Skip to content or view screen version

Woomera hunger strikers at the Strand, full article

Maria V. | 09.07.2002 17:13

Since yesterday four hunger strikers have positioned themselves in front of Australia House at the Strand (London). They are staging a protest in support of the refugees locked up in the notorious Australian Woomera Detention Centre, who have been on hunger strike themselves for the past sixteen days.

Since yesterday four hunger strikers have positioned themselves in front of Australia House at the Strand (London). They are staging a protest in support of the refugees locked up in the notorious Australian Woomera Detention Centre, who have been on hunger strike themselves for the past sixteen days. Children, women and men incarcerated in Woomera for sometimes more than 2 years, have refused to eat or drink anything since June 24, because the Australian government threatens to deport Afghan Hazaris. Some of them have sewn their lips together.

The protesters at Aldwych, not your regular activists but more 'concerned citizens', demand that the appalling conditions of asylum seekers in the Australian Woomera Detention Centre end now. Woomera has been likened to a Nazi concentration by human rights organisations and has received severe criticism from UN officials. Constant punishments, institutional violence, breaches of all basic human rights and repeated suicide attempts are the everyday reality of the detainees who are almost all simply waiting for their asylum application to be processed, which is their legal right even in Australia. Together with the Refugee Embassy and other refugee advocate groups in Australia the Aldwych hunger strikers are calling on the governments of the world to impose sanctions on Australia, in the same way that they did with South Africa. The psychological torture imposed on the prisoners in their concentration camps has resulted in an epidemic of mental illness and suicide attempts within those camps. Children as young as nine years old have tried to kill themselves.

The London hunger strike does not stand on its own. Yesterday, people in Newcastle were being issued with black armbands, to be worn in solidarity with the starving hunger strikers at Woomera Detention Centre. In Kyogle, New South Wales, a woman took a vow of silence for twenty-four hours, as a symbol of solidarity with the detainees who have been silenced by the Government's efforts to isolate them through incarceration in the most remote areas possible, denial of visits, phone calls, media access, and through interference with their mail. This Wednesday 5pm Chilout (Children out of Detention) will be holding a solidarity fast outside Australia House as well. The two protests will unite on Wednesday evening in a mass protest against the detention and abuse of refugees in Australia.

The UK protest follow several months of actions concerning Woomera in Australia and coincides with Australia's National Day of Fasting yesterday. Hunger strikes in Mexico, Israel, India and the United States have been reported as well.

The hunger strikers at Aldwych keep their camp in front of the Australian High Commission until Wednesday afternoon in defiance of police threats (allegedly based on 'The Vienna Convention') that they will be removed, since their presence constitutes an 'intrusion into the dignity of the building'. Unwittingly the police officer concerned provided the protesters with their action theme: "What government puts the dignity of a building over the dignity of a person?".

The protesters call for everyone to join their and Chilout's action.

Maria V.

Comments

Hide the following 12 comments

publicity complaints

10.07.2002 07:22

whilst i can understand the fact that these people may want to distance themselves from the public perception of protestors in the past fostered by governments and idiots who tag along to marches for kicks trying to "kick things off" with little regard for the safety of those around them, i've got to complain that the way in which the article related to their protest actually contributes to the marginalisation of other protestors.

it says something along the lines of "these are not everyday activists but concerned normal citizen". Did it not occur to the writer that many activists are concerned citizens, rather than the hooligans, thugs and mindless slaves to violence that they are portrayed as in countless articles in various mainstream news publications in this country. It's pointless to include remarks like that which imply some kind of evil associated with being someone who's been protesting the disgusting conditions that our governments foster and bring to effect around the world rather than someone who's new to it.

There is a strange assumption amongst "middle england" (well amongst middle class people that i know) that people who protest on a regular basis lack something to do on weekends or something. Rather it's more likely that (and in my case is true that) people who get involved with the activism find out more and more about what is happening (through association with people who pay more attention on current affairs) and realise that there is much more that needs to be protested against.

Aside from this gripe my support goes to the hunger strikers. I wish i had the courage to join them in such an action.

NTG


'Concerned citizens'

10.07.2002 09:27

Well... since this writer considers herself both an activist and a concerned citizen, she understands your point very well. What I ment to say was that these four people, who I admire as much as you, are not linked to 'the activist' community as I know it here in London. They are people who are not usually involved in actions like these, but heard about the National Day of Fasting and just spontanuously decided to join. That you think that I mean "hooligans, thugs and mindless slaves to violence" when I say activists, while that word to me means people who have made actions like these a more regular part of their lives, is interesting.

Maria V.


hehe

10.07.2002 15:40

alright then fair point. i just know if my mum (for instance) read that article she'd go "oh they're alright then. they're not mindless protest hopping hippes/thugs/hooligans/idiots." It's good to hear about people getting involved and taking action.

i still don't know how relevant it is that they weren't people who have been active before, other than possibly that the "activist community" (for want of a better name) can be thankful for a handful of new members (who come and go with some frequency usually), but that's your prerogative.

sorry to sidetrack this somewhere it didn't really need to go but at hte time i thought it was an important point to make. best of luck to the hunger strikers and the detainees in Woomera.

NTG


also

10.07.2002 15:47

I didn't think that you meant "thugs and hooligans", but that it might be read by others as an attempt to publicly disconnect them from the "activist community". iv'e only been an activist since march and i consider myself part of the activist community. integration within the activist community is (in my experience so far of it at least) simply a matter of participation and willingness to take part and help. The fact that they weren't activists previously just seems irrelevant unless you're trying to disconnect them from protesting in general, or something to that effect. sorry to labour a point.

NTG


What would you do?

11.07.2002 22:50

Hmmm. Australia has been deemed by federal enviornmental surveys of being able to support and sustain no more than thirty million people at current standard of living levels. Since it is effectively two-thirds *full* for all time, should it not have the right to deem who is acceptable and a genuine refugee and who is not?

I'll take it that most people agree with the fact that most asylum seekers in the UK invariably do not exit the country if their plea for asylum fails. Since the chances of successful asylum seeking at the moment currently stand at around 15%, can you blame Australia for wanting to isolate those that seek to take advantage of their system?

In addition, I might make a small comment on Afghans who currently seek asylum. I cannot blame *anyone* in Afghanistan for seeking asylum in another country. It doesn't seem to be a very nice place to be. But don't you think that it would be more humane - as well as infinitely smarter - to make the country more inhabitable for those people that want a safe and secure life? This might include REAL investment by Western corporations into Afghan infrastructure, as well as definite peacekeeping duties by the US (which fails to see it as important and then wonders why places revert to their previous corrupt, vassal selves when it ridses off into the sunset looking for the next place to earn "glory"). The whole premise of "let's bomb somewhere and not worry about the aftereffects" is totally wrong.

For God's sakes, we need to tackle the problem of immigration at the source. I challenge anyone to make a reasonable argument for what a country *should* be doing on asylum and immigration. What is fair? Should immigration just be open to anyone? Is that a ridiculous idea? If so, then what is the alternative? Because nothing *I've* seen from any world governments or heard from this column has been a viable alternative to current methods used in Australia.

Good luck in convincing me! :)

One Point Zero


Inhumane incarceration

15.07.2002 11:49

A government should never be allowed to do what Australia is doing: locking up people who are in the process of applying for asylum (their legal right), putting their 'care' in the hands of private security forces who are extremely violent and not trained to deal with the often traumatised refugees and portray the asylum seekers as lunatic criminals when they respond to the everyday brutality they are facing by going on hunger strike or killing themselves.

Maria V.


What a load of crap!

17.07.2002 07:30

Australia can environmentally sustain no more than 30 million people?! What a load of utter bollox! Don't know what you've been reading mate, but you're getting your facts wrong bigtime!

Australia is crying out for more people. Have you ever been to somewhere outside the cities in Australia? The small towns are dying out one by one - much to the concern of the residents. I've spoken to some who've said that they are desperate for more people to come and revitalise their community, and that they'd welcome the people currently in detention centres with open arms. They need them to kick-start the economy again.

Yes, we should work on improving the conditions in other countries - you're right in thinking that there wouldn't be the level of immigration there is now if there was equity worldwide. But until this happens, immigration will continue to be from the poor countries to the rich countries, and shutting your borders up is not going to solve anything. Mandatory detention is NOT the answer.

Chick


Woomera Detention Centre

21.07.2002 12:17

I live in Adelaide South Australia, only 500 km from the Woomera Detention Center. The detention centre isn't that bad i have lived in Woomera for about 4 years in the late 1980's. have you heard of the "Woomera Alternative Detention Arrangements for Women and Children" Project???? (www.immi.gov.au fact sheet #83)
It lets women, and children stay in a 3 bedroom house until their visa's have cleared, which sounds to me pretty damn good. Also if Australia isn't supposed to take all of the asylm seekers and put them in a place away from the public what is it supposed to do? Let anyone and everyone stay in australia? What if the asylm seekers are criminals?? Who would protect them then?

The reason that the detainees are in the detention centres soo long is because they destroy any identification them selves before comming to Australia.

I understand if the asylm seekers are comming because of how bad it was in their last country was but dont you think if it was that bad they would keep all identification, and get visa's before it is too late....

Adelaide Chick


P.S.

21.07.2002 12:36

here is a link all about the Woomera Detention Centre
 http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/detention/woomera_irpc.htm

Its not that bad, its a paid for holiday. You guys all make it out like it is jail. Some people in Australia would rather live there than in their own homes. Some Australians are too poor and the government treats the detainees better.

Adelaide Chick


You Have got to be Joking

22.07.2002 04:58

I grew tired of this, so tired, what can i really say Adelaide Chick, you are a Fucking Idiot and the sooner your kind Breeds themselves out, the better it shall be for all Humanity on the quest for Freedom. Stay in your bubble, its obviously the best place for you.

Tiffany


heya Tiffany

24.07.2002 07:39

So Tiffany where you from? Australia??? South Australia? You lived in Woomera? not that bad now is it?

I'm glad you like my bubble, I do too. =)

Adelaide Chick


Where Do U Live?

26.07.2002 04:56

Adelaide Chick, although i dont see why my place of abode does much to squash my opinions on Woomera, i will answer your puny questions anyway. I live in Australia, currently in South Australia, i was involved in the last breakout at Woomera and will be involved in all the breakouts yet to come. Please wake up to yourself, 8 year old girls in decent living conditions or on 'paid for holidays', dont usually decide to drink shampoo and then hang themselves in their rooms. 'Paid for Holidays', this quote from you really is quite disguisting and fucked up on your behalf, All humans deserve an equal share of Freedom and life, especially those fighting everyday to stay alive.
You are a very predictable person, i feel you worrying right now about your mobile phone being low on credit and whether you have time to condition your hair before you go out tonight. Im bored of writing to you now, for you are a fucking mule and i never want to hear from you again, fuck off.

Tiffany