the moon landing hoax was a remarkable achievement. Almost as remarkable as landing a man on the moon.

wrgrggfa
- Homepage: http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,791222,00.html


look

13.11.2002 14:33

this clip looks like an out-take from CAPRICORN V, a partly watchable film from the 1970s, unfortunately starring telly savalas (and even worse, o j simpson of all people). capricorn STARTED the whole thing about faked moon landings (Nasa realises a planned Mars mission is doomed, so they hoax the whole event) unfortunately, the film wanders from an entertaining conspiracy story and ends a desert chase yarn, even with a 'happy ending'.

the dark 4, says


It'll be alright on the night

14.11.2002 13:03

An outake from Capricorn V? Sorry, my memory doesn't serve me too well here but did the astronaut say "One small step" in Capricorn V?

Aunties Bloomers