News from Close Down Harmondsworth Campaign
NCADC | 27.06.2002 08:58
In light of the events at Yarl's Wood sprinklers are going to be installed over the summer. There will be substantial building work and Harmondsworth will be emptied by 50% for several months.
Internal security gates are also going to be installed so that detainees won't be free to wander round the centre and engage in free association, one of the few pleasures they have. They will be held on designated wings and will have to be escorted to education, recreation and healthcare. It has been stated that more staff will be employed to cope with this and a tannoy may be installed. However,
considering the current lack of staff, which results in very long waiting times for visitors, one visitor recently waited four hours, it is doubtful if anything will improve.
The regime will change too, for the worse. At the moment there are "standard" and "enhanced" regimes. The difference between these will be broadened with a possible curtailment of visiting hours for those on "standard" regime. A demotion to "standard" regime will be used as a punishment. Of the new wings, one will be for people with removal
directions and one will be for 'long-termers'. So much for the government's assertion that people are only held pending removal.
The Home Office Contract Monitor plans a meeting with the groups which visit Harmondsworth to explain the changes when they are finally decided and to ask for opinions, but wouldn't say whether these changes are because of demands from the centre's insurers, or when the insurance is up for renewal.
He has also stated that, post-Yarl's Wood, there is a policy of separating large groups of people of the same nationality, or groups who are 'disruptive'. He said that centres don't make this decision, this resides with the Home Office, although they can make representations to him about who they would like to be moved and he can pass them on, Immigration outside the centre decide.
The Contract Monitor also commented on the reporting of people whose health would be injuriously affected by continued detention, just about all of them I would have thought. He said healthcare staff were aware of their responsibility in this area, although that is very much open to doubt, but the definition appears ungenerous as this procedure has only been used once to release someone. Also it is still not clear when a resident psychiatrist will be employed, so who is going to make the assessments. He said people are welcome to get their own medicals done, but didn't explain how this could be achieved. There
are constant complaints about a perceived lack of proper medical care.
In addition it was said that women more than 7 months pregnant would not be detained because commercial airlines will not carry them. Presumably if they can persuade the airlines to carry them these women will also be locked up. There has been a report of a pregnant woman with an eleven month old child being held. In cases where aircraft are chartered and there are medical personnel on board (usually in the case of Eastern European countries)women over 7 months pregnant may be detained.
It has also been reported that Immigration Officers in the centre have the responsibility to complete NASS forms for accommodation for people with imminent bail hearings. The Contract Monitor said they are aware of their responsibility and have the forms in the centre, but considering their lack of sympathy with detainees one wonders how diligent they will be.
Work has started on a new centre adjacent to the existing one. The contract has not yet been awarded but it is planned to be based on a prison design with galleried units and will hold about 400. It is intended that the most 'disruptive' people in the detention estate will be held there. It's going to be called IDC Longford.
We must step up the campaign to close these centres and end this abuse of human rights!
Ray Barkley
Close Down Harmondsworth Campaign
Internal security gates are also going to be installed so that detainees won't be free to wander round the centre and engage in free association, one of the few pleasures they have. They will be held on designated wings and will have to be escorted to education, recreation and healthcare. It has been stated that more staff will be employed to cope with this and a tannoy may be installed. However,
considering the current lack of staff, which results in very long waiting times for visitors, one visitor recently waited four hours, it is doubtful if anything will improve.
The regime will change too, for the worse. At the moment there are "standard" and "enhanced" regimes. The difference between these will be broadened with a possible curtailment of visiting hours for those on "standard" regime. A demotion to "standard" regime will be used as a punishment. Of the new wings, one will be for people with removal
directions and one will be for 'long-termers'. So much for the government's assertion that people are only held pending removal.
The Home Office Contract Monitor plans a meeting with the groups which visit Harmondsworth to explain the changes when they are finally decided and to ask for opinions, but wouldn't say whether these changes are because of demands from the centre's insurers, or when the insurance is up for renewal.
He has also stated that, post-Yarl's Wood, there is a policy of separating large groups of people of the same nationality, or groups who are 'disruptive'. He said that centres don't make this decision, this resides with the Home Office, although they can make representations to him about who they would like to be moved and he can pass them on, Immigration outside the centre decide.
The Contract Monitor also commented on the reporting of people whose health would be injuriously affected by continued detention, just about all of them I would have thought. He said healthcare staff were aware of their responsibility in this area, although that is very much open to doubt, but the definition appears ungenerous as this procedure has only been used once to release someone. Also it is still not clear when a resident psychiatrist will be employed, so who is going to make the assessments. He said people are welcome to get their own medicals done, but didn't explain how this could be achieved. There
are constant complaints about a perceived lack of proper medical care.
In addition it was said that women more than 7 months pregnant would not be detained because commercial airlines will not carry them. Presumably if they can persuade the airlines to carry them these women will also be locked up. There has been a report of a pregnant woman with an eleven month old child being held. In cases where aircraft are chartered and there are medical personnel on board (usually in the case of Eastern European countries)women over 7 months pregnant may be detained.
It has also been reported that Immigration Officers in the centre have the responsibility to complete NASS forms for accommodation for people with imminent bail hearings. The Contract Monitor said they are aware of their responsibility and have the forms in the centre, but considering their lack of sympathy with detainees one wonders how diligent they will be.
Work has started on a new centre adjacent to the existing one. The contract has not yet been awarded but it is planned to be based on a prison design with galleried units and will hold about 400. It is intended that the most 'disruptive' people in the detention estate will be held there. It's going to be called IDC Longford.
We must step up the campaign to close these centres and end this abuse of human rights!
Ray Barkley
Close Down Harmondsworth Campaign
NCADC
e-mail:
ncadc@ncadc.org.uk
Homepage:
http://www.ncadc.org.uk/
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
not before time
27.06.2002 14:26
taxpayer
dear taxpayer
28.06.2002 16:47
Why should I have to pay extra tax to fund all these detention camps and deportations? Why can't we let folk come and work, so they pay tax rather than costing it?
Face it; not only is the current policy brutal and racist, but it also costs a fortune. Everyone loses!
(unless, I suppose, you find suffering entertaining)
also a taxpayer
Keep Harmondsworth!
30.06.2002 14:05
People with violent tendencies towards women, people with criminal convictions who've left there own country to escape prosecution (not persecution), rapists, sometimes even murderers, drug smugglers etc.
Ok, so many of them may not have imminent removal directions but releasing them would be harmful to society.
And you think Harmondsworth should be closed!?
In the know.....
cage everybody!
30.06.2002 20:00
So, the only logical safety measure, I believe, is to lock everyone up. Starting with the foreigners and the weird ones. Preventative measures. It's so simple. Either that or kill everybody in a nuclear armageddon type scenario.
But what kind of politician is going to consider nuclear war or even locking people up in case they do something bad?
Clampdown Kim
Arms Trade
01.07.2002 14:23
steelgate
Good point
02.07.2002 22:41
Thomas J
too right
05.07.2002 15:12
Some people wonder why Britain is such a huge target, since we are a densely populated island in comparision to much larger countries in the EU, such as France and Germany. The problem is that many EU countries have even harsher asylum laws than our own (the 'Fortress Europe' mentality), and the UK is seen as a 'soft touch' (I'm not saying that's a bad thing). It's high time that the rest of the EU woke up to the fact that THEY have a responsibilty, as developed countries, to accept their role in helping out these people (Britain should still do it's bit as well), especially since their exploitation of the 'developing' countries for their own capitailist ends is a root cause of the asylum problem in the first place.
Thomas J