Skip to content or view screen version

Unbelievable: kids to be encouraged to spy on parents!

man-machine | 14.10.2002 16:23

this is incredible, political dynamite,Pupils as young as 13 are being encouraged to disclose sensitive information
about their parents to the Government to help discover why they might be failing at school. Details of problems such as drink and drug abuse, depression, eating disorders and frequent domestic rows would be sought by advisers


this is truly disturbing, Tony's Third Reich nearer that we thought.

Read on line at:
 http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/10/14/npupil14.xm
l&sSheet=/news/2002/10/14/ixnewstop.html

Pupils urged to inform on problem parents
By Helen Hague
(Filed: 14/10/2002)

Pupils as young as 13 are being encouraged to disclose sensitive information about their parents to the Government to help discover why they might be failing at school.
Details of problems such as drink and drug abuse, depression, eating disorders and frequent domestic rows would be sought by advisers.
The data, gathered without the consent of parents by the Connexions Service,which supplies careers and personal advisers to schools, could be shared with a number of government departments, the police and health authorities.
The methods used to collect this data, its storage and future use, is worrying child mental health experts, lawyers and privacy campaigners.

Information is gathered by Connexion staff under orders from the Department for Education and Skills to compile profiles on 13- to 19-year-olds and identify problems over academic performance. Documents seen by The Daily Telegraph say issues to explore include "evidence of suicidal thoughts", "issues around food/weight", "evidence of bstance use by parent(s)/carers" and "evidence of living in a criminal environment".

Some of the 3,000 advisers in schools, colleges and one-stop advice shops have a background in youth work. Others are trained to NVQ level four, equivalent to the first year at university. To gain a diploma, they attend the equivalent of 17 days' training. Helen Rimington, a member of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Act Tribunal, said: "There are areas here where trained doctors,
psychiatrists, educational psychologists and counsellors would tread very carefully."

Terri Dowty, from Action for the Rights of Children, said: "The equivalent of about three weeks' training can't possibly equip anyone to provide the level of containment necessary in such situations. It has frightening overtones of totalitarian regimes."

A DES spokesman said all 13- to 19-year olds had access to an adviser. Parental profiles could help advisers to identify the need for intervention from other agencies.

man-machine

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Chronic

14.10.2002 18:18

My children are high academic achievers and know already not to grass up mummy, besides, they think I'm the best mom in the world, put that in your pipe and smoke it!

No worries


Not all bad

14.10.2002 18:40

The cry of civil liberties goes up yet again. Yet the point of this is not to snoop on parents, but to find out why some children fail at school - surely the fact that schools are making an attempt to help children in troubled homes is a good thing? I don't think that you can always say that the parents do know best, some parents are incapable of bringing up children for various reasons - poverty, despair, mental illness, alcoholism, excessive drug use, and possibly utter fecklessness.

Matt


it's more stupid than sinister

14.10.2002 19:03

put aside the Data Protection Act and consider that for Connexions to solicit medical information about individuals from third parties for any purpose however noble is highly dubious.
Moreover, the general mechanisms for dealing with this 'unfocused parents create low-achievers' thing already exist - teachers, doctors and social workers are already quite able to interact (subject to some restrictions) but for various reasons lots of kids are still being failed.

bobby


Traitor! Thought criminal!

14.10.2002 19:24

Mathew dahrling your daddy and I paid for the best education for you, and do you remember how you repaid us. You accused us of never being there when you needed us. But daddy had to spend all those hours away from home to earn the money to send you away to the best private school. And I had my social engagements to attend. No Matty we were not bad parents because we were too busy to show you any affection. We paid the best teachers to do that to you. No we were not feckless, cruel parents, and how dare they blame us for you turning out to be a dim, shallow snob.

Ickle Spy