War in Iraq - Trident's the problem
T Troughton | 14.09.2002 20:46
Blair may be too afraid to ask the real question on Iraq. What do we lose by refusing to support this war? Our nuclear weapons.
Trident’s publicly perceived as the UK’s nuclear deterrent: the means by which we maintain our position of power on the world stage. Of course, this is a myth: Trident’s not, and never has been, in the UK's control. The missiles are targeted by agreement with the US, and the US has a veto over their use. Unlike France, with its own nuclear weapons, or the rest of nuclear free Europe, Britain has become militarily dependent on the US, and its automatic ally as a result.
Never mind the fact that Trident itself is poorly maintained and increasingly outdated. The arrangement allows Bush to wave the fig leaf of British approval, even when the majority of the country are against military action. The addition of Star Wars communication centres at Menwith Hill and Fylingdales continues the process by which the UK is tied into the American war machine. Of course, we have the choice to extricate ourselves. We'd then face US sanctions for this non-compliance, most of which the British public could weather, such as an increase in hostilities in the current trade war. But whether we're ready to face the erosion of our so-called independent nuclear capacity is the big question, and one which Blair may be too afraid to ask.
Never mind the fact that Trident itself is poorly maintained and increasingly outdated. The arrangement allows Bush to wave the fig leaf of British approval, even when the majority of the country are against military action. The addition of Star Wars communication centres at Menwith Hill and Fylingdales continues the process by which the UK is tied into the American war machine. Of course, we have the choice to extricate ourselves. We'd then face US sanctions for this non-compliance, most of which the British public could weather, such as an increase in hostilities in the current trade war. But whether we're ready to face the erosion of our so-called independent nuclear capacity is the big question, and one which Blair may be too afraid to ask.
T Troughton
e-mail:
tabitha64@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Trident
14.09.2002 23:43
I am puzzled by the use of outdated: can you suggest a more modern weapons system?
who?
US Veto
15.09.2002 00:31
As for "outdated" the system is over 20 years old. Setting aside the question of its maintenance, it is already regarded as obsolete by none other than President Bush and his Under Secretary of State John Bolton (see speech made on 3/8/02) It is due to be replaced by more manageable nuclear bombs; but at the moment is the only nuclear "deterrent" the UK possesses.
T Troughton
US controls Trident
15.09.2002 08:44
As for "outdated"; the system is not only over 20 years old and poorly maintained; it, and other Cold War deterrents, have been declared obsolete by none other than President Bush and Under Secretary of State John Bolton (see speech made on 3/8/02). However, it's the only thing we've got - at the moment.
T Troughton
e-mail:
tabitha64@hotmail.com
TRIDENT PLOUGHSHARES
16.09.2002 09:58
gooseberry