Nu,bers at anti war rally
undercurrents | 28.09.2002 22:45
Whats in a number?
Stop the war demonstration in London 29 sept 02
"350,000 claim at anti-war rally"
ITV.co.uk
"Around a quarter of a million people"
Channel4.co.uk
"Tens of thousands of protesters"
BBC.co.uk/news
"Organisers said around 400,000 protesters"
sky news
"Police told CNN that it was estimated that 150,000"
CNN.com
"Up to 400,000"
Indymedia.org.uk
Stop the war demonstration in London 29 sept 02
"350,000 claim at anti-war rally"
ITV.co.uk
"Around a quarter of a million people"
Channel4.co.uk
"Tens of thousands of protesters"
BBC.co.uk/news
"Organisers said around 400,000 protesters"
sky news
"Police told CNN that it was estimated that 150,000"
CNN.com
"Up to 400,000"
Indymedia.org.uk
undercurrents
Homepage:
http://www.undercurrents.org
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
AL JEZERAS SAYS
28.09.2002 23:18
hey but i reckon it was more like 600,000 :)
(A)
Felt like more than 500,000
29.09.2002 00:22
Peter Tinto
NUMBER ON MARCH
29.09.2002 01:25
And don't beleive the press hype about the march being hijacked by any particular group. The absolutely overwhelming majority of placards, were of the 'Don't attack Iraq' theme.
JACK
500,000
29.09.2002 07:38
skyfly
where was the count point?
29.09.2002 09:00
Some went to the US embassy. Grosvenor Sq had police on most of it's entrances and the embassy had crowd fencing and concrete blocks to prevent vehicles gettiing too close. but maybe those are there all the time?
nomad
what shameless liars they are
29.09.2002 10:30
pyropir
half a million - the numbers correlate
29.09.2002 12:25
The organizers of that march (which was backed by 3 national newspapers and had a huge media buildup) had a big 'counter' which was going up 49 people per second - obviously not really counting but going up in multiples of 49. But because they had a big electronic counter going up saying '400,000' and because it was organized by conservative types it was reported like that. Police then estimated 300,000 which sounds about right to me.
This weekend at the Stop the War protest I again walked from the end point to the beginning of the march and it was definitely larger than the Countryside Alliance march. I overheard a couple of policemen talking about it and saying the Stop the War march was bigger than the Countryside Alliance march. There were thousands of people milling at the end point, Hyde Park, whilst people were still waiting for up to 3 hours at the beginning point waiting to leave!
I have been at a lot of protests in my time, including Seattle (50 thousand) and Genoa (300 thousand), and this was the biggest protest I have ever been on.
I met people on that march that are totally apolitical, friend's mums, and so on - lots of people who aren't the usual protest suspects. It was incredible.
So I have to say that I think if we had had a big counter over our numbers like the Countryside Alliance did the police would be estimating at the very least 400,000 people were there.
Based on the figures and on what I saw and on comparison with last week, I really would stake it was half a million people.
Lots of people are signing a pledge to take non-violent direct action for example at US military bases in the UK if they start bombing.
There is no doubt that an enormous civil disobedience movement is in the wings and ready to take action if they start a war. This is political suicide for Blair and I think after yesterday he knows it.
I was thinking of all of you in DC yesterday too and wishing you strength and luck. You have a more difficult job than us in the UK, where most people hate Bush. But if we're going to stop this war, what you do in the US is the most important of all.
Peace.
Bushed
half a million
29.09.2002 12:41
The organizers of that march (which was backed by 3 national newspapers and had a huge media buildup) had a big 'counter' which was going up 49 people per second - obviously not really counting but going up in multiples of 49. But because they had a big electronic counter going up saying '400,000' and because it was organized by conservative types it was reported like that. Police then estimated 300,000 which sounds about right to me.
This weekend at the Stop the War protest I again walked from the end point to the beginning of the march and it was definitely larger than the Countryside Alliance march. I overheard a couple of policemen talking about it and saying the Stop the War march was bigger than the Countryside Alliance march. There were people milling at the end point, Hyde Park, whilst people were still waiting for up to 3 hours at the beginning point waiting to leave!
I have been at a lot of protests in my time, including Seattle and Genoa, and this was the biggest protest I have ever been on.
I met people on that march that are totally apolitical, friend's mums, and so on. It was incredible.
So I have to say that I think if we had had a big counter over our numbers like the Countryside Alliance did the police would be estimating at least 400,000 people were there.
Sky news that afternoon (a corporate media outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch) was reporting 450,000!
I know it makes me feel good to think it was half a million, but based on the figures and on what I saw and on comparison with last week, I'd stake it was half a million people.
Lots of people are signing a pledge to take non-violent direct action for example at US military bases in the UK if they start bombing.
There is no doubt that an enormous civil disobedience movement is in the wings and ready to take action if they start a war. This is political suicide for Blair and I think after yesterday he knows it.
I was thinking of all of you in DC yesterday too and wishing you strength and luck. You have a more difficult job than us in the UK, where most people hate Bush. But if we're going to stop this war, what you do in the US is the most important of all.
Peace.
Bushed