Oppression of every culture and creed in Britain
LI | 05.11.2002 20:52
Why multiracialism always leads down the road of oppression
One of the more unpalatable sides to a multiracial society, aside from the inherent high crime rate, increasing racial tension as the years progress – sometimes pronounced and sometimes under the surface, ever increasing AIDS infection rates, alienation of ordinary British people in their own country and our eventual extinction, are the tools that are used to keep the system together.
The tools the system uses to keep multiracialism under control are like silk-sheathed rusty daggers – under a veil of smooth talk and spin is a blunt and dirty tool of tyranny. Just like the sharp cold knives used to stab Ross Parker to death in a dark subway earlier this year, the system has its own weaponry.
Anyone who dares speak out is persecuted, anyone who steps out of line vilified, and the full legal and media weaponry of the system is always at hand to deal with “racists”. Anyone who needs confirmation of this need only look at how the media deals with the BNP, we can’t be prosecuted as we’re not breaking the law, so the media is the tool used to discredit our organisation. For those who speak out, speech crime laws are used, which carry prison sentences for anyone who says or writes anything which “might incite racial hatred”, whether it’s true or not! To keep the general population in line, and prevent the inevitable consequence of multiracialism: race war, tough punishments are doled out to anyone who acts in a way which might weaken the multiracial society. This is seen on both sides of racial divide although usually against whites, the long jail terms given to Asian rioters involved in causing the race riots last year were designed to scare away anyone else who dared riot in future – white or Asian, rioting weakens the multiracial society and encourages people who would normally not care to face a few racial realities (in fact, the race riots were one of the many things that helped me wake up and smell the coffee). This is not to say that violence is the way forward, the violent old methods used years ago by nationalists didn’t work, if they had worked we’d be in government now! The new approaches are helping Euro-nationalists sweep across Europe, picking up massive votes such as Le Pen’s second place in the French presidential elections.
Another development to this are so called “hate crimes”, where it is almost exclusively white people who are punished and ethnic minorities (who actually commit far more racist attacks) are let off. Most will be aware of the recent “bungle” involving the police in Oldham “loosing” the files on the three Islamic extremists who murdered Mark Clayton in cold blood, and the charges against the four Islamic extremists who butchered Gavin Hopley in Burnley. Letting Asians get away with murder – and that’s just a couple of examples, while black gang rapists get off on bail, would lead you to believe the legal system has suddenly decided to stop punishing people for breaking the law, you’d be forgiven for thinking that, seeing as any attempt to bring anyone from an ethnic minority to justice is seen as “racist”. However, fear not, the legal system does actually imprison the perpetrators of violent and horrific crimes, two white men who used the word “nigger” and threw some Coke at a black man are now safely behind bars and facing a long prison sentence1, London’s wonderfully law abiding and drug-free Afro-Caribbean population can now walk the streets at night safe in the knowledge that their sportswear will not be stained by Coca Cola – except for perhaps a bit of blood from all the innocent bystanders their more unsavoury tribesmen “take out” next time they decide to have a war between cocaine dealers2. Now you know what the legal system really cares about, and it isn’t the hardworking British taxpayers, it’s keeping the multiracial society together (while allowing lots of “reparations” and race attacks to be committed against whites, who, according to liberals, deserve it.).
A quick look back into history at the world’s multiracial societies brings-up one interesting fact – all multiracial societies that lasted for any length of time did so under oppression and denial of freedom. Yugoslavia, perhaps the most famous European multiracial meltdown of the past decade, is a classic example. For years Yugoslavia was a Communist republic affiliated to the Soviet Union, under a dictatorial Communist government led by Tito. The different ethnic, religious, national and language groups coexisted in relative peace, but the trade-off was their liberties and rights as groups. As a result, shortly after the end of Communist oppression, the pressure-cooker burst its valve and Yugoslavia then entered one of the most brutal, bloody and dark periods in its history, the result of years of forced multiculturalism. Thoughtful readers might notice that the EU of today is very similar to the old Yugoslavia – a group of different nations, languages, religions, and races (as a result of suicidally high immigration levels) forced together under a centralised undemocratic leadership.
Another multiracial basket-case is South Africa, which was, under white rule, a relatively peaceful a prosperous nation, and the economic powerhouse for Africa. As much as I have a great admiration for the Europeans who built a western nation out of plains and jungle, they made one grave mistake. Their mistake was to permit a multiracial South Africa, in the false hope that it could be sustained forever. As much as some people may find the prospect of using an entire race of people to do their dirty work palatable, it carries a fair few disadvantages. First of all, the segregationist approach used by the whites in South Africa didn’t tackle the root cause of the racial problems – multiracialism, having large numbers of different races living together always results in tension and in the end one group must win-out, they can’t coexist forever. Segregating the races on the same turf isn’t the solution, it’s just another layer of oppression used to keep the multiracial system going. Whites in South Africa, for most of the apartheid period wanted a multiracial South Africa, as long as they were the ones holding the whip. This approach has been proven time and again to be completely misguided, it is unsustainable, the blacks had a higher birth rate than the whites, and through force of numbers defeated the whites (after a fair amount of Communist help along the way). Now, whites in South Africa are reaping the rewards of their strategy, and are among the most murdered group in the world – down to the fact that
1. They surrendered and appeased the black militants, loosing the respect they had over the blacks.
2. The fact that they are the minority in a multiracial society and are now under the whip, a vulnerable minority in a country with a Communist government wants to see rid of them.
The only way forward, the nationalist way forward, is to completely remove the whip from the equation and work towards ending multiracialism and its ugly sisters: exploitation, destruction and oppression. This would be far better for all races involved. From this, you can now see how the multiracialists operate. Tyranny is the only tool available to keep unsustainable societies together, and those who use it hope that by the time it all implodes, they will have long lined their pockets with their blood money. While pensioners and young people are robbed and murdered by primeval black street gangs, scarce police resources are being diverted into trendy “Community Safety Units”. The units of course aren’t there for the safety of the local community; they are there to protect special-status minority “communities”. The trend of whites who commit offences which aren’t politically correct being savaged by multiracial juries and liberal judges, while rapists and paedophiles are allowed bail will only continue until we put stop to the system which is sustaining this madness. The liberals will stop at nothing when it comes to dealing with their enemies, in the words of Andrew Marr, a rabid multiracialist, and now the BBC’s political editor:
" . . . the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state
power to coerce and repress . . . I firmly believe that repression can be a
great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain
'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
From the horse’s mouth we can see the true nature of the beast, and what a beast it is, one that will eventually destroy Britain and the west as we know it. Know your enemy and learn its techniques, because one day you could be on the receiving end of its claws. The choice is clear, freedom and multiracialism can never exist together for very long, which one do you choose?
- The Logical Idealist
[1] David Norris and Neil Acourt were recently convicted for shouting “nigger” at a black off-duty police officer and throwing Coke at him. While I don’t justify racial attacks or abuse at all, or want to try and cover for two individuals who probably did kill Steven Lawrence, their offence was a very minor one compared with rape or violent assault, for which many ethnic minority suspects have been allowed bail. This case demonstrates the bias towards punishing people convicted of “non-pc” crimes as opposed to serious crime.
[2] “Nine injured in ‘Yardie’ shooting”, BBC, 31st of July 2000:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/859574.stm
One of the more unpalatable sides to a multiracial society, aside from the inherent high crime rate, increasing racial tension as the years progress – sometimes pronounced and sometimes under the surface, ever increasing AIDS infection rates, alienation of ordinary British people in their own country and our eventual extinction, are the tools that are used to keep the system together.
The tools the system uses to keep multiracialism under control are like silk-sheathed rusty daggers – under a veil of smooth talk and spin is a blunt and dirty tool of tyranny. Just like the sharp cold knives used to stab Ross Parker to death in a dark subway earlier this year, the system has its own weaponry.
Anyone who dares speak out is persecuted, anyone who steps out of line vilified, and the full legal and media weaponry of the system is always at hand to deal with “racists”. Anyone who needs confirmation of this need only look at how the media deals with the BNP, we can’t be prosecuted as we’re not breaking the law, so the media is the tool used to discredit our organisation. For those who speak out, speech crime laws are used, which carry prison sentences for anyone who says or writes anything which “might incite racial hatred”, whether it’s true or not! To keep the general population in line, and prevent the inevitable consequence of multiracialism: race war, tough punishments are doled out to anyone who acts in a way which might weaken the multiracial society. This is seen on both sides of racial divide although usually against whites, the long jail terms given to Asian rioters involved in causing the race riots last year were designed to scare away anyone else who dared riot in future – white or Asian, rioting weakens the multiracial society and encourages people who would normally not care to face a few racial realities (in fact, the race riots were one of the many things that helped me wake up and smell the coffee). This is not to say that violence is the way forward, the violent old methods used years ago by nationalists didn’t work, if they had worked we’d be in government now! The new approaches are helping Euro-nationalists sweep across Europe, picking up massive votes such as Le Pen’s second place in the French presidential elections.
Another development to this are so called “hate crimes”, where it is almost exclusively white people who are punished and ethnic minorities (who actually commit far more racist attacks) are let off. Most will be aware of the recent “bungle” involving the police in Oldham “loosing” the files on the three Islamic extremists who murdered Mark Clayton in cold blood, and the charges against the four Islamic extremists who butchered Gavin Hopley in Burnley. Letting Asians get away with murder – and that’s just a couple of examples, while black gang rapists get off on bail, would lead you to believe the legal system has suddenly decided to stop punishing people for breaking the law, you’d be forgiven for thinking that, seeing as any attempt to bring anyone from an ethnic minority to justice is seen as “racist”. However, fear not, the legal system does actually imprison the perpetrators of violent and horrific crimes, two white men who used the word “nigger” and threw some Coke at a black man are now safely behind bars and facing a long prison sentence1, London’s wonderfully law abiding and drug-free Afro-Caribbean population can now walk the streets at night safe in the knowledge that their sportswear will not be stained by Coca Cola – except for perhaps a bit of blood from all the innocent bystanders their more unsavoury tribesmen “take out” next time they decide to have a war between cocaine dealers2. Now you know what the legal system really cares about, and it isn’t the hardworking British taxpayers, it’s keeping the multiracial society together (while allowing lots of “reparations” and race attacks to be committed against whites, who, according to liberals, deserve it.).
A quick look back into history at the world’s multiracial societies brings-up one interesting fact – all multiracial societies that lasted for any length of time did so under oppression and denial of freedom. Yugoslavia, perhaps the most famous European multiracial meltdown of the past decade, is a classic example. For years Yugoslavia was a Communist republic affiliated to the Soviet Union, under a dictatorial Communist government led by Tito. The different ethnic, religious, national and language groups coexisted in relative peace, but the trade-off was their liberties and rights as groups. As a result, shortly after the end of Communist oppression, the pressure-cooker burst its valve and Yugoslavia then entered one of the most brutal, bloody and dark periods in its history, the result of years of forced multiculturalism. Thoughtful readers might notice that the EU of today is very similar to the old Yugoslavia – a group of different nations, languages, religions, and races (as a result of suicidally high immigration levels) forced together under a centralised undemocratic leadership.
Another multiracial basket-case is South Africa, which was, under white rule, a relatively peaceful a prosperous nation, and the economic powerhouse for Africa. As much as I have a great admiration for the Europeans who built a western nation out of plains and jungle, they made one grave mistake. Their mistake was to permit a multiracial South Africa, in the false hope that it could be sustained forever. As much as some people may find the prospect of using an entire race of people to do their dirty work palatable, it carries a fair few disadvantages. First of all, the segregationist approach used by the whites in South Africa didn’t tackle the root cause of the racial problems – multiracialism, having large numbers of different races living together always results in tension and in the end one group must win-out, they can’t coexist forever. Segregating the races on the same turf isn’t the solution, it’s just another layer of oppression used to keep the multiracial system going. Whites in South Africa, for most of the apartheid period wanted a multiracial South Africa, as long as they were the ones holding the whip. This approach has been proven time and again to be completely misguided, it is unsustainable, the blacks had a higher birth rate than the whites, and through force of numbers defeated the whites (after a fair amount of Communist help along the way). Now, whites in South Africa are reaping the rewards of their strategy, and are among the most murdered group in the world – down to the fact that
1. They surrendered and appeased the black militants, loosing the respect they had over the blacks.
2. The fact that they are the minority in a multiracial society and are now under the whip, a vulnerable minority in a country with a Communist government wants to see rid of them.
The only way forward, the nationalist way forward, is to completely remove the whip from the equation and work towards ending multiracialism and its ugly sisters: exploitation, destruction and oppression. This would be far better for all races involved. From this, you can now see how the multiracialists operate. Tyranny is the only tool available to keep unsustainable societies together, and those who use it hope that by the time it all implodes, they will have long lined their pockets with their blood money. While pensioners and young people are robbed and murdered by primeval black street gangs, scarce police resources are being diverted into trendy “Community Safety Units”. The units of course aren’t there for the safety of the local community; they are there to protect special-status minority “communities”. The trend of whites who commit offences which aren’t politically correct being savaged by multiracial juries and liberal judges, while rapists and paedophiles are allowed bail will only continue until we put stop to the system which is sustaining this madness. The liberals will stop at nothing when it comes to dealing with their enemies, in the words of Andrew Marr, a rabid multiracialist, and now the BBC’s political editor:
" . . . the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state
power to coerce and repress . . . I firmly believe that repression can be a
great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain
'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
From the horse’s mouth we can see the true nature of the beast, and what a beast it is, one that will eventually destroy Britain and the west as we know it. Know your enemy and learn its techniques, because one day you could be on the receiving end of its claws. The choice is clear, freedom and multiracialism can never exist together for very long, which one do you choose?
- The Logical Idealist
[1] David Norris and Neil Acourt were recently convicted for shouting “nigger” at a black off-duty police officer and throwing Coke at him. While I don’t justify racial attacks or abuse at all, or want to try and cover for two individuals who probably did kill Steven Lawrence, their offence was a very minor one compared with rape or violent assault, for which many ethnic minority suspects have been allowed bail. This case demonstrates the bias towards punishing people convicted of “non-pc” crimes as opposed to serious crime.
[2] “Nine injured in ‘Yardie’ shooting”, BBC, 31st of July 2000:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/859574.stm
LI
Comments
Display the following comment