well, 'Jamil', that was a pretty pathetic effort. Considering how you have to dress it up as if you were one of the bad, bad 'terrorists' in order to trick anyone into reading your lame-brained Zionist propaganda.

Apparently, this behaviour results from your own desperation after you noticed that no-one even bothers to read or respond to this crap if you don't use your various uncunning cloaking techniques - you should maybe ask yourself why that is, instead of wasting your own and others time with this purile baiting-game. Also, ask yourself why no Palestinian struggling for freedom from Invaders, something he actually *does* have a legal right to do, feels the need to dirty himself by pretending to be a Zionist.

Seeing as 'Jamil' is patently misappropriated, I am going to lend you a new name, one which will help people locate your ideas a little better:
It's Arik Scheinerman Jr.

Now, Arik Jr., here is a quote from your own site:

"The right to self defense.

In Israel, every day is September 11. Just as the U.S. has attacked the foundation of the terror that struck it regardless of millions of Afghan refugees and civilians, so does Israel have the right to destroy the foundation of the Palestinian terror. The government of a state has a higher obligation to protect its own people, regardless of the effect on its enemy's population (see Afghanistan and Iraq). If they suffer from it, then they should replace the leaders who brought it on them (same logic as the U.S. and Iraq)."

This, as we all now know, is a word-perfect rendition of the Revised Sharon Version of International Law - in other words, a complete travesty of the very basis of all law!!

By this twisted logic, Iraq has the 'right to self defense' to bomb nuclear reactors inside Israel in retaliation for that country's absolutely unprovoked attack on the Iraqi reactor at Osiraq in 1981. Or optionally, to delay its 'response' and use Scuds against Jerusalem in 1991. Is that what you are saying, young Arik?

Or again, that Nicaragua had the 'right to self-defense' to pour Napalm over New-York and Washington for as long as it might take for the US-government to respect the 1986 sentence of the World Court in the Hague, condemning it for terrorist aggression against that country. Is that 'right' right, Arik Jr.?

But then, as I'm sure other readers here already know, people like yourself are convinced that International Law only applies to third countries, never Israel or the United States.

You are a sad example of the blindness and bigotry induced by absorbing saturation-wave propaganda over many years.

For you, the word 'Justice' means only 'We-will-Win!'

This reminds me of a saying and whole mentality that was cultivated to become quite popular in Germany under the enlightened guidance of a certain Mr. Adorf Hilter.

Heil Bush!
Heil Blair!
Heil Sharon!

Shalom, little Arik, hope you're not to 'busy' to respond.