Ben-Eliezer presents two-state solution to Labour Party
Josh | 15.05.2002 20:35
A Palestinian state, a divided Jerusalem, a land swap and a special force for the Old City of Jerusalem were all part of the vision for a final-status settlement put forward by Defense Minister and Labor Party Chairman Benjamin Ben-Eliezer to his party's central committee Wednesday at Kibbutz Shfayim, north of Tel Aviv.
Adopting much of the plan put forward by former U.S. President Bill Clinton Plan at the Camp David Summit in July 2000, Ben-Eliezer spoke of a two-state solution to the conflict with a divided Jerusalem.
"The plan I am talking about is based primarily on a vision - a vision of two states, living side-by-side in peaceful co-existence - Israel and Palestine," Ben-Eliezer told the Labor Party members to loud applause.
"The Palestinian state will be established on the vast majority of Judea and Samaria [the West Bank] and Gaza," said Ben-Eliezer, adding that it would would enjoy territorial continuity. "Israel will also be open to a territory swap with the Palestinians," he said, referring to land close to the Green Line where settlements are located and which Israel would want to keep.
West Jerusalem and the Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem would form Israel's internationally-recognized capital, while the Palestinians would receive control of the Arab areas of East Jerusalem. Ben-Eliezer said it was in Israel's interests to relinquish control of the Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem, otherwise the Jewish majority in the capital would be threatened.
The Old City and the holy sites should be administered by a special force that would recognize the importance of these places to all sides, said Ben-Eliezer. There would be no final sovereignty over the Temple Mount, but rather an arrangement that was acceptable to all sides.
The Labor leader said he adamantly ruled out the right of return for Palestinian refugees, though said that under a final-status agreement, Israel would evacuate some settlements. The majority of settlers would live in settlement blocs that would be annexed to Israel.
Ben-Eliezer admitted that he did not view Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat as a partner for talks on a final-status agreement, but pointed out that if Israel were to present its "political vision," this would serve as a lever to pressure Arafat to abandon terror.
The proposal put forward by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah and adopted in March by the Arab League, he said, should be included in any political vision, though Israel should not accepted it verbatim. (The Saudi plan proposes Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza Strip in exchange for full normalization.)
Ben-Eliezer's plan envisions negotiations aimed at establishment of a Palestinian state on most of the territory of the West Bank and Gaza, with Israel annexing settlement blocs near the Green Line border with the West Bank. But the defense minister said that he did not believe in rigid timetables and that they would not necessarily help advance the process.
Ramon: Israel must unilaterally separate from Palestinians
Speaking after Ben-Eliezer, MK Haim Ramon outlined an alternative political solution, based on the idea of unilateral separation. Ramon, who plans to challenge Ben-Eliezer for the party leadership, said that in the absence of a Palestinian peace partner, Israel had to act unilaterally.
"Ehud Barak tried to reach final borders through negotiation," said Ramon. "He was prepared to make very generous compromises, but it didn't succeed. Not because of us, but because of Arafat. A unilateral border will serve as the border until there is someone to talk to [on the other side]."
Ramon criticized Ben-Eliezer for outlining a final status peace plan, saying Labor should not be arguing over arrangements in Jerusalem, when there was noone to talk to on the Palestinian side at present. "We are talking about how to divide Jerusalem, while they are killing us. It's a political mistake."
As part of a plan that would also include dismantling settlements, Ramon said Israel had to establish a border with the West Bank unilaterally, and had to withdraw its troops from much of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. "All of the IDF's losses are inside the Strip," he said. "The fence prevents infiltrations. But we are inside Gaza. We do not need a [Palestinian] partner in order to get out. And the same goes for Judea and Samaria."
If Israel waited for a peace partner, and did not move unilaterally to separate from the territories, Ramon warned, the country would be in danger of becoming "like South Africa," where a Jewish minority rules over an Arab majority in the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.
Former prime minister Barak said that Arafat, with international backing, must be brought back to the negotiating table "to the point before he turned to terrorism."
Barak also called for "security separation" between Israel and the Palestinians. "The fence around Gaza prevents suicide attacks inside Israel," he said. "There is no explanation as to why Israel cannot build a bigger, ten-times longer fence, and close off Israel and the settlement blocs [in the West Bank]," he said.
Josh
e-mail:
osh_josh_bgosh@nospam.hotmail.com
Homepage:
www.haaretzdaily.com
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
EndTheOccupation/RightOfReturnForRefugees
16.05.2002 15:42
It's the Palestinians who need security (Remember Jenin), since the 1930s at every point in the Zionist-Palestinian conflict at least five times as many Palestinians have been killed.
Any serious Peace Process must begin with an admission by Israel of its original sin - the founding of the State of Israel on the ethnic cleansing of its indigenous population.
Their is also the issue of reparations, Iraq is still paying Kuwait money for 4-5 months of ilegal occupation, what price must Israel pay for 35 years of ilegal occupation?
This solution seems quite similar to Barak's "Generous" offer in the past.
(For a good criticism of the sham of Oslo Peace Process, look up the Website of GUSH SHALOM (ISRAELI PEACE BLOC) which has an article - "12 Myths of the Generous Offer.
Once again the proposal offered by the Labour Party falls short of the minimum acceptable terms- implementation of all key UN Resolutions (i.e Complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from the West Bank & Gaza, a fully independent Palestinian State - not "autononomy" - a synonym for continued semi-colonial domination by Israel, and right of return of Palestinian refugees to Israel, not the West Bank or Gaza).
The reason why the Israeli Government has constantly denied the human rights of Palestinian refugees to return to Israel (a right that is enshrined in international law and been re-affirmed in countless UN resolutions) is racist.
Israel claims that return of refugees is not practical, yet academic studies by experts have shown it is feasible.
Since 1967 Israel has constantly claimed that it cannot absorp PALESTINIAN refugees, yet at the same time has been perfectly able to grant the "right of return" to thousands of JEWISH people from across the world.
The use of the term "right of return" for Jewish immigration into Israel is incorrect, as most of the Jewish immigrants have never lived in Israel, and neither have any members of their family.
The reason why Israel will never permit the return of Palestinian refugees is because it would effect the "Jewish integrity of Israel". Zionism is based on the premise of a state which must have a Jewish majority, and be run in the interests and for that majority.
It is not a Jewish state in the way France is a French state, it is a Jewish state in the way more akin to the way South Africa was a White state.
If the Jewish State had been established on the moon, this could not be a problem today.
But because Zionism aimed to establish a Jewish State in a region where in 1917 Arabs formed 90% of the population, and even in 1948 Arabs formed 70% of the population, the only way to establish a Jewish State was through ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population combined with huge Jewish immigration.
Yet even today Palestinians (or Israeli-arabs) form nearly 20% of the population of Israel and though in theory full citizens are victims of numerous discriminatory laws and practices (that in effect render them third-class citizens).
A serious worry to the Zionist establishment is the fact that the Jewish population is in decline (more people emigrate from Israel than into it), whereas the Arab population is on the rise (some demograpic experts say that Jews/arabs will reach parity in numbers in fifty years time).
True Peace will come with the De-zionisation of Israel. The solution will either be Two independent states - Israel and Palestine, with the right of return for refugees to Israel, and full equality for Palestinians living in Israel, or through the creation of One, Secular, Democratic state of Palestine, where Jews, Arabs, Christian, Moslem, Atheist will all have equal rights and full citizenship.
I oppose the idea of a Jewish State, just as I am opposed to the idea of an Islamic State, I believe in a state where everyone's voice whatever their creed, colour or race, has value and is heard.
The idea of a Jewish State was an understandable reaction to the brutal history of anti-semitism, but it has not worked.
Because you cannot found a state for one people on the dispossession of another people.
The best solution is for Israel to let go of the Zionist idea, stop defining itself as the State of the world wide Jewish diaspora, and like every other state in the world define itself as the state of it's citizens (of whom 20% are non-Jewish).
ANTONIUS CLIFFUS, JNR
Dov
16.05.2002 17:17
Dov
Thats right dov
17.05.2002 15:23
miker