Futility of the two-state solution
KA | 07.06.2002 05:20
Futility of the two-state solution
by
Khalid Amayreh*
Source: Palestine Times February 2001 (Ptimes.com)
It is not hard to realize what prompted the Zionist regime to adopt the so-called “two-State solution” as the most expedient political device to end the Palestine question.
We all know that reaching true peace with the Palestinians and other Arabs and Muslims in the region has never been a real Zionist consideration.
Indeed, decades of Israeli bellicosity, aggression and hostile alliances amply testify to the Zionist aversion to peace and peaceful coexistence with neighbours. Moreover, Israeli leaders on the right and left don’t seem to have been suddenly transformed into true peace-lovers believing in generosity and self-abnegation.
In fact, the Zionists realize well that the two-State solution is in reality no more than a euphemism for the liquidation of the Palestine question.
They are absolutely right. The two-State solution would enable the Jewish State to arrogate 80%-84% of mandatory Palestine and deny the vast bulk of the estimated 4-5 million Palestinian refugees their inalienable right to return to their hometowns and villages from which they were expelled at gunpoint by Zionist troops and irregulars, or fled in fear, when the Zionist regime was established in 1948.
Furthermore, the scandalous arrangement would conceivably allow the Zionists, perhaps at some point in the future, to deport the already sizeable and growing Palestinian population still living in pre-1967 Palestine to the adjacent Palestinian “State” on the grounds that “this is our State and that is yours.”
Geographically and demographically, the two-State solution is nothing short of a gigantic scandal.
The nearly 8 million Palestinians worldwide would be given the West Bank and Gaza Strip, which make up less than 22% of Palestine and which are already congested beyond capacity (the Gaza Strip has the highest population density on earth).
In contrast, the estimated 5 million Jews now living in Palestine would be given the remaining 78%, along with the lion’s share of underground water, economic resources, arable land and other basic infrastructure essential for making a State viable and sustainable.
More to the point, the outlook for the two-State solution would even look grimmer and bleaker for the Palestinians if a significant number of Jewish settlements were allowed to remain in the West Bank because then we wouldn’t be really speaking about a prospective serious State or even a quasi-State but rather about a big joke, even if metaphorically called a Palestinian “State” and celebrated by the capitals of the world as the “ultimate embodiment and consummation of Palestinian national yearning for freedom and liberation.”
Now, what logic if any is there for accepting such an obscene obliquity? Would the Palestinian leadership be so gullible and so drunk to sign away Palestinian rights? Indeed, what kind of “peace” would emanate from the perpetuation of all these inequities and injustices which Palestinians have endured (and continue to endure) since the misbegotten birth of the Zionist regime, the source of all evils in the region.
Besides, what right does the Palestinian Authority and its aging leader Yasser Arafat have to allow ethnic cleansing to win?
It has absolutely no right, and that must be made crystal clear to Arafat and his advisors.
We are not here talking merely about symbolic values only, but rather about tangible material rights that don’t and won’t become obsolete with the passage of time.
Clearly, the recent signing of the “oath of return” by so many Palestinian refugees in Palestine as well as in the Diaspora is a clarion message to the world that the Zionist thieves will have to return whatever they had stolen to the original owners. Or else, how could there ever be a real peace that is worth the name?
A “peace” that is built on the perpetuation and “legitimization” of the biggest act of thievery in history, even if sustained by sheer military power and economic bribery, will not last for a long time.
This humane and equitable solution would necessarily require the dissolution and dismantling of the Zionist regime (Israel) and the establishment in Palestine of a democratic, non-racist, multi-religious and multi-ethnic civil State in which Jews, Muslims and Christians live together in peace and equality.
Such would be the State of Palestine of, for and by all its citizens irrespective of race and faith. A State where religious freedoms and justice are guaranteed for all. A State without checkpoints and roadblocks and without a justice system based on evil racism whereby child killers go free because the victim is perceived to be a child of a lesser God and the murderer a member of a chosen race.
Can’t an egalitarian State as such be a more humane alternative to the truncation of Palestine into “two States” laden with huge inventories of mutual bitterness and dormant enmities awaiting the first historical opportunity to explode into a fresh war?
-------------
* Khalid Amayreh lives in the West Bank Town of Al Khalil (Hebron) and is
the Editor in Chief of the Khalil Times.
KA
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Palestinian liar
07.06.2002 06:17
1) The name Palestine was invented in the year 135 AD Before it was known as Judea, which was the southern kingdom of ancient Israel.
2) According to visitors the land was never populated with Palestinians.
3) Mark Twain wrote he never encountered any humans on his whole journey.
4) In 1857 The Brits wrote the land was desolate and needs people to live there.
5) In 1882 the Turks recorded that only 141,000 people lived in Palestine.
6) In 1938 there were over a million Arabs living there. The population went from 141,000 to 1 million, because there were massive immigration by Arabs from Syria and Egypt to the land.
7) In 1922 The British government noted all of the illegal immigrants from Arab countries. Malcolm MacDonald, one of the principal authors of the British White Paper of 1939, which restricted Jewish immigration to the Land, admitted (conservatively) that were it not for a Jewish presence, the Arab population would have been little more than half of what it actually was.
8) (British) The Hope-Simpson noted all of the illegal immigrants pouring in from Arab countries.
9) In 1934 in a period of a few months over 30,000 illegal immigrants from Syria moved to Palestine.
10) The Arabs were lured there by the jobs the Jews had to offer.
11) The Roman name of Palestine was the official name given to the land in a mandate of Britain after WWI
12) Hadrian, Roman Caesar gave an edict to rename Judea as Palestine (from Philistine) in 132
13) At the time the land was named Palestine by the Romans (after the Philistines) The Philistines came to Israel from Crete in ancient times and weren't Semitic or descendants of Ishmael.
14) There has never been a nation of Palestine with a Palestinian government
15) Before 1948, Palestinians referred to themselves as greater Syrians, noting there immigration from Syria.
16) The Roman Emperor Hardian renamed Israel, Palestine after Philistines.
17) The Palestinians were invented by Egypt to destroy the Jews.
18) The Palestinians were invented by Yasser Terrorfat in 1964
19) The land was not settled with the Palestinians for hundreds if not thousands of years.
20) Palestine got it's name by the Arabs who settled there and adopted the name Palestine after of the Philistines.
Mark Twain's description of the Ottoman colony of Palestine in 1867:
A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds a silent mournful expanse. A desolation is here that not even imagination can grace with the pomp of life and action. We never saw a human being on the whole route. There was hardly a tree or a shrub anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of the worthless soil, had almost deserted the country."
Source: Mark Twain, The Innocents Abroad.
Dov
DOV
08.06.2002 04:29
Palestinians (their ancestors) have been living in the Land of Canaan, at least for the last 300 hundred thousand years. Yes: 300.000.000 years, as shown by carbone dated figurines recently discovered.
The name "filistinian" (men from the sea) was given to canaainites by romans. As far as 1800 yars before Christ, some "men from the sea" arrived in Palestine (i.e. the Land of Canaan) from Crete, and merged with the autoctonous population. There have been other invaders, earlier and later.
One of these invaders was Abraham, from UR, current Iraq, if Bible is taken into account, having it crystal clear that it is NOT a reliable historical source. This iraquian have fighted the indigenous canaainites, and ruled for 77 years. Just 77 years. After Solomon's death, infight almost destroyed them. The remaining iraquian (jews is an utter nonsense aimed at labelling an ethnicity, where there is only people saring the same religious beliefs), were expelled in the forthcoming decades.
The so called jewish kingdom in Palestine, is just another
fabricated zionist myth.
Xenoi
typing mistake
08.06.2002 04:42
>
From, not by.
And yes, ... it's being copypasted over there, anecdote of Mark twain included :))
xenoi