Skip to content or view screen version

Stop the Lancaster University greenfield expansion

Steve Booth | 17.06.2002 00:08

Creeping tide of naff urbaization threatens to engulf green fields while university growth is achieved on the back of increasing student debt.

OPPOSE THE LANCASTER UNIVERSITY EXPANSION
Jarvis Destruction plc, in conjunction with Lancaster University want to build a new complex on a greenfield site to the south of the university. Part of this will involve a new link road between Green Lane and the A6. The scheme is being rushed ahead to try to forestall local objections and to capitalise on funding before the state's education budget is eaten up with the long anticipated upcoming war on Iraq. Student representatives oppose the scheme, which is expected to drive up the rents to £68 / wk. Ultimately this destruction will be paid for with increased student debt. Trish McGrath, President of the Student Union, said the student voice had not been listened to in the uni council meetings. This cash cow, costing £120M, will be owned by Jarvis, under a 35 year lease scheme, and will provide 1750 new residencies. Other developments not shown on the plan include an 'Infolab' complex nearby. On top of all this, under 'Phase 1' there are also plans to pull down existing university buildings and put up a seven storey monster accommodation block. Eventually, 4,000 university residences are expected to be owned and managed by Jarvis.

ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION
Buildings on the existing Barker House site are not in keeping with the surrounding countryside, with naff three storey pink buildings on top of the hill, overpowering Ellel and the village of Galgate. Expect more of the same but worse with this new scheme. Many of the residents of Galgate expressed their opposition, to local MP Hilton Dawson, and University Council, pro-Vice Chancellor Alan Whitaker, at a meeting in the Stoney Lane Institute, Galgate on Saturday 15th June 2002. Organised by local residents Helena Todd and Val Purnell, people told of their concerns about the wholly negative impact such a gross development will have on the quality of our environment here.

ROADS AND TRAFFIC
During the protest meeting it became clear that the impact of their link road on traffic has not been properly considered. Abattoir waste Nightingale Farm lorries already use Green Lane to avoid Lancaster centre, and will cut through. The proposal to increase the size of the university by 18% will bring much more traffic. Already, in rush hours, traffic backs up from Galgate traffic lights, almost to the point where this road will be built. There have been many crashes on this part of the A6 in recent years. It is a common experience to see roadside bouquets of flowers left where people have died. Often there is a 'serious accident here - can you help?' notice outside the main university gates. With another road junction put in on this fast stretch of road, near the bend, the university should order another one of these signs now.

PROMISES BROKEN
It is not just about the destruction of green fields, unacceptable though this is. It is also about drainage. The existing buildings have diverted old water courses, causing rain to flood down Chapel Lane, and overwhelm the septic tanks of the houses and farms there. 'Would you like raw sewage to wash across your garden?' asked one irate resident. During the Galgate protest meeting, slides were shown of the flood waters. Before the building of the graduate college, promises were made to build surge chambers to collect flood waters, but this was just bullshit. Screening trees were also not planted. People said that previous promises made were not kept, so why should residents trust them now?

FLOODING
Objectors described how run off from the university also flows into Ou-Beck, which since the mid 1990s expansion has repeatedly flooded houses in Meadow Park, Galgate. The recent building excavations have covered over a spring, which has made water flow down Chapel Lane towards the village.

RIBBON DEVELOPMENT
We have to understand the context. The proposed Whinney Carr housing estates and the existing Royal Albert housing site, together with the proposed science park near the old water works, will join the south of Lancaster to the university. This Barker House development will join the university to Ellel, At the meeting, we were told that Lancaster City Council (aka "The Forces of Mordor") is in favour and wants to bulldozer through the scheme asap. This comes as no surprise. We know how many recent development schemes there have been here. We all remember how two or three years ago, the Council's Lune Trail had cut down trees, inverted and placed them in large plant pots as a perverted satanic parody of nature. More developments, housing estates, university expansions eating up the beautiful countryside here are clearly part of their obscene plan. However, the scheme is to be discussed at a council meeting on 22nd July. The University Council is said to be meeting on the 19th. People who are concerned about this threat to the environment are urged to write letters to councillors and council planning officers, and make representations. Further residents' meetings are planned. We were left with the distinct impression that time is running out.

Steve Booth
- e-mail: grandlaf@lineone.net

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

Dumbing down, building up!

17.06.2002 06:41

With the dumbing down of higher education in general, almost anyone can now go to university (if they or their parents, can afford it of course). It seems that it is the intent to run higher education along the lines of business.

Obviously for such a business to be successful then such unbridled "development" as outlined by Steve, must be allowed (and encouraged even) to go ahead.

It seems to me if ever more people are to "benefit" from higher education, that reasons for the type of thing happening at Lancaster, are quite clear.


Druid

Druid
mail e-mail: novelty22@hotmail.com


Javis

17.06.2002 09:03

One thing that is clear is that Javis are not the best contractors in the world- my experiences of them at York uni (UK) is that they can't get things right, this is a quote from the student newspaper:

"The problems continue in the Jarvis UPP accommodation in Wentworth as compensation is agreed... based on the multitude of problems that residents have suffered since they arrived on October 5 2001 to January 18... Students who suffered from the loss of heating and hot water will receive £15 for each week they have been affected. A loss of heating only, £10; the lack of a cooker, £10; defects with shower pods, £15; absence of stowaway bed and additional wardrobe in large bedrooms; £10... Students arrived at the new 52-week accommodation to find many parts of their flats either incomplete or lacking basic facilities and 30 were forced to spend Freshers’ Week in B&Bs, which led to them receiving £120 compensation." (York Vision-133- www.yorkvision.co.uk)

In another article in the same issue the SU president points out that differentiated rents will create student ghettos: "Rent rises through the back door do not tally with the rhetorical argument that choice is increased." The same will happen at Lancaster- with the uni and Jarvis pushing this through quickly, to stifle criticism. The rent, for an ensuite room is already £68 per week.

For people who don't know where the site is, take a look at this (from www.multimap.co.uk)

 http://www.multimap.com/map/photo.cgi?client=europe&x=348500&y=456750&scale=10000&width=700&height=410

(Hope the link works) The square building that is in the centre of the photo is graduate college, there will be another, similar building benith it, and more buildings to the left (some for families)- the farm you can see (just below grad. college) will be converted into 'recreational facilities'. On the rest of campus there will be other developments- with older accommodation being replaced (as far as I am aware with mainly ensuite rooms). It seems clear that the uni wants rich kids

tom
- Homepage: http://www.multimap.com/map/photo.cgi?client=europe&x=348500&y=456750&scale=10000&width=700&height=410


parknook

17.06.2002 13:27

Parknook.da.ru.com a liverpool site occupied by environmental activist opposed to the development at the expense of local feelings,wishes or desires . Usual bunch of greedy capitalists developers want to build some luxury flats and a nice drive way for the new yupsuperiormark 2 urbanite scum flashing dosh and carving up the area.The woodland was earmarked for development despitea 3 year battle to stop the project, recently however they broke several laws and just cut several trees down thus started the resistance anew. good to see some fighting over in Lancaster why don't they use the castle for digs and let the prisoners free .

exorcist
mail e-mail: exorcistATpostmaster.co.uk


Jarvis rings a bell

17.06.2002 16:00

Weren't they the firm charged with maintaining the track at the site of the rail crash last month?

Miker


Keele is also destoying the area round it

17.06.2002 16:38

Note: This is a different person to the "Tom" who posted earlier.

You may be interested to know that the powers that be in my university, Keele, have recently managed to remove a preservation on an old horse chesnut tree on the edge of campus. The reasons why they want to chop it down are as yet unknown to me, but I understand that are planning to build the final two of the four "Innovation Centres" in the same region. These buildings serve no academic purpose, they are there to help new businesses grow and to provide extra profit to the Univeristy. Me and my friends at Keele Globalise Resistance (we are dropping the GR name next year because our views differ somewhat to the national orginastion), oppose this, and we have sent e-mails to the Vice Chancellor, Janet Finch, although she never replyed to me. The latest news is that the tree is safe for the moment, but there are many areas around the Keele campus that are still under threat. This is not the only thing that Keele University is doing to cause concern to its students however, but if you want to know more those, follow these links:

"Potato" - an indepedent media service we stated in January, I conderder it like an unofficial Keele IMC:

www.geocities.com/talk2potato


Keele Globalise Resistance - This site hasn't been updated for a while, but it still provides infomation on what we do, and the issues that are affecting Keele students:

www.geocities.com/keelegr

Thomas J


Whoops

17.06.2002 17:32

Just had a reply from someone on behalf of Janet Finch, the mature horse chestnut tree is safe, but there are two other trees that are rotten and need to be removed. Seems everyone has got their wires crossed. Still, I still think that the new buildings are damaging the greenfields around Keele campus, and the sites I mentioned on my previous posting will inform you of the other dirty tricks that Keele University is up to.

OK, I apologise for misinforming everyone, and I realise this article is on the situation surronding Lancaster University, not Keele, so I'll leave it now for people to make comments on the situation in Lancaster.

Thomas J


Keele: our home

28.06.2002 13:35

For a website devoted to resisting campus corporatisation@keele.

Beware of pop-ups...

stinkbomb
- Homepage: http://tbns.net/korv/splash1.html


A little less conversation...

07.07.2002 22:56

Here in Oxford one Brookes hall of residence is being built and will be run by Jarvis. People are going to be watching closely to see what a difference this makes. Hopefully less as most halls will still be university owned for the moment.

But there are alternatives. For all the negative talk about Keele on here, they did at least find a way of financing their development without selling out to PFI.

In Oxford, I took a motion to a recent SU General Meeting calling on them to support the establishment of a Students Housing Co-operative and sure, it got unanimous support in the meeting, but not a single person has expressed an interest in getting involved since. I'm not a student but a member of staff who is concerned about housing costs and trying to facilitate students doing something about it for themselves - but I shalln't be doing it for ever without some potential student co-operators coming out of the woodwork to join me.

I Canada there are student housing co-ops with 900 rooms and such like. It is not inconceivable that co-ops could do deals the size of the Jarvis type deals to take over the management and future development of student housing. But only if there is activist appetite for it.

So far, I have seen very little. Sad.

ockox3