IWCA election triumphs!! Socialist Alliance humiliation..
spankhurst | 08.05.2002 20:50
The Independant Working Class Association average 20% of vote in wards they stand in and have councillor elected for Oxford estate ward. The socialist Alliance get trashed
The IWCA,the Independant Working Class Association, did incredibly well in the recent local Elections. They stood in only 5 wards , Clerkenwell in Islington, Haggerston in Hackney, in Havering and in 2 wards in Blackbird Leys in Oxford. In all wards they got over 20% (!) of the vote and in 4 almost won while in Oxford they now have a councillor, represewnting this working class estate!! This compares very favourably with the BNP vote in Burnley and Oldham. The S.A. of the SWP was humiliated almost everywhere it stood. In the SWP heartland of Hackney where they have for decades boasted of hundreds of members their top vote for the nationally famous paul foot was not 10% of the vote.In many seats they got less than 100..(the Socialist Alternative of ex-miltant did better...with councillors elected in Coventry and Southwark(?))..The idiots that they are they have proclaimed these votes a sucess, at a time when left wing parties could( for better or worse!) be winning councils!
the IWCA were set up in the 90's by people from the street fighting Anti Fascist Action and Red Action and other individuals.They were created on the understanding that right wing groups in this country, following the lead of Le Pens Front National, were abandonning street fighting for door to door campaigning over dumped cars,housing and poor services..the IWCA also rightly pointed out the growing disillusionment of the white working class with politics and that the BNP had the potential of mobilising this. Their tactics are down to earth...they go door to door and ask people what they want for their area..these surveys have been a key their sucess..the idea that the left could actually ask working class people what they think instead of telling them what to think is also pretty unique!!
There are problems with the IWCA...is it honest? do its voters know it's connection with the republicans of RedAction? ..Red Action used to criticise Militants efforts in Liverpool in the 80's..is what the IWCA doing differrent??..are they just making promises they can't keep? shouldn't they be getting people to do things themselves instead of saying 'we will sort it for you'? etc..
to me though a clear message comes through...working class people are sick of the political establishment ... of being patronised ...of being told what to think...sick of their powerlessness... the anti-authoritarian/anarchist wing of the anti-capitalist movement must see in all this that working class people haven't given up on change..they've just been let down too many times...if we get stuck in we can change things around...keep on with the Maydays but don't neglect the nitty gritty ..the union work ..the tenants/residents association.. the estate commitee ...if you do capitalism will win..and you might find all your neighbours have allgone BNP!!! and check out the iWCA websites...they come up on Lycos and Yahoo searches
the IWCA were set up in the 90's by people from the street fighting Anti Fascist Action and Red Action and other individuals.They were created on the understanding that right wing groups in this country, following the lead of Le Pens Front National, were abandonning street fighting for door to door campaigning over dumped cars,housing and poor services..the IWCA also rightly pointed out the growing disillusionment of the white working class with politics and that the BNP had the potential of mobilising this. Their tactics are down to earth...they go door to door and ask people what they want for their area..these surveys have been a key their sucess..the idea that the left could actually ask working class people what they think instead of telling them what to think is also pretty unique!!
There are problems with the IWCA...is it honest? do its voters know it's connection with the republicans of RedAction? ..Red Action used to criticise Militants efforts in Liverpool in the 80's..is what the IWCA doing differrent??..are they just making promises they can't keep? shouldn't they be getting people to do things themselves instead of saying 'we will sort it for you'? etc..
to me though a clear message comes through...working class people are sick of the political establishment ... of being patronised ...of being told what to think...sick of their powerlessness... the anti-authoritarian/anarchist wing of the anti-capitalist movement must see in all this that working class people haven't given up on change..they've just been let down too many times...if we get stuck in we can change things around...keep on with the Maydays but don't neglect the nitty gritty ..the union work ..the tenants/residents association.. the estate commitee ...if you do capitalism will win..and you might find all your neighbours have allgone BNP!!! and check out the iWCA websites...they come up on Lycos and Yahoo searches
spankhurst
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
the results
08.05.2002 21:12
lenin
e-mail: lenin138@yahoo.com
vote for me
08.05.2002 23:02
I'll sort your problems
bash the socialists... typical...
09.05.2002 09:02
Socialism is a good ideal that never gets to see prime time, because everybody associates it with the Russian and china models,and everybody on the left wants to be more hardcore or anarchist, or anything other than called a commie.
face it, anarchy will never come about,unless there is rioting a la south central L.A. Humans are not capable of managing themselves peacefully; primitivsm is about the only tried and true method for peaceful anarchy, but that won't be happening for a long long while. So grin and bear it,and vote for a socialist or a green; they're good people and might just accomplish more than labour/democrats
blah blah
WORKING CLASS COUNCILLORS
11.05.2002 10:36
1/ We are not and have deliberately not said that we will substitute ourselves for self activity, ie we are not saying we will do it for you. on the doorsteps we made it clear that we did not have all the answers and the refusal to make promises was well received by people sick & tried of being let down or stabbed in the back. we are not a political party (altho we were required to register to stand in elections) but an association. we are not "building the party" but offering unconditional support to existing community organisations fighting for our interests. when we initiate activity it is always deemed a success or failure based upon how many other people get involved and start doing it for themselves.
2/ re the drugs stuff, we do not advocate beating up drug dealers as the solution (although in individual cases i don't think we would go out of our way to argue against it either). the IWCA has discussed this issue over and over for the last three years to my knowledge (maybe longer) and we have so far failed to reach a consensus. there exist arguments for the legalisation of all drugs and across the other side of the spectrum arguments for a more forceful community response.
what we are all agreed on, i think i can safely say, is that we aren't interested in what individuals do in the privacy of their own homes, but we are concerned about the impact drug use has on working class communities, mugging, burglary, overdoses (bad drugs), etc.
we don't have an answer to this and we have consistently said so. however, i am sure an answer is out there if working class organisations start to influence the debate currently dominated by the police, the middle class media and the govt's laughable drugs czar. one of the manifesto pledges in hackney was to call a genuine community conference on the issue.
3/ we do have a position on asylum seekers and it was argued on the doorstep when the issue came up, which was very rarely, i have to say. Harold Hill IWCA included the issue in their manifesto. if people expected us to make it a major issue in the local elections in areas where people told us during our initial surveys that they were overwhelmingly concerned with housing, anti-social behaviour and the cuts in community services, then you can join the simplistic chorus of "refugees welcome here" along with the rest of the Left.
THOM