Discrimination: posts intending to oppress - using language, imagery, or other forms of communication which promote racism, fascism, xenophobia, sexism, or any other form of discrimination. Advertising: posts which are personally or product promotional in nature. Infactual: posts which are obviously infactual or misleading. Repeated posting: if contribution is reposted or text that was originally a comment was posted as a report
any posts you refer to that were hidden more than likly fall into the infactual catogory
"Stop the US Navy shelling the north of Scotland"THIS STORY WAS DELETED AND AND DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE HIDDEN LIST YOU ARE COVERING UP THE NEWS %&$&%^*%(^&@#!@#*&()*!!!! ALLYOU SEE IS "NO STORY TO TELL"
Yes, I agree - using that link to the bargain basement I see that this story is nestling there as is my latest contribution. While also on the main line. How interesting! Well, I'd always thought that an organisation like indymedia would receive an infiltrator or two. Maybe that man's in charge tonight. Wheeee! down we go
The FBI, CIA, MI5 and Special Branch amongst others can easily read and if they see fit censor anything available to them, whether they are technically allowed to legally or not. Certainly it is fully legal for the FBI to do so. For a Marxist analysis of this, and with programatic value, you will be interested in:
hey if your so worried why dont you go and help out there are very few who donate there time to indymedia and lots who critize. indymedia uk is run by people who give a fuck not like you wankers its fuckin easy to moan and do nothing but thats the english way isnt it oh and they are broke too
i should point out here that 98% of www.infowars.com articles are actually just links to the mainstream press.
This is something obviously too hard for some of you guys to take. Its sad to think that while other indymedia sites, and even mainstream news sources (newsnight, channel 4, the guardian etc) seem to realise that there is something extremely fishy about the whole sept. 11th thing, there are still people so desparate to believe the official version of events that they are prepared to blank out any contradictory evidence regardless of how true or untrue it may be.
Are we to believe that one of those 'don't rock my reality' fools is on the editorial team at uk indymedia? That would be a VERY sad state of affairs and of course would also completely contradict the idea of independant media. I suggest that this is looked at *VERY* hard by the hard-working folks at indymedia, or else there is a serious risk that all that hard work will become yet more pro-government propaganda. And let me tell you, the BBC does that better than you guys could ever hope to.
contury to popular beleif imc-uk is not censoring articles the "NO STORY TO TELL" is a problem with the server and somone is trying to fix it but there are 70 + indy sites on one server so it gets blocked up
just to put all you people who jump on there conspiricy theory bandwagon or worse still the its all fucked up and we'er going to rub it in bandwagon out of their misery
like i said b4 why dont you help out instead of moan
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
editorial guidelines
24.06.2002 17:11
)
have been hiddencause the fall into the editorial guidelines(top of front page) see below
Discrimination: posts intending to oppress - using language, imagery, or other forms of communication which promote racism, fascism, xenophobia, sexism, or any other form of discrimination.
Advertising: posts which are personally or product promotional in nature.
Infactual: posts which are obviously infactual or misleading.
Repeated posting: if contribution is reposted or text that was originally a comment was posted as a report
any posts you refer to that were hidden more than likly fall into the infactual catogory
imc-uk
WHAT ABOUT THISSTORY
24.06.2002 17:30
ALLYOU SEE IS "NO STORY TO TELL"
U-LIE
I agree
24.06.2002 21:33
Well, I'd always thought that an organisation like indymedia would receive an infiltrator or two. Maybe that man's in charge tonight. Wheeee! down we go
dh
FBI section was not available
24.06.2002 21:58
uh Yeah
COINTELPRO; FBI...
24.06.2002 22:45
Antid Oto
re: I agree
24.06.2002 23:38
alex jones
conspiricy theory
25.06.2002 01:09
oh and they are broke too
zcat
erm...
25.06.2002 14:03
This is something obviously too hard for some of you guys to take. Its sad to think that while other indymedia sites, and even mainstream news sources (newsnight, channel 4, the guardian etc) seem to realise that there is something extremely fishy about the whole sept. 11th thing, there are still people so desparate to believe the official version of events that they are prepared to blank out any contradictory evidence regardless of how true or untrue it may be.
Are we to believe that one of those 'don't rock my reality' fools is on the editorial team at uk indymedia? That would be a VERY sad state of affairs and of course would also completely contradict the idea of independant media. I suggest that this is looked at *VERY* hard by the hard-working folks at indymedia, or else there is a serious risk that all that hard work will become yet more pro-government propaganda. And let me tell you, the BBC does that better than you guys could ever hope to.
townie
INDY-MEDIA UK IS not DELETING ANTI-U.S. ARTCL
25.06.2002 17:55
the "NO STORY TO TELL" is a problem with the server and somone is trying to fix it but there are 70 + indy sites on one server so it gets blocked up
just to put all you people who jump on there conspiricy theory bandwagon
or worse still the its all fucked up and we'er going to rub it in bandwagon
out of their misery
like i said b4 why dont you help out instead of moan
ZCAT