The UK needs more local IMCs
Thomas J | 17.07.2002 15:07
There is only one IMC that reflects the issues of a local community at the monent, (Bristol), albeit a very good one. This country's locals area need a voice, and a local IMC would provide just that.
Compared to the USA, there are very few local IMCs in this country, if fact there is only one (Bristol). Even our capital city and the largest urban area in the British Isles, London, does not yet have an IMC. I can think of many places in this country this need a voice, and an IMC would provide such a voice. One such area is my home town of Plymouth, which has one of the poorest area in the country (the St Peter ward), and has a escalating drugs problem, one of the worst in the country relative to its population. Many of Bristol Indymedia's articles could apply to Plymouth, just substitute Bristol for Plymouth, and Easton for Devonport, Stonehouse, Stoke, Efford or Swilly/North Prospect.
Plymouth is not the only area in this country that I feel would benefit from having its own IMC. Northern towns such as Burnley, Oldham, and Bradford, which are extremely ecomomically disadvantaged, and are also facing the problems of racial tension (not helped by groups such as the BNP, especially in Burnley's case). Also large urban areas such as Glasgow, Manchester, Leeds, and not forgetting London should also have their own IMC.
There are many local IMCs in the USA, in this one instance I believe that the UK should follow their example.
Plymouth is not the only area in this country that I feel would benefit from having its own IMC. Northern towns such as Burnley, Oldham, and Bradford, which are extremely ecomomically disadvantaged, and are also facing the problems of racial tension (not helped by groups such as the BNP, especially in Burnley's case). Also large urban areas such as Glasgow, Manchester, Leeds, and not forgetting London should also have their own IMC.
There are many local IMCs in the USA, in this one instance I believe that the UK should follow their example.
Thomas J
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Yes but
17.07.2002 15:41
There are groups throughout the country who are being encouraged to communicate with each other in order for them to set up and Indymedia, either as it's own IMC site or as a page which would be attached to the current UK site.
When the other IMC's are set up then the process of turning the UK site into a different site or maintaining it as a UK site needs to be discussed with everyone. Does the UK site remain? Or does it disappear?
What about boroughs in London - who will take it on. What about the area of Burnley - who will take it on? - I think there is a need to reduce the geography of the news and have co-ordinated links to each other. Maybe the international Indymedia would be what the UK one may look like, taking local news from local UK IMC's. What do ya think?
act local think global
RE: Yes but
17.07.2002 16:18
Final comment, I agree totally with your idea of regionalisation, since huge national goverments can never be fully in touch with their people, one of my main beliefs is that that should partition England into North and South, since the cultural and economic divide between the two is immense. Then devolution could be taken further, with parliments for individual counties, and even cities.
www.geocities.com/talk2potato
www.geocities.com/keelegr
Thomas J
Collective
17.07.2002 19:33
Collective
e-mail: collective@lists.riseup.net