Australia. Just One Of Their Finest Scum.

Yes, I am a perjurer: detective comes clean.

By Neil Mercer
June 1 2002

A long-serving detective yesterday admitted giving perjured evidence in various criminal proceedings for at least 14 years.

The officer, who late last year insisted he had never been involved in any wrongdoing, told the Police Integrity Commission that for much of his 22 years in the service he was a thief, a liar, a perjurer, a perverter of the course of justice - and a criminal.

Perhaps most damaging is his evidence that he has been lying to courts since the 1980s.

The admissions of the man now codenamed F7 have serious implications for the justice system, the PIC and for the Police Service, which has already been battered and bruised by the revelations of corruption over the past seven years, first by the Wood Royal Commission and more recently by the PIC's Operation Florida.

For a start, the authorities will have to determine the court cases in which F7 says he perjured himself and see whether there has been a miscarriage of justice.

In addition, his admissions are likely to open up other lines of inquiry and extend Operation Florida, which started eight months ago and has further damaged the reputation of the state's detectives.

It is not known in which cases F7 lied, but one lawyer said the commission would be debriefing the officer, who has been on sick leave since December 1999 and is seeking a medical discharge.

Until this week he had admitted publicly to taking drug money and fabricating evidence in one operation called Let's Dance in February 1992.

Now he has agreed that during his career as a detective he became "adept at deceit".

F7, who has worked with the Major Crime Squad North, the South-West Major Crime Squad based at Flemington and at Burwood, said some people he had arrested were still in jail.

He told the PIC he joined the north crime squad in 1988 in Newcastle before moving to Chatswood in 1991. Under cross-examination, he agreed he had been giving false evidence in criminal matters before 1988.

On Monday, in a hearing that has been virtually unreported, he was questioned about his admissions by Robert Greenhill, who represents four police involved in Let's Dance.

Mr Greenhill: You agree, don't you, that you became a criminal?

F7: Yes.

You in fact became a perverter of justice? - Yes.

A thief? - Yes.

Have tampered with evidence? - Yes.

A false pretender? - Yes.

And a person who was prepared to commit perjury? - Yes.

F7, who agreed he was "a practised and an accomplished liar", insisted he was finally telling the truth.

He had talked with the PIC and the NSW Crime Commission about an indemnity for some matters but believed he would still go to jail and be dealt with harshly.

"I wouldn't like to go to jail. I believe I will, but I'm not looking forward to it."

Asked whether he would do anything dishonest to avoid imprisonment, F7 replied: "I have tried that avenue in the past, and I don't see it is working, so I have decided to tell the truth."

By Neil Mercer
June 1 2002

A long-serving detective yesterday admitted giving perjured evidence in various criminal proceedings for at least 14 years.

The officer, who late last year insisted he had never been involved in any wrongdoing, told the Police Integrity Commission that for much of his 22 years in the service he was a thief, a liar, a perjurer, a perverter of the course of justice - and a criminal.

Perhaps most damaging is his evidence that he has been lying to courts since the 1980s.

The admissions of the man now codenamed F7 have serious implications for the justice system, the PIC and for the Police Service, which has already been battered and bruised by the revelations of corruption over the past seven years, first by the Wood Royal Commission and more recently by the PIC's Operation Florida.

For a start, the authorities will have to determine the court cases in which F7 says he perjured himself and see whether there has been a miscarriage of justice.

In addition, his admissions are likely to open up other lines of inquiry and extend Operation Florida, which started eight months ago and has further damaged the reputation of the state's detectives.

It is not known in which cases F7 lied, but one lawyer said the commission would be debriefing the officer, who has been on sick leave since December 1999 and is seeking a medical discharge.

Until this week he had admitted publicly to taking drug money and fabricating evidence in one operation called Let's Dance in February 1992.

Now he has agreed that during his career as a detective he became "adept at deceit".

F7, who has worked with the Major Crime Squad North, the South-West Major Crime Squad based at Flemington and at Burwood, said some people he had arrested were still in jail.

He told the PIC he joined the north crime squad in 1988 in Newcastle before moving to Chatswood in 1991. Under cross-examination, he agreed he had been giving false evidence in criminal matters before 1988.

On Monday, in a hearing that has been virtually unreported, he was questioned about his admissions by Robert Greenhill, who represents four police involved in Let's Dance.

Mr Greenhill: You agree, don't you, that you became a criminal?

F7: Yes.

You in fact became a perverter of justice? - Yes.

A thief? - Yes.

Have tampered with evidence? - Yes.

A false pretender? - Yes.

And a person who was prepared to commit perjury? - Yes.

F7, who agreed he was "a practised and an accomplished liar", insisted he was finally telling the truth.

He had talked with the PIC and the NSW Crime Commission about an indemnity for some matters but believed he would still go to jail and be dealt with harshly.

"I wouldn't like to go to jail. I believe I will, but I'm not looking forward to it."

Asked whether he would do anything dishonest to avoid imprisonment, F7 replied: "I have tried that avenue in the past, and I don't see it is working, so I have decided to tell the truth."

By Alex Mitchell, Sun Herald State Political Editor
June 2 2002
The Sun-Herald

Ronnie Smith, one of the State's top homicide investigators, has an appointment with the Police Integrity Commission (PIC) this week when hearings will focus on allegations that police dumped a cache of weapons into the Hawkesbury River.

Chief Superintendent Smith, who has been on stress leave, was not involved in the weapons-dumping caper, but fellow detectives borrowed his boat to carry it out under cover of darkness.

Evidence will be given by a police "rollover" that about 100 weapons, including sawn-off shotguns, rifles and pistols, were dumped over the side into a lonely and deep stretch of the river. The officers decided to "deep-six" the cache of guns in 1995 after feeling heat from the Wood royal commission about verballing criminals and planting weapons on them.

One of the guns that went into the river was a magnum of which the chequered history in the hands of police and criminals will be pursued by PIC assistant commissioner Tim Sage, who is in charge of the Operation Florida inquiry.

"The hearings will examine the collection, retention and use of weapons and other items in acts of corruption by members of the NSW Police Service," according to a PIC statement.

The weapons inquiry, the fourth segment of Operation Florida which began last October, was scheduled for earlier this year but it was postponed when a senior detective rolled over and helped the PIC.

Mr Smith, a commander of Crime Agencies, the State's elite detectives, has already been mentioned in evidence given by a detective now carrying the codename F7. He will be asked whether he received a share of money seized by police in drug busts as claimed by F7 at the PIC on May 8.

F7, then based at Chatswood, was asked about a "divvy-up" of $40,000 in cash that took place in 1991 in the back of a van parked under Roseville Bridge.

Counsel assisting the PIC, Mark Bus-combe, asked: "Are you able to say how much you were given to give to the surveillance unit?"

F7: "No, I can't recall."

Buscombe: "What about to Mr Smith? Are you able to say how much you were given to give to Mr Smith?"

F7: "$2,000."

Mr Smith, one of the best-known detectives in the country, headed Strike Force Fenwick, which was set up by former police commissioner Peter Ryan to investigate the disappearance of three young women from Newcastle over the past 20 years.

Super Rat joins ranks of star informers.

June 12 2002

The police informer was trusted by his mates because they knew he was corrupt, Philip Cornford writes.

Flanked by a police bodyguard, Super Rat came out of hiding yesterday and immediately confirmed his status as the NSW Police Service's busiest informer by incriminating himself in a load-up.

With a list of hits surpassing that of his notorious predecessor Detective Sergeant Trevor Haken, the deep throat of the police royal commission, the undercover agent M5 expressed remorse about planting a gun on a 19-year-old he believed to be innocent.

"I wasn't happy to do it but I had to," M5 testified on his debut - and perhaps only - appearance at the Police Integrity Commission, where he has starred on listening device tapes as a carouser inciting confessions from other dishonest detectives.

He showed a lot more sympathy for M11, one of a gang known as "Wogs out of work" whom he incriminated by burying a gun and then digging it up, than for the mates he betrayed. Confessing his criminality, M5 became the 20th detective to be incriminated by the hours of tapes which he secretly recorded after he became a police informer late in 1998 to save his own skin.

His reward is an indemnity against prosecution, but it means that M5 will have to spend his life under police protection and with a new identity.

So far, his efforts have jailed one colleague and led to criminal charges against another four. But many more charges are certain since three other dishonest cops exposed by M5 have "rolled over" and started testifying against their mates.

One of the "roll-overs" is K8, a high-ranking Crimes Agencies detective. Also accused by M5's tapes and evidence is Chief Superintendent Ron Smith, one of the state's most senior detectives, who will testify today.

M5 was a fluent witness yesterday as he laid more bricks in what counsel assisting the PIC, Chris Hoy, described as "the wall of falsity".

But his testimony added very little that was new, mostly confirming evidence by N2 and F7, his former mates in the hold-up squad of Major Crime Squad North, and contradicting evidence by Inspector Kim Dowding, another former mate.

N2 and F7 were two of the stars of Operation Let's Dance, in which they and other detectives, including K8, split up $80,000 they stole from a drug dealer and boasted about it to M5.

M5's most interesting evidence concerned himself. A confessed alcoholic, he had a breakdown in his first year undercover and was admitted to the psychiatric ward at Manly District Hospital from December 1998 to February 1999.

On discharge from hospital, he began light duties at Manly but his short shifts - half-days at first and then three full days a week - did not hinder his undercover work.

M5 was effective because the dishonest detectives knew he was a crook, too, one of "The Giggle" whom they trusted.

He joined them in stealing from drug dealers, three of them sharing $30,000 in one hit. He took them to lunch and pubs and encouraged them to "get on the squirt" and talk.

Still on psychiatric medication, M5 was supposed to stay on light beer but graduated to the heavy stuff, wine and - when he was with constant companions N2 and F7 - bourbon and coke. It's a tough life, being an informer.

OPEN EMAIL TO, Brian Scott Palliser, and Partners at  hill-lee@chch.planet.org.nz

Brian Scott Palliser, BA. LL.B., AFNZIM, ACIT (Notary Public) is an alleged, practised and an accomplished liar.

 http://www.whitepages.co.nz/quick/search?key=Brian+Palliser.&lkey= Christchurch.&loc=ALL&x=24&y=20

 http://www.yellowpages.co.nz/quick/search?key=Hill-Lee%26Scott&lkey=Christchurch&stype=&search.x=23&search.y=25

Background: On the 13.9.1999, at about 4 pm AUS time a New Zealander Mr. Graham/Graeme Underwood receives a phone call at the Emus Motel, from Brian of 'Horton & Bidwill' Christchurch Lawyers. Underwood since claims 'I am from Christchurch, and have never heard of Horton & Bidwill being lawyers in Christchurch’. An x Tip Top Ice Cream driver claims that Horton & Bidwill were general carries in Christchurch during the fifties and sixties.

The Horton & Bidwill usage, was a word association try on which failed, although extremely, exceptionally cunning. Throw in a name hoping to jog a person’s memory.

Brian your enquiry 'was Julie about regarding a fax she had sent you'. A phone account will be sufficient proof that Brian, and Brian Palliser is one in the same person. Not anticipated any other person in the office would have impersonated you.

Graham/Graeme Underwood redirected you Brian to Pam the overall manager at the Classic. That evening Pam receives a call from Brian of Horton & Bidwill Christchurch lawyers. Question, ‘Was Julie providing a fax service for H-W, and was there a relationship between them'.

Days later Pam receives a further phone call, the caller claiming, 'it is Scotland Yard here', inquiring about H-W. Incidentally, he has never visited the Classic Motel.
If the caller had said, 'the family’ meaning the Mafia, would make one reach for a scotch.

The incoming caller numbers were not displayed, so an off shores call. Since your behaviour, and if a dozen or so faxes sent to Hill-Lee & Scott in New Zealand constitute Harassment, ‘American slang’ plus an arrival arrest, then it follows; your letter to legal aid dated 20 September 1999, was to besmirch the name of H-W etc is actionable.

Your email 18.12.2000 at 11:21 am, was in response to an account, and is actionable by your identification of H-W in the country of receipt. Quote in part ‘We will be notifying the service provider about the communication’ etc. Is an account only a communication nowa-days

In forty years of reading about human garbage, yet to read where a solicitor has written to a legal aid outfit, attempting to conspire and frustrate, if any applications for legal aid were forthcoming. I understand you TT NZD 98 1000 off shore for your client. Aiding and abetting what you referred to in your letter.

Where such a revelation made in their country, would be deemed, an invasion of their privacy. To breach the privacy of an individual is inherently unfair to that person as no court finality. We are not bound by any such internet constraints, against guttersnipes of our choosing.

Brian of Horton & Bidwill Christchurch lawyers, phoned the Emus Motel on the 13th October 1999. Julie had faxed Hill-Lee & Scott on behalf of a client. The fax machine used was a business link and not a motel owned fax... Header usually 333, just ask Jack Cowey at,

 http://www.whitepages.co.nz/quick/search?page=search&key=Dimension+Colour+Copy&lkey=Christchurch.&loc=ALL&x=24&y=23

A typed copy from the phone records to Hill-Lee & Scott.

6433790392 FaxStreem Calls-Itemized Rate Everyday
14 Sep 99 12:13 pm- $ 0.49
16 Sep 99 07:30 am- 1.10
29 Sep 99 07:44 am- 0.78
01 Oct 99 03:10 am- 0.57

Maurice Gordon Teague visited the Emus Motel on the 6/9/1999. Was just prior to the above date, of the ‘Brian’ of Horton & Bidwill of Christchurch lawyers call on the 13th Oct at 4 pm AUS. Since your email claiming aliases, in another country was located at a web cafes drop tray, this page was already in the public arena, and is now circulating. Palliser you have proof, from a court judgement, or are you just an UNMITIGATED fabricator.

Maurice Teague threatens the Emus motel manager, and may have passed on the motel name to Brian Palliser. Your first wife walked with NZD 50,000.00, who saw through you and in to your pocket. Vic warned you to stay away from his inheritance. What did you do, you went and finished of the legal matters for Teague. Guess someone in the office was more knowable than those ‘dogs’ at the revenue department, and slid something past, as it worked for M & M Teague. We both know this score.

There was an email, Hill-lee & Scott to Interpol, was read but lost before downloading, taken as a forgery and frightener. You might as well stand on the beach and tell the waves not to come in.

Palliser you breached the conflict of interest by failing to advise your client, you gave skiing lessons to the Teague's daughter. Holding hands, just look at it 'as thick as thieves'.

A fax setting out your motel phone calls, from the USA to Twin Towns typing then on to Hill-Lee & Scott. A reply to this web service from Hill-Lee & Scott. ‘If any more faxes are received, a formal complaint will be laid with the telecommunications company’.

A great pity Vic knocks on the wrong door, and throws away $10,000.00 on your “rats-arse” firm for nothing. Palliser, when you phoned to check on the fax senders, you were in fact working on the harassment 'fraud'.

You certainly have displayed low cunning and in addition, should not to be trusted. A manipulating thug style type. What ever you were injecting, yourself with at work, increase the dose substantially seeing that it will be your only defence. A detective warns Vic 'not to contact Brian Palliser's wife' but we shall. The detectives order to Vic, ties it all in together.

Guess there was, some fear of a reprisal over 'was there a relationship' call to the Classic motel. As read, your only interest was to tell your friends at the central station, a wiretap might be fruitful.

A typist gave out the easy way to track.  http://www.whitepages.co.nz

It is noted, neither M G Teague, chartered accountant of Clarkville, nor their company Mr Mushroom Ltd is phone listed, but his twin brother Ivon Teague is.

 http://www.whitepages.co.nz/quick/search?key=Ivon+Teague&lkey=++++Christchurch.&loc=ALL&x=19&y=18

Brian Palliser there is a very fine legal line between an irresistible impulse and an impulse to be resisted. Brian Scott Palliser you have crossed over this line.

Pack your bags and leave, as you are not a fit person to be a notary public and to practise law. Summing-up, a police informer, nark, stoolie, and acted with malice against your ex client...

Spam or junk mail is not harassment because internet users have to opt out rather than opt in. An anti-spam activist Glenn Barry said the lawsuit threatened ‘the right to complain and the right to block junk'. A company is suing Mr.J J McNicol for making unfounded complaints by exposing them on the web. The sum sought in this court case is $AUD 43,000.00. Legal fees could reach $US 100,000.00.

The New Zealand "Harassment" laws do not apply to e-mails from off shore. Although a separate case, this is the reason why “stalkers” MG & ML Teague was looking for the sender of mail originating from inside New Zealand.

You Palliser were working hand in glove with Maurice Gordon & Maude Linklater Teague “ swindlers police stoolies and stalkers, practised and accomplished liars’’ and the police. Palliser your credibility is zilch.

Will there be a professional collect. If Vic misses his father's funeral, it will be an interesting out come for you if a ‘wet boy' is sent in. Always makes commercial sense to tidy up ones affairs, do you not think.

Faithfully, Z Risk.
27th May 2002

OUR SECURITY FOR WHAT IT IS WORTH.
Use an Internet Cafe and prepare your floppy disk. Use a coin payphone if using another country. The person uses a public library; a computer, with 20 minutes left before the hour, if the library runs on hourly cycle usage.

Alternatively, use a gas station or shopping complex, use a freestanding email service. Unfortunately, they do not copy and paste. On the other hand, write e-mails on a personal organiser. Send a message through cyber space via a mobile phone to a host computer, which in turn can send a message to their destinations.

If a computer returns an email by not accepting specific words, just space the letters and resend.

Noted that Gordon Dollimore accountant and 'back yard hick typist, police stoolie’ has changed from BG Services [in the past, was not shown as Goods & Service Tax registered on his rare receipts] to BG Services Ltd, previously of 98 Middleton Rd Christchurch. Changed voluntarily or an Inland Revenue Department Audit... USA IRS...

Julie Newton from the Inland Revenue Department is also a 'police informer'.  julie.newton@ird.govt.nz

Police informer High Court Sheriff ‘powder poof’. Peter Fantham c/o  helen.vermeulen@courts.govt.nz End.

L SAYER.

Tuesday, 11 June 2002. Unfortunately, death smiles on us all. All one can do is smile back. When will you smile Brian?

MAURICE TEAGUE B. Com
Accountant
P O Box 120, Kaiapoi 8252
Phone (03) 327 8477
Fax (03) 327 8612
Email:  link@xtra.co.nz

Mr Jack Cowley
Dimensions Colour Copy Centre
Bush Inn Centre
Riccarton Road
CHRISTCHURCH

Dear Sir,
The reasons for my visit to your shop this morning were two fold.

Firstly...I am aware of highly defamatory material about myself eminating from your business and where your fax number is quoted as the source. The person using your services is a Mr (V J H W) who has already been held accountable for his actions by way of a judgement in my favour and others for defamation.

It is my understanding that notwithstanding your statement that you are not aware of the contents of the faxes you send, they are in these circumstances a breach of the Telecommunications Act. If as you stated in our conversation this morning you are still receiving instructions from Mr (W) and relaying them, and you persist in sending these messages I will take appropriate action.

Secondly... By Mr (W’s) own admission he has been sending you letters which contain damaging statements and serious accusations concerning myself. It was because of this action that I and others were awarded the full amount claimed in the proceedings for defamation taken against Mr. (W).

Although I realise that you cannot control letters and or faxes being sent to you, I consider you should encourage Mr (W) not to send you any more, and if he does, and I find that you are forwarding these letters on to others or disseminating the information yourself, I will take appropriate action against you.

If you are in any doubts as to your responsibility regarding these matters you should consult a solicitor.
Yours faithfully.

Singed M G Teague.

25/11/99

Sunday 1st April 2002. To M G Teague. Observations:

A “compulsive liar" writes the above letter, ‘Secondly... By Mr (W’s) own admission he has been sending you letters which contain damaging statements and serious accusations concerning myself.’

The only faxes to arrive at Dimensions Copy Shop with respect to you Teague were from 333, then manager of the Emus Motel, just after your threatening visit. In fact, you left your business card, so providing you contact details.
Vic was at Dimensions when the three faxes came through about yourself.

Your defamation judgement “swindle” was held in chambers. A highly unusual course of court action. Teague, you even out-smarted the news media, Just ass-hole reporters who did not report the judgement. Maurice Teague we have not corrected your poor English and misspelling, the same with Jack Cowey.

Teague you initially you paid the Beatrice May Estate a figure close to $80 thousand dollars to do with the subdivision, and would not accept any receipts. (Vic) Should have walked with the $80 thousand. At a later date, you formed Clarkville Developments Ltd. You over came your first “scam’ by writing various amounts in to the Heads of Agreement. Further down the track Clarkville Finance Limited. You and Maude kept CFL quite until you arrived at a shipping port with the intention of (Vic) signing your altered Heads of Agreement, just minutes before the ship was to sail.

The purpose of Clarkville Finance Ltd was to shift money from Clarkville Developments Ltd. In your case Teague, was to “steal” a greater sum of money than the Heads of Agreement provided for. Understand you Teague said ‘the law allowed me to do it’ still makes a “swindle.” (Vic) Phoned Simon Clay from Perth was informed, ‘That Teague had gone behind his back with a different Heads of Agreement.’

You admit same in your ANZ Bank Kaiapoi fax to the P&O Canberra. (V) Spotted you on the wharf and asked the purser to stop you. The Heads of Agreement document was nothing more than a document to “swindle.” Teague and Simon Clay wrote in that (Vic) had received an ex amount of dollars from Clarkville Finance Limited, which was formed months, after the $80 thousand payouts. You did not want any receipts. You Teague refused to make payments by cheque, and would only use the direct payment method. (Vic) Had no idea from where Teague’s payments came from.

Simon Clay,  email@laneneave.co.nz should have demanded proof from Teague that payments in fact were made from their account in Clarkville Finance Limited. Understand you Teague, made an abusive phone call to Simon Clay describing him ‘as a nigger in the wood pile for waking (V) up to what you were up to’.

Simon Clay keeps this call quite until the Heads of Agreement was signed in Singapore. Teague you will remember No. 10 Pentre Terrace, Cashmere. Teague during 1962 you drew up an option to purchase for your client, which was faulty at law. You were doing legal work as an accountant.

Of the three persons leaving the Supreme Court after losing the appeal, one should have finished you that day.

During 1996, a police person was talking to (V) father. After looking over his daughter’s fence, his comment. ‘(V) Must have done well out of the sub-division as he has had two world trips.’ Some person or persons in this “gutter type” Government organization had been monitoring him.

A stupid investigator in Canada said ‘we have a record of you entering the states on several occasions but not of leaving.’ Answered ‘takes at least ten years to catch your own spies. How many have died due to them.’

District Court Judge, No. 1, who struck out the Estate claim as being vexatious and malicious, No court notice of hearing, were delivered to the proper address. This Judge should start packing his bags.

District Court Judge ,No two, who granted Maurice Gordon Teague and whoever others a defamation judgement in chambers, without the proper notice being served on the defendant, is a “mongrel” and acted in an inept fashion, in a very unusual course of court action.

A stupid airline investigator in Canada said ‘we have a record of you entering the states on several occasions but not of leaving.’ Answered ‘takes at least ten years to catch your own spies. How many have died due to them.’

Vicky A Walsh “criminal” lawyer at  pappril@cyberxpress.co.nz Her client was going for a Jury trial and Walsh was trying to set him up along another avenue. Think long and hard before giving her any legal work.

Dimensions
COLOUR COPY CENTRE
At the Bush Inn Centre
Ph/Fax +64-3-343 3375, Ph: 343 3374
Saturday, 4th December 1999

MG Teague
PO Box 120
Kaiapoi
Fax (3) 327 8612

Dear Sir
I am in receipt of your fax subsequent to your visit on 25th November.

While you were telling me how you had won $400,000 in a defamation case against Mr (H W), you were holding a document, which you did not show me, but I assume was the specific document, which offended you.

I would be interested to know why you consider this document emanated from “dimensions” as I did not recognise it although as I said, we do not inspect every document, which passes through our hands. If the above document is where you obtained the spelling of my name then your fax proves that it did not emanate from “dimensions” as my name is misspelled and no one here would have made that mistake.

All photocopies, scans, calendars, Jigsaw puzzles, printed “T” shirts, Binding, Laminating, C.V.’s, references, letters and faxes are treated as confidential as you will realise, as when you attempted to obtain information from us and found we would not discuss customer information with you.

Mr (H W) deals with us on a variety of matters. Unfortunately I don’t recognise the letters in which “Mr. (W) admits he has sent (me) contain(ing) damaging statements and serious statements and serious accusations”, may be you would wish to send me copies so I can see them. I must tell you that he has made it a habit to have some documents typed in one place and sent from another, especially as businesses like ours can be extremely busy on a short time basis, and therefore unable to spend long times with one customer.

I would like to point out that all faxes sent from here have our name and local number in a banner across the top of each page and that if this does not appear then it did not emanate from “dimensions.” We do not hide these from time to time unlike some firms we have come across.

You stated on the 25th November that you had not contacted me previously, yet someone who identified themselves as Maurice Teague, Public Accountant, who wanted me to divulge information about our dealings with Mr (V W), phoned about 8 to 10 weeks ago and asked me to with an answer to a question, but when I phoned back a few minutes later I got a message to phone your brother, Ivan. I also had a call about 5 weeks ago from someone who wouldn’t identify himself who wanted me to divulge information about Mr (V W) and made about the same statement about the Telecommunication act as you did in the shop on Thursday 25th November 1999, and in your fax of that day.

It seems to me that you should make an attempt to mediate with Mr. (W) in order to resolve this matter instead of harassing me as you did on 25th November, bringing an unnamed witness with you and asking, before you identified yourself, if you could have a private conversation (obviously with your unnamed witness present) at a time when we were very busy. I can see no reason why we should refuse to do any work for a particular customer in case it may in the future offend another person. If we were to follow this request, any text used in any situation may offend, on a “T” Shirt or a mug or any other product we may make.

I suggest that you are attempting to interfere with my business and to have me operate in contravention of the “Privacy Act.” I will not discuss this matter further and I will not divulge private information to anyone. As I said above you should take these matters up with Mr. (W) so they are resolved.

Yours sincerely,
J E Cowey

Observations:
The Teague’s were there to make an “ass-hole” of you Cowey, and try and use you as a witness. The privacy act means leave this shop now, or I will call security. Not natter-natter. Unnamed witness was Maude Teague. (Vic) would not have sent faxes to you about Teague.

Remember Teague ‘is he tall, scruffy hair, ware a cap, and drive cars rego numbers.

The owners of the Edgeware Post Shop, tranmitted faxs to Denver, LA and one to Teague. Teague made a 20 minute call to one of the owners. After that, they refused Vic any further fax facilities.

A woman over 70 sends a fax from Moods Colour Copy to Teague. With in 2 minutes a phone call ‘Teague here if I receive any more faxes I will issue a writ for 100 Thousand dollars.’ The person who picked up Teague’s call was Mr. Moody in Papanui Road Christchurch. No doubt, his fax banner was showing. Several photocopy business persons drop off their fax numbers, to avoid abuse after sending accounts for off the street customers.

"STALKERS". MAURICE & Maude TEAGUE. The three faxes as one, censored to protect the innocent.
Faxes were transmitted to Dimensions Copy Centre.
+
Proprietor Fax Transmission
Date: 6/9/1999
Time: 12:00noon
Message: V, Ring urgent have just had M. Teague here.
Julie.

Fax Transmission
Date: 6/9/1999
Time: 1:55pm

Message: At about 11:50am on the 6/9/99 a man came to the reception desk. He did not say who he was. He started asking questions about Mr W. I asked who he was. He then gave me his business card. I said I did not want to get involved. He inferred that if I did not answer his questions I could be in trouble.

He asked if Mr W was still here, did he have a car, was he on his own, when did he leave (he wrote down 1 week), what unit was he in and what was his mood when he left.

He spoke of a court case on Monday and that he was leaving early on Monday for Christchurch. He also said he knew of Mr W’s PO Box and that he was going to the post office to talk to them. I said he still has the box.

Fax Transmission
Date: 11/9/1999
Time: 8:30pm

Message: V, at about 5:45pm I received a phone call asking for V. When asked who was calling, he said, “It is an old friend.” I said V was not here. He then said H W. He said he was in a bus and saw you walking along the road near the motel. I asked his name and phone number. If he should arrive I would pass the message on. He would not give me those details. I said, “He does not stay here all the time and does not book in ahead of arrival.”

I believe the man on the phone was Mr M G Teague who came to the motel on the 6/9/1999.

At 8pm on the 11/9/1999 I rang his phone in NZ and got a recorded message to confirm it was Mr Teague.

If I receive any more calls or visits from Mr M G Teague I will seek legal advice.
Julie (Manager) Red Motel.
+
Common knowledge that due to confidentiality requirements, Motel employees are not at liberty to give out names of guests or numbers of guests in rooms out to the general public. Mr Teague was enquiring as to the room number etc, of V W.

Mr Maurice Teague never spotted H W walking in the vicinity of the above Motel. Why would a Motel manager take any interest in who was walking near the Motel? Maude Teague was not present at Maurice Teague’s visit to the motel.

She was present at a photocopy business when Mr M G Teague enquired, Did they send faxes for a Mr H W. The answer was that they did not know an H W. Teague then enquired, “Do you know a V?” The staff said, “Yes”. Teague passed on the message, “Tell him to stay here because if he comes back to New Zealand the officials are waiting for him.”

I allege Maurice Gordon Teague is a police ‘nark informer’. Obvious no fax ID bar or Teague’s questions were unnecessary. ‘What sort of mood was he in when he left?’ Old police trick. Did he say anything about me? Teague working on his harassment and fear for his life swindle at that stage.

Leo Sayer.
6/26/2001.

Why would Maurice Teague lie about seeing V W. Think about this angle? If Maurice G Teague was taken out. Maude Teague may say, Maurice saw Vic near the motel. Better check on my late husband’s phone calls. Cunning before and after death, if it had accrued at that time. Maurice Teague carries a phone, not shown on his business card.

An ex nurse at the Indy car racing said 'if any person needs a test it be Maurice Teague’. A proper mental test. ‘Some one should get him'. This woman was on the receiving end, of a nasty letter from M G Teague some twenty years ago. Some woman do not forget.

Leo Sayer Tuesday, 21 May 2002

 http://www.yellowpages.co.nz/quick/search?page=search&view=&key=Highway+Guest+Lodge&stype=standard&lkey=Christchurch&search.x=18&search.y=23

Fax: +64-3-3553-128

Saturday, 18 May 2002

Typed by a snitcher Friday, 17 May 2002. 18:46:51

“Attempted bribery and stalking” at the Highway Lodge by Maude and Maurice Teague.

Part Fax 18/12/99 14:38 New Zealand time.

Highway Lodge Christchurch New Zealand. Page 01
To: Vic from Alan & Dorrie.

First Fax. On A/c of people, knowing your car is here. Have even offered us money for INFO that we won’t supply, Alan & Dorrie.

Second fax. Vic ‘Lady rang wanting to know what room you were in. Told her not staying here and that your car had disappeared last night’.

A note sent to Teague, that he has a reputation around the town for working shady deals and Christchurch is full of crooked accountants. Information from a chartered accountant now out of this business. The sole reason for the Teague’s visit to the Highway he was looking around the city for this accountant. In Teague’s mind, Cowan is an accountant and has a guesthouse maybe (V) stayed there.

Who else but Maude Teague would have made the sniffing phone call? BACKGROUND, MAURICE & MAUDE TEAGUE ARRIVED AT THE HIGHWAY GUEST LODGE, PAPANUI ROAD IN CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND, AND OFFERED THE COWAN’S AN UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF MONEY TO REPORT TO TEAGUE IF (H W) STAYED AGAIN.

IF THE COWAN’S DID NOT BELIEVE TEAGUE, JUST PHONE HIS LAWYER MICHAEL TIMINGS AT BARKER AND ASSOCIATES LAWYERS. AND HE WOULD CONFIRM THE TEAGUE’S OFFER AS VALID.
 lawyers@barkerassociates.co.nz May have changed.

Of cause, our man could have parked across the road, two birds with one stone.

Teague hoped the Cowan’s would say, “What figure do you have in mind” as all three are accountants. Complaints of “Attempted bribery” lodged with the “Corrupt Police” at Kaiapoi ignored. Victor told the file could not be found. Ten pages lost. If Maurice Teague in fact “feared for his life,” why did he appear at the Highway Lodge in the first place? In addition, the Edgeware shops, Motels on numerous occasions.

Moreover, ready to return to the Highway Lodge. Following (H W) along the South Eyre Road on one occasion. Teague may have been out to pick a fight, to have him arrested. No point in buying in to that as Maude and her two children would be alive to spend the money. Your photo Michael Timings, a lawyer and the part, you were prepared to play in the “attempted bribery” will bring you down.

Typed by Gary V Piercy.

A complaint was laid with the police and not actioned.