This is what caused the terrorist attack in Bali
Harlequin | 16.10.2002 20:57
Terrorism breeds out of conditions of poverty and hopelessness and there are plenty of people in Indonesia who have good reason to hate Western governments and big business.
Its economy has been devastated by the huge financial crisis that swept Asia in 1997. Millions of people were thrown out of work, with many facing hunger. Indonesia's currency collapsed. It couldn't pay its enormous debts. Mass demonstrations followed. An occupation of parliament and clashes with the army drove Indonesia's dictator General Suharto from power in 1998. Many people still live in dire poverty in Indonesia. This is because the current president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, is continuing with an austerity programme backed by the International Monetary Fund. Indonesia's government is also continuing its repression of movements demanding independence, such as in the oil-rich Aceh province. Tragically, some of them may have directed their anger in awful fashion at ordinary holidaymakers.
The bombing of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and the continuing misery imposed on millions of people by the policies of the IMF and the World Bank has only increased that despair. People are driven to acts of violence by a system that forces them to watch their children die of needless hunger and curable diseases. They have to endure living in filthy shanty town hovels within sight of luxury hotels.
They suffer humiliation at the hands of the pampered rich and see all hope of living a secure life stolen from them by multinational companies which ruthlessly defend their profits. These are people desperate for some change for themselves and their families, but they can see no way of achieving it. Faced with this situation, some people can be driven to take part of the brutality the system dishes out and seek to hurl it back at their oppressors. When people lash out, they rarely hit those really responsible for their hopelessness. Instead they often cause the deaths of other ordinary people. Such acts also have no effect on stopping repressing powers from imposing their will on the world.
But there is a different way, one that builds on hope and not despair. It was seen on the streets of London on Saturday 28 September when over 400,000 people marched against war on Iraq. And it could be seen in the many huge anti-capitalist movements that have mobilised millions of people across the developed and less developed world in the last three years.
It is this kind of collective opposition that can provide inspiration and hope to all those suffering. It can show that there is an effective way of challenging inequality, injustice, capitalism and war. In Britain that means involving the widest number of people in the 31 October day of action against the war on Iraq. If the anti-war movement can force Tony Blair to reassess his support for Bush that would send out a fantastic message to the poor and oppressed around the world.
The bombing of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and the continuing misery imposed on millions of people by the policies of the IMF and the World Bank has only increased that despair. People are driven to acts of violence by a system that forces them to watch their children die of needless hunger and curable diseases. They have to endure living in filthy shanty town hovels within sight of luxury hotels.
They suffer humiliation at the hands of the pampered rich and see all hope of living a secure life stolen from them by multinational companies which ruthlessly defend their profits. These are people desperate for some change for themselves and their families, but they can see no way of achieving it. Faced with this situation, some people can be driven to take part of the brutality the system dishes out and seek to hurl it back at their oppressors. When people lash out, they rarely hit those really responsible for their hopelessness. Instead they often cause the deaths of other ordinary people. Such acts also have no effect on stopping repressing powers from imposing their will on the world.
But there is a different way, one that builds on hope and not despair. It was seen on the streets of London on Saturday 28 September when over 400,000 people marched against war on Iraq. And it could be seen in the many huge anti-capitalist movements that have mobilised millions of people across the developed and less developed world in the last three years.
It is this kind of collective opposition that can provide inspiration and hope to all those suffering. It can show that there is an effective way of challenging inequality, injustice, capitalism and war. In Britain that means involving the widest number of people in the 31 October day of action against the war on Iraq. If the anti-war movement can force Tony Blair to reassess his support for Bush that would send out a fantastic message to the poor and oppressed around the world.
Harlequin
Homepage:
http://www.stopwar.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
MI5
16.10.2002 21:23
Just one little thing........ These people are so poor that they can afford the connections let alone the money to purchase the C4..
We know it was (your) the Insercurity Firms (CIA/MI6/MOSSAD). This bomb was just too convenient for the powers that be(Bilderberg). This was just what was neccessary to get the majority population of OZ and the rest of us on side, well done BOYS u done a great job!
Not Fooled
Escaping reality
17.10.2002 11:53
Undoubtedly, they use poverty as a recruiting ground, but most of the poor in these countries abhor terrorism as much as they have contempt for their own governments. They are often unwittingly caught in the cross-fire, too scared to make a stand and raise their voices. Moreover, these groups are controlled by a rich, intellectual elite. Osama Bin-Laden was no slum-dweller.
Whoever wrote this article obviously has not visited the developing world. Rather than listen to the men with guns who always appear in the media, take a trip to Congo or Kashmir and listen to what ordinary people have to say. Most of them just want to live in peace and have their basic needs fulfilled without having to struggle.
Dan
Back to the point
17.10.2002 16:33
Many of the people killed in Bali were budget long term travellers who are the positive type of tourist that spends money which ends up directly or not so directly in the pockets of local ordinary people i.e. small guesthouses, cafes and cheap resturaunts. Unlike the sterile all inclusive hotel chains which were built by foreign investment and subsequently takes profits abroad.
It's illogical and suspicious that firstly, this was not a legitamate target for terrorists (why not embassies, multinational businesses or even 5 star hotels?). Secondly, why use such expensive and difficult to acquire (for non-govermental terrorists) plastic explosives when a simple homemade nail bomb would have just the same deadly impact (remember old compton street?). Thirdly, what about the expertise required in handling the explosive and detenator. Finally I have recently come back from India and the violence is not just located in Kashmir, it's everywhere but I never heard of any of the fundamentalists (on either side and there's many) using C4. Incidently where have we heard of even the most educated affluent terrorists using such sophisticated wepons? Only the military. So was it the Indonesian goverment willingly destroying it's own tourist economy? Not likely.
So who really benifits from this?
Who have we heard in the media in the last few days using this attrocity to push through their extremely unpopular policies?
james
According to Plan
17.10.2002 18:28
woo-hoo
Going on holiday in a Third Word country
17.10.2002 21:46
Mutley