Skip to content or view screen version

This is what caused the terrorist attack in Bali

Harlequin | 16.10.2002 20:57

Terrorism breeds out of conditions of poverty and hopelessness and there are plenty of people in Indonesia who have good reason to hate Western governments and big business.

Its economy has been devastated by the huge financial crisis that swept Asia in 1997. Millions of people were thrown out of work, with many facing hunger. Indonesia's currency collapsed. It couldn't pay its enormous debts. Mass demonstrations followed. An occupation of parliament and clashes with the army drove Indonesia's dictator General Suharto from power in 1998. Many people still live in dire poverty in Indonesia. This is because the current president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, is continuing with an austerity programme backed by the International Monetary Fund. Indonesia's government is also continuing its repression of movements demanding independence, such as in the oil-rich Aceh province. Tragically, some of them may have directed their anger in awful fashion at ordinary holidaymakers.

The bombing of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and the continuing misery imposed on millions of people by the policies of the IMF and the World Bank has only increased that despair. People are driven to acts of violence by a system that forces them to watch their children die of needless hunger and curable diseases. They have to endure living in filthy shanty town hovels within sight of luxury hotels.

They suffer humiliation at the hands of the pampered rich and see all hope of living a secure life stolen from them by multinational companies which ruthlessly defend their profits. These are people desperate for some change for themselves and their families, but they can see no way of achieving it. Faced with this situation, some people can be driven to take part of the brutality the system dishes out and seek to hurl it back at their oppressors. When people lash out, they rarely hit those really responsible for their hopelessness. Instead they often cause the deaths of other ordinary people. Such acts also have no effect on stopping repressing powers from imposing their will on the world.

But there is a different way, one that builds on hope and not despair. It was seen on the streets of London on Saturday 28 September when over 400,000 people marched against war on Iraq. And it could be seen in the many huge anti-capitalist movements that have mobilised millions of people across the developed and less developed world in the last three years.

It is this kind of collective opposition that can provide inspiration and hope to all those suffering. It can show that there is an effective way of challenging inequality, injustice, capitalism and war. In Britain that means involving the widest number of people in the 31 October day of action against the war on Iraq. If the anti-war movement can force Tony Blair to reassess his support for Bush that would send out a fantastic message to the poor and oppressed around the world.

Harlequin
- Homepage: http://www.stopwar.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

MI5

16.10.2002 21:23

Very Good Effort, Your Superiors will be pleased.

Just one little thing........ These people are so poor that they can afford the connections let alone the money to purchase the C4..

We know it was (your) the Insercurity Firms (CIA/MI6/MOSSAD). This bomb was just too convenient for the powers that be(Bilderberg). This was just what was neccessary to get the majority population of OZ and the rest of us on side, well done BOYS u done a great job!

Not Fooled


Escaping reality

17.10.2002 11:53

It is simplistic to suggest that terrorist groups are formed by the oppressed masses, because that is their only hope for survival. Terrorists are often as self-serving, arrogant, oppressive and as rich as the governments they purportedly oppose. Take Colombia's Farc. Any notion that they are a vanguard of the masses has long been undermined by their quest for the preservation of their rule in a large part of Colombia. The resource that keeps them fighting is coccaine and kid-napping. Drugs are also behind terrorism in Northern Ireland - note the gang-land fighting between loyalists over control of drugs and prostitution. The Islamic fundamentalist groups are similar, although their ideology is more akin to Nazism - they are xenophobic, racist, anti-women, anti-gay and nihilistic.

Undoubtedly, they use poverty as a recruiting ground, but most of the poor in these countries abhor terrorism as much as they have contempt for their own governments. They are often unwittingly caught in the cross-fire, too scared to make a stand and raise their voices. Moreover, these groups are controlled by a rich, intellectual elite. Osama Bin-Laden was no slum-dweller.

Whoever wrote this article obviously has not visited the developing world. Rather than listen to the men with guns who always appear in the media, take a trip to Congo or Kashmir and listen to what ordinary people have to say. Most of them just want to live in peace and have their basic needs fulfilled without having to struggle.

Dan


Back to the point

17.10.2002 16:33


Many of the people killed in Bali were budget long term travellers who are the positive type of tourist that spends money which ends up directly or not so directly in the pockets of local ordinary people i.e. small guesthouses, cafes and cheap resturaunts. Unlike the sterile all inclusive hotel chains which were built by foreign investment and subsequently takes profits abroad.

It's illogical and suspicious that firstly, this was not a legitamate target for terrorists (why not embassies, multinational businesses or even 5 star hotels?). Secondly, why use such expensive and difficult to acquire (for non-govermental terrorists) plastic explosives when a simple homemade nail bomb would have just the same deadly impact (remember old compton street?). Thirdly, what about the expertise required in handling the explosive and detenator. Finally I have recently come back from India and the violence is not just located in Kashmir, it's everywhere but I never heard of any of the fundamentalists (on either side and there's many) using C4. Incidently where have we heard of even the most educated affluent terrorists using such sophisticated wepons? Only the military. So was it the Indonesian goverment willingly destroying it's own tourist economy? Not likely.

So who really benifits from this?

Who have we heard in the media in the last few days using this attrocity to push through their extremely unpopular policies?

james


According to Plan

17.10.2002 18:28

The Bali bomb got an instant result for Blair though, support for his crusade against Islam has risen ten whole bloodthirsty points and John Howard repeated the Bush and Blair mantra word for word, Iraq, terror, weapons of mass destruction, war... yada, yada, so the Aussies are on board now too.

woo-hoo


Going on holiday in a Third Word country

17.10.2002 21:46

I was in India in the mid-90s for the first time for a five day conference. I hated every minute although I developed a deep regard for the Indian poor. I was genuinely gob-smacked by the extent and sheer scale of the poverty that I witnessed. I was really shaken to the core by what I saw. I imagine that the scale of poverty in Indonesia will be little different. How can ANYONE go on holiday and enjoy themselves to such a place surrounded by people living in makeshift shacks by the road side covered in black tar to keep the rain out? Brits on holiday are not the prettiest sight in the world, lets face it.

Mutley