Skip to content or view screen version

Kissinger Protest Report

me | 26.04.2002 04:13

Report from the anti-Kissinger protest in London 24th April 2002 - tried to upload this the other day.

The demonstration had originally been called by Globalise Resistance for around 8.30am in the morning to coincide with the start of the registration period for delegates attending the Institute of Directors (IoD) annual conference at the Royal Albert Hall, London. Kissinger the war criminal was due to speak at around 1pm. In the run up, the IoD changed the registration time to 7.30am, - many assumed this was to try and beat the protestors, who responded by changing the start time of the protest to 7.30am. In the end there weren't that many people there at 7.30am, although neither were there many delegates turning up at that time in the morning. The place was heavily guarded already, with police surveillance officers on the surrounding buildings as well as on the ground studying pictures of known protestors, some were on nearby scaffolding complete with climbing rope, and police dogs were stationed around the tall monuments opposite in the park - no doubt to prevent them being used to hang banners from - as well as mounted police in reserve further inside the park ground. The college next door had closed several of it's entrances, police vans were lined up in the surrounding streets, and enclosures made out of crash barriers had been prepared on the opposite side of the street. As people gathered outside the front of the Albert Hall a giant Kissinger puppet, complete with people dressed to represent corporate villains macdonalds and the military contained within the its pockets, provided the initial focus. A good deal of press turned out including BBC newsnight who are planning a Mayday feature programme for next Tuesday night, although they say it will mostly focus on trade unions and not anti-capitalists. As more people arrived through the morning a group gathered around the side of the Albert Hall where the delegates were arriving. Here people were harassed by the police and photographed almost continuously, some were threatened with arrest if they did not move further away from the entrance crash barriers. Later when the numbers around the side had swelled and they were chanting as delegates began to arrive more steadily, the police moved in to push people away. Without issuing a warning the group was surrounded by the police, who initially tried to push the group from both sides causing a crush. Large numbers of police then continued to push the tightly enclosed people as they shouted "Henry Kissinger - War Criminal" around the side of the building towards the front in what can only be described as a scrum formation. With much shouting and screaming I witnessed several police officers punching and kicking the surrounded demonstrators, one in particular, officer 1556, was seen repeatedly and deliberately kicking the ankles and shins of protestors - remember if a protestor retaliated and did this back just once, they would be arrested immediately. The police were obviously manoeuvring people towards the crash barrier pens on the opposite side of the road to the hall and as they stopped the traffic to push people over the road, the protestors tried to sit down. Scuffles broke out as police dragged those sitting to the pens and pushed them in. One person was thrown heavily to the ground a hit their head heavily, while people looked after the person the two police medics seemed more interested in finding out the persons name. Soon the majority of the group had been pushed inside the pens, but then the larger group of GR protestors next to the giant puppet further down moved into the road with flags and banners and staged another sit down - seeing this others rushed out of the pens to join them. With reinforcements arriving from the surrounding streets the police then surrounded them and again methodically photographed everyone. Before long the police were again dragging and lifting people from the road and taking them to the crash barrier pens as people chanted "This is what democracy looks like" - a long succession of people were paraded past the cameras as other officers confiscated and destroyed banners and flags. The mood was mixed with some officers obviously being treating people with care, others being more violent in their treatment of protestors. It was interesting to see the photographs of the protests on Indymedia, as it seemed that some of the roughest treatment was reserved for some of the key people from Globalise Resistance - one carried away from the sit down supported by his throat, the other subjected to fully intentional and painful wrist locking. There was a pause in the proceedings as the police left a now smaller group sitting in the road before then removing them. A friend taking photographs from the park opposite which was now full of police told how he was ordered to leave the park by an inspector and told to stop taking pictures because he was 'inflaming the situation', this depite various corporate journalists standing on ground level next to the crash barriers where people were being carried. This pattern was repeated as the police removed people form the street but left others who dressed smarter. The street was re-opened to traffic as the crowd now mostly within the crash barriers chanted anti-kissinger slogans. A Reuters journo later turned up at 10.30am and began to write his article about the earlier protest. Police photographers continued to snap people for the police files. A business woman in a creme power suit passed by and shouted to police "you should throw them all in prison - scum!". What impressed me most was the peacefulness and calm of the protestors when faced with some instances of obvious police violence, and the support everyone gave to each other. Shouts of "keep it fluffy" mingled with campaign slogans, and people seemed to be confident in the actions they were taking. All in all there were around 200 people there during the morning, and the IoD delegates were well aware of the protest, as no doubt was Kissinger. I left before he arrived so I don't know what happened then but I know people stayed there protesting. Background: Henry Kissinger was Richard Nixon’s Secretary of State, his second in command. He was a driving force behind the US war on Vietnam which killed 1 million Vietnamese people. Kissinger was directly responsible for ordering the carpet-bombing of Cambodia in 1969. He gave full backing and military assistance to the Pinochet coup in Chile, later sanctioning the murder of Orlando Letelier in Washington in 1976. Kissinger backed the Pakistani government in opposing Bangladeshi indpendence. Once again he supplied arms and intelligence. He gave the go-ahead for the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1975. Over 200,000 people were killed as a result. He was also responsible for souring relations between Turkey, Greece and Cyprus, a division which still produces murder and maiming. Kissinger’s legacy of American brutality around the world survives. He remains a hero to the warmongers in Washington and Downing Street. Kissinger Associates’ clients have included Union Carbide, Coca-Cola, American Express, ITT Lockheed, Arco and HSBC. Links: The Trial of Henry Kissinger http://www.trialofhenrykissinger.org Materials connected with Christopher Hitchens' book, which argues that Kissinger should be tried by an international tribunal for war crimes. Includes excerpts from the book, reviews, discussions, links etc. Profile of Henry Kissinger http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/feature_kissinger_profile.shtml "Balanced" BBC account of the "Nobel Prize winner, football fan and alleged war criminal" East Timor Action Network Kissinger Pages http://www.etan.org/news/kissinger Evidence that Kissinger gave the green light to Indonesia's invasion of East Timor, which was followed by genocide Chile Documentation Project http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/latin_america/chile.htm Forcing the American government to publish documents which prove that the US, including Kissinger, were behind the Pinochet coup in Chile. More links at GR webpage: http://www.resist.org.uk/reports/archive/misc/kissingerinfo.html

me

Comments

Hide the following 12 comments

yeah, ok, I was a bit late...

26.04.2002 08:24

I was that reuters journalist that was late... Sorry! But I had two other colleagues there way before me, a photograper and another journalist who was actually filing the story. I was just brought in as an extra pair of hands.
But you're right I should have been there earlier. PLEASE don't think that all journalists are corporate automatons. I'm sick of tabloid posturing too. It pisses me off that every time there's a big demo some sunday times fuckface claimes that he's got some anarchist expose.
This is all about much more than our own personal egos/prejudices.

Andrew


ok I was late..

26.04.2002 08:58

I was that reuters journalist that was late... Sorry! But I had two other colleagues there way before me, a photograper and another journalist who was actually filing the story. I was just brought in as an extra pair of hands.
But you're right I should have been there earlier. PLEASE don't think that all journalists are corporate automatons. I'm sick of tabloid posturing too. It pisses me off that every time there's a big demo some sunday times fuckface claimes that he's got some anarchist expose.
This is all about much more than our own personal egos/prejudices.
To say that me turning up and filing a report about something that I hadn't seen as being a damning indictment of the media is bullshit.

Andrew


more on protest and police behaviour

26.04.2002 08:58

Just a couple of extra comments:

With regards the protest around the side, the police seemed to take the opportunity to surround the protesters when a number of people sat in the road. Other people were then thrown in the cordon and started to try to push their way out. Whilst the police found it expedient to get the people back to the main protest, it still meant that people had to actively push the line in order to move anywhere and I believe that it was a good thing to try to move from the very claustrophobic cordon that had been formed.

Also it wasn't just GR activists that were targetted violently. Known anarchists were also targetted both in the scrum and afterwards. After this, a group of four managed to get through the police cordon and into the park. They sat on a park bench to have a fag and some water and to recover from some of the violence that they had just been subjected to. As they were sitting there, FIT turned up with a cop from the Parks police. They informed the group that they weren't allowed to remain in the park and that they were required to leave. They explained their intention to sit peacefully for a few minutes, but one woman, who was particularly targetted was suddenly dragged off the bench and halfway across the park by her neck.

I'm not entirely sure it was a successful protest, unless you want to define the success of a protest by the level of state violence and repression. Not enough people turned up - I read one criticism that it was too early. If activists can't be arsed to get up early if necessary, then what kind of movement do we have and what hope do we have of trying to build any kind of alternative? I don't feel I achieved anything other than a myraid of bruises and aches that I'm still recovering from.

Maybe I'm just getting old and cynical; I'm pleased that people attempted direct action, but we didn't have the numbers to achieve anything viable. Whilst our presence was felt and noticed and this is certainly better than nothing (I'm glad we were there), I just have grave reservations about calling it a success.

another participant


corporate media lies

26.04.2002 11:29

andrew, no one's criticising your ego etc - criticism of the corporate media centers around its structure, not the personalities of individual journalists. the corporate media is owned, without exception, by incredibly wealthy capitalists - hence 'corporate media' - it is made up of corporations. it is also dependent on other corporations for funding through advertising money, without which it would not be able to compete with other media corporations and would go under. journalists working for it simply cannot print anything too radical since it would lose advertisers and the editor, who is accountable to the owner, would get in trouble. to put it simply, a corporation which is accountable to other corporations is hardly going to print stories which are anti-corporate. gov't owned media such as the bbc is supposed to be 'impartial', which means it presents a balance of opinion between the 'different' main political parties - but the status quo is, once again, always upheld with very, very few exceptions.
so when we slag off the corporate media we are not saying that you personally are an arsehole, but we ARE saying that your work will necessarily be biased in favour of the existing, unfair power arrangements and is an integral part of a system which privilages corporations with immense, undemocratic and highly destructive power over the lives of ordinary people, the environment etc. you seem like a nice guy - don't you think you are on the wrong side?

(A)


not a success, but still

26.04.2002 12:15

To "another participant", hey, don't let yourself go down!
No, it wasn't a success, but it wasn't a failure either.
If Kissinger came and no one protested, then, yes, that
would've been a failure !

This is just the continuation - it's not a success, it's not
a failure, it's just the same old same old, bastards, police
and protestors, once again. It feels like we're going
nowhere, it feels disempowering, but, as you very well
known, at least we're not going backwards (well, at least
not to quickly...)

But please, cheer up. There's a moon up there, and, yes,
look closely : there are flowers and rabits on the moon. And
the rabits are talking with carrots, all dancing around a
giant purple cow, slowly chewing some grass it picked up
on mars. This _is_ the real world, the world we should be
living into, the world where flying cheese is a common
thing. Nothing else matters. I lived the life I lived,
I lived it where I lived it, and I'll enjoy it while I can.
Yes, I'd like to make the world a better place (according
to those ethics of mine), and yes,I do wake up early
for it. But if the others don't want to, then sod it.
Life will bring me where it will bring me, and I will do
what I will do, in time, and for the rest of it, well,
I can always fly to the moon when I feel like it.

Look outside your window. There's a flying whale, there.
Slowly moving, drifting. You can even talk with it (if it's
not too shy!). Yes, if more people could understand this,
then the world would be a better place.

In the mean time, well, I'll go on waking up early, trying
to get others to wake up early, and well, whatever happens
then will happen. It doesn't matter.

yet another participant


O, GOD ! Are you still going on about it ?

26.04.2002 14:50

GR /SWP finally do something vaguely laudable and well, just look how they crow about it !
No, I think this was a deliberate attempt to regain the ground they lost with the radical movement; remember, the SWP had a closed convention last week and I imagine some of the criticisms "went home" so to speak.

GR / SWP: A New Stalinism and A New Fabianism

One of the main points behind the dialectical philosophy of GWF Hegel (and thus to Marx) is Inversion of Polar Opposites, whereby you can end up with the exact reverse of what you try to achieve:
in GR, which is prima facie overwhelmingly "Trotskyist" , we see all the signs of Stalinism, with meetings suprressing all spontaneous debate and where external criticism is condemned for "sectarianism" and "counter-revolution", with blatantly bourgeois sentiments courted whilst workers are effectively excluded (Cf the Fabians) and even, in the shape of a certain prominent young activist, a grotesque "Cult of Personality", in this case more smarm than charm (!) but still a cause for concern...

acorn tributor


predictable...

27.04.2002 10:33

I knew someone would post something saying ooh this wasn't real direct action, it was a cynical attempt to look radical by GR.

Give it a rest just once. This protest had been planned for ages mate.

Where you there by any chance?

-


Excellent Report

27.04.2002 12:22

This report was written by someone who must have been standing right next to me for much of the early part of the morning and is an excellent and well-written summary of events.

One thing I'd like to add is that demonstrators must learn from the police tactics. Although I was haranguing delegates at the side door, I didn't get corralled by the police because I kept my eyes open and was alert to their tactics. As they began to surround the protest group, I stepped outside of the group into the road and then watched as they were surrounded and then pushed and bullied away from the entrance and across the road.

Protestors should learn to keep their eyes open and start spreading out and doing walkarounds and runarounds to avoid getting trapped and to keep things moving.

When most demonstrators were penned in and held across the road from the Hall, I was busy quietly sidling up to delegates arriving at the side and talking to them, hassling them, and leafletting them. I actually got a couple of them to talk to me and one in particular was unaware of Kissinger's background, was very interested in what I had to say, and took several leaflets from me to try to give to his friends.

I feel that what I was able to do outside of the main protest and the pen was useful in its own way. Perhaps by spreading out and keeping moving, more demonstrators could have done actions like this and avoided ultimately futile confrontations with the police.

rikki


"GIVE IT A REST MATE"

27.04.2002 14:13

You forgot to say "On your bike", "Oppit" and "Dont be childish", perhaps accusing me for a police provocateur along the way. Still,
I have to say Its very peculiar how quickly the "rehabilitation" of GR has come, but on what evidence ? i wait to see if they are as prepared to mount such protests as these against the British ruling Labour party in total (not just Blair) before I change my opinion.
Certainly the protest would have been planned in advance, (so you say and I assume youre right) but the mode thereof could have been determined much later. Ok, I simply warn you about the danger that is GR / SWP, not expecting much heed, but Now I know how the real Trotsky must have felt in those dark days of the 1930s.

Acorn Tributor


Avoiding police tactics

28.04.2002 10:12

Whilst I agree that people should be aware of police tactics, keep alert, keep mobile etc., these should be standard for anyone attending any demo, a number of us found it impossible to stay outside of the police cordon.

A number of us spent the early part of the morning moving around, trying to stay outside police lines, although this is something which is very difficult when constantly followed by FIT.

I was more than aware that a tight cordon was being formed. I also tried to stay outside that cordon, but I was obviously targetted by police and violently thrown into the cordon.

Maybe the person who managed to stay outside the cordon isn't known to the police. If so, fantastic, use whatever advantage is there. However some of us are not so lucky and wish it was as easy as was made out in the previous posting.

another participant


Well done Rikki

29.04.2002 20:14

Rikki

You've got the right idea. I would have like to have done something like what you did. I had similar success with shoppers on Oxford Street a few months ago. Unfortunately last Wednesday I could not escape the police pens and ended up having a very bad day. More details in a few days.

Cheers Gary Jarvis

Gary Jarvis
mail e-mail: yesgaryjarvis@hotmail.com


Great demo - shame about the arrests

30.04.2002 18:54

In addition to yesterday's comment. I appeared at Bow St Magistrates Court today. Result, after a plead of guilty to disorderly conduct (originally a charge of theft - for taking and immediately throwing a police of helmet) a fine of 255 pounds.

Gary Jarvis, considerably poorer.

Gary Jarvis
mail e-mail: yesgaryjarvis@hotmail.com