London, Monopolise Mayday - beware of pretenders.
jimmy , Apr 2 2002, reposted I | 03.04.2002 09:32
by jimmy Tue, Apr 2 2002, 7:34pm reposted from Indymedia Ireland
Monopolise Mayday
Globalise Resistance - which styles itself as the anti-capitalist movement, but has been dubbed by others Monopolise Resistance has teamed up with the London May Day Organising Committee, which is linked to the Greater London Trades Union Council and South East Region TUC, to host an event called United for Mayday. The announcement from Globalise Resistance proudly boasted that: This is also the first time a march will go to Trafalgar Square while Parliament is sitting. May Day is building up to be another incredible event.
The London May Day Organising Committee was more honest: Marches to Trafalgar Square are forbidden on days when Parliament is in session, under a Sessional Order dating from 1829. Despite this, the Mayor of London has made the Square available to us and the Metropolitan Police have agreed to the march, on the understanding that this does not set a precedent and that the march will be disciplined and orderly.
Of course, Trafalgar Square is simply an empty space. If Globalise Resistance, the London May Day Organising Committee or anyone else wanted to hold a demonstration there they could simply do so without seeking permission. Numerous anti-capitalist events have been held in London and elsewhere, without the state being consulted.
Behind the Globalise Resistance bluff, what is planned is the usual boring march, taking much the same route as in 2000, followed by a rally at which the speakers will include Tony Benn, Barry Camfield (T&G), Ruth Winters (FBU), Mark Serwotka (PCS), Diane Abbott MP plus other MPs. trade unionists,environmentalists and anti-capitalists [i.e. Guy class traitor Taylor and other Globalise Resistance members]. Excitement indeed!
Having begged the state for permission, Globalise Resistance obviously have good reason to be grateful. But behind this ridiculous posturing lies the serious problem of the lack of a revolutionary critique of the state. We can not forget how last Mayday the state waged an unprecedented campaign against those anti-capitalists, revolutionaries and others who wanted to gather in central London to celebrate Mayday. The press was used to disseminate misinformation, lies, smears and threats. The cops made open threats of violence, whilst Lord Harris, the Labour peer and Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, called for the cops to shoot protesters. Mayor Livingstone, the enfant terrible of the labour camp (who Globalise Resistance
and their parent SWP had supported in his election campaign), placed paid-for adverts in newspapers warning people to stay away. Even the Home Secretary and Blair got in on the act. On the day itself Globalise Resistance marched straight into the cops trap by turning up at Oxford Circus
We need to consider the nature and purpose of the United for Mayday alliance and question the nature of the unity. The minor trade union bureaucrats in the London May Day Organising Committee have for years organised a pointless and boring traditional march in London. Over the past two years they have lamented the attention given to anti-capitalist actions: If you read or watched the mainstream media you would have
thought the only things going on were the protests of the anti-capitalist coalition. The coverage ranged from the death of civilisation as-we-know-it to sorting out your fashion statement as a WOMBLE or spikey. No attention was given at all to, what has been characterised as, the boring old trade union May Day March which went from Highbury Fields to Clerkenwell Green. (Statement of the Organiser of London May Day Organising Committee, carried in Voice of the Unions see the similar article in The Morning Star 2/5/01)
For them the link up with Globalise Resistance offers a
perceived route to credibility. The trade union and labour hierarchy, who for years paid at best lip service to Mayday, fears the growing militancy amongst some sections of the working class and the possibility of a genuine link up with anti-capitalists, which may lead to the adoption of the tactics of direct action and the rejection of sterile trade union and electoral politics. No doubt they have an eye on the local elections on
May 2nd. They are backing United for Mayday as a safety valve.
Globalise Resistance also wants a safe alternative to openly defiant actions. Last year they discovered anti-capitalism and joined the actions in Oxford Circus. However, the illegal nature of the action obviously proved to be too much, so a safer form of protest had to be found. Globalise Resistance is, we should
remember, a front for the Socialist Workers Party. In the guise of another front, the Socialist Alliance, they too will contest the elections on May 2nd. Last year the sigh of relief amongst Globalise Resistance/SWP activists when the election was
postponed was all too apparent, but it will not happen this year. They cannot risk trouble on Mayday and present themselves as good bourgeois democrats the next day, particularly when they have real hopes of picking up a few council seats and being allowed to participate in the rationing of local services. At the
same time however they must dress up their Mayday proposal as the radical alternative, to satisfy those who do not share their electoral
The third party to this alliance is the state. The state's interest is all too obvious. Last year, despite the huge campaign, the state failed to deter a significant minority from coming to central London. Since then we have witnessed Genoa, the uprising in Argentina, the war on Afghanistan and, in the run up to Mayday, preparations are in full swing for a renewed war against Iraq. This year, having sanctioned a demonstration in central London, in Trafalgar Square, the state will be use this to justify state violence against anyone who dares to defy the false unity and takes action elsewhere in London. However, anyone wanting to consider the risk of being in Trafalgar Square needs to look no further back than Mayday 2000, when large numbers of people were attacked by the cops. As last years Mayday Monopoly Game Guide warned: Remember this is their territory, the place they want us!
related link: www.schnews.org.uk/mr.htm
Monopolise Mayday
Globalise Resistance - which styles itself as the anti-capitalist movement, but has been dubbed by others Monopolise Resistance has teamed up with the London May Day Organising Committee, which is linked to the Greater London Trades Union Council and South East Region TUC, to host an event called United for Mayday. The announcement from Globalise Resistance proudly boasted that: This is also the first time a march will go to Trafalgar Square while Parliament is sitting. May Day is building up to be another incredible event.
The London May Day Organising Committee was more honest: Marches to Trafalgar Square are forbidden on days when Parliament is in session, under a Sessional Order dating from 1829. Despite this, the Mayor of London has made the Square available to us and the Metropolitan Police have agreed to the march, on the understanding that this does not set a precedent and that the march will be disciplined and orderly.
Of course, Trafalgar Square is simply an empty space. If Globalise Resistance, the London May Day Organising Committee or anyone else wanted to hold a demonstration there they could simply do so without seeking permission. Numerous anti-capitalist events have been held in London and elsewhere, without the state being consulted.
Behind the Globalise Resistance bluff, what is planned is the usual boring march, taking much the same route as in 2000, followed by a rally at which the speakers will include Tony Benn, Barry Camfield (T&G), Ruth Winters (FBU), Mark Serwotka (PCS), Diane Abbott MP plus other MPs. trade unionists,environmentalists and anti-capitalists [i.e. Guy class traitor Taylor and other Globalise Resistance members]. Excitement indeed!
Having begged the state for permission, Globalise Resistance obviously have good reason to be grateful. But behind this ridiculous posturing lies the serious problem of the lack of a revolutionary critique of the state. We can not forget how last Mayday the state waged an unprecedented campaign against those anti-capitalists, revolutionaries and others who wanted to gather in central London to celebrate Mayday. The press was used to disseminate misinformation, lies, smears and threats. The cops made open threats of violence, whilst Lord Harris, the Labour peer and Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, called for the cops to shoot protesters. Mayor Livingstone, the enfant terrible of the labour camp (who Globalise Resistance
and their parent SWP had supported in his election campaign), placed paid-for adverts in newspapers warning people to stay away. Even the Home Secretary and Blair got in on the act. On the day itself Globalise Resistance marched straight into the cops trap by turning up at Oxford Circus
We need to consider the nature and purpose of the United for Mayday alliance and question the nature of the unity. The minor trade union bureaucrats in the London May Day Organising Committee have for years organised a pointless and boring traditional march in London. Over the past two years they have lamented the attention given to anti-capitalist actions: If you read or watched the mainstream media you would have
thought the only things going on were the protests of the anti-capitalist coalition. The coverage ranged from the death of civilisation as-we-know-it to sorting out your fashion statement as a WOMBLE or spikey. No attention was given at all to, what has been characterised as, the boring old trade union May Day March which went from Highbury Fields to Clerkenwell Green. (Statement of the Organiser of London May Day Organising Committee, carried in Voice of the Unions see the similar article in The Morning Star 2/5/01)
For them the link up with Globalise Resistance offers a
perceived route to credibility. The trade union and labour hierarchy, who for years paid at best lip service to Mayday, fears the growing militancy amongst some sections of the working class and the possibility of a genuine link up with anti-capitalists, which may lead to the adoption of the tactics of direct action and the rejection of sterile trade union and electoral politics. No doubt they have an eye on the local elections on
May 2nd. They are backing United for Mayday as a safety valve.
Globalise Resistance also wants a safe alternative to openly defiant actions. Last year they discovered anti-capitalism and joined the actions in Oxford Circus. However, the illegal nature of the action obviously proved to be too much, so a safer form of protest had to be found. Globalise Resistance is, we should
remember, a front for the Socialist Workers Party. In the guise of another front, the Socialist Alliance, they too will contest the elections on May 2nd. Last year the sigh of relief amongst Globalise Resistance/SWP activists when the election was
postponed was all too apparent, but it will not happen this year. They cannot risk trouble on Mayday and present themselves as good bourgeois democrats the next day, particularly when they have real hopes of picking up a few council seats and being allowed to participate in the rationing of local services. At the
same time however they must dress up their Mayday proposal as the radical alternative, to satisfy those who do not share their electoral
The third party to this alliance is the state. The state's interest is all too obvious. Last year, despite the huge campaign, the state failed to deter a significant minority from coming to central London. Since then we have witnessed Genoa, the uprising in Argentina, the war on Afghanistan and, in the run up to Mayday, preparations are in full swing for a renewed war against Iraq. This year, having sanctioned a demonstration in central London, in Trafalgar Square, the state will be use this to justify state violence against anyone who dares to defy the false unity and takes action elsewhere in London. However, anyone wanting to consider the risk of being in Trafalgar Square needs to look no further back than Mayday 2000, when large numbers of people were attacked by the cops. As last years Mayday Monopoly Game Guide warned: Remember this is their territory, the place they want us!
related link: www.schnews.org.uk/mr.htm
jimmy , Apr 2 2002, reposted I
Comments
Hide the following 14 comments
peaceful protest
03.04.2002 10:58
Guardian
Homepage:
http://www.youngrebels.com
old news
03.04.2002 11:21
Listen, if people want a legal march on Mayday, thats fine. If Trades unionists want to march, thats even better. If anarchists want to run around in Mayfair, thats cool too.
I am pissed off with sectarians who think that the struggle belongs to them.
Both anarchists and trotskyists can be sectarian and up their own arse, in there own ways.
Yes, the SWP are arrogant. But so are anarchists. And stop being so fucking childish...as if its really r-r-r-revolutionary to get arrested, etc. Been there, done that, but sometimes I just want to march around, dance, shout, but stay legal.
So stop denouncing the Trades Unionist march.
Yes, radical anticapitalists started the latest phase of the movement a few years ago. Now other, larger forces are joining in. Workers are beginning to strike. Thats good. Of course all sorts of reformist bureacracies are bound to follow. But you can't avoid this by staying pure, and sticking to tried and tested tactics. RTS style actions looked fresh and new in the late 90's. But now you keep trying to reproduce them, in a stale way. Meanwhile police repression escalates and spoils the party.
I think workers organisations joining in is a step forward, and sounds a lot more fresh and new than the usual old anarcho-shit that the media/police/state are used to by now, and have found out how to deal with.
Stop playing their games. THINK before reposting old sectarian rants.
The only problem with the GLob Res/TUC march is that they did not talk to the other mayday coordinations, so that we could have all joined in with the march, and gone on to do other stuff.
Come out of your ghettos. Lose your anarcho and trot dogmas.
Love, life, peace, freedom! :)
bored
Support Globalise Resistance March Mayday
03.04.2002 11:39
I really think it's time to stop being sectarian, , Jimmy you are not the chosen one the possessor of the universal truth.Let's buld together as a united front against capitalist globalisation, anarchists, greens, marxists etc. etc.
At a time like this why try to look for minor differences that separate us- There is an upsurge in activism against war, globalisation, privatisation so let's build together, stick together, march together , protest together. Forget sectarians like Jimmy, attitudes like yours will divide our strength and let the capitalists win- is that what you really want??
Lithium Joe
Lithium Joe
GR Mayday
03.04.2002 11:44
I really think it's time to stop being sectarian, , Jimmy you are not the chosen one the possessor of the universal truth.Let's buld together as a united front against capitalist globalisation, anarchists, greens, marxists etc. etc.
At a time like this why try to look for minor differences that separate us- There is an upsurge in activism against war, globalisation, privatisation so let's build together, stick together, march together , protest together. Forget sectarians like Jimmy, attitudes like yours will divide our strength and let the capitalists win- is that what you really want??
Lithium Joe
Lithium Joe
Sectarian or Princpled?
03.04.2002 15:57
GR is an umbrella front for the SWP; they do their best to hijack the movement so they can 'control' it; remember, the SWP is "at the heart of the movement", though I feel they mean this by proxy rather than directly so.
It is wise to keep people informed of what different groups are up to. Being critical of pandering to the demands of the state is not sectarian, its principled. Lets keep the two words separate - for when we really need em eh?
ZeroZero
Principled?
03.04.2002 16:00
Lets keep the two words separate - for when we really need them.
ZeroZero
Theres nothing worse than when
03.04.2002 16:18
well, Guy and chums, it ISNT ! The Labour party arose , late, out of general malaise in a Britain which failed to have revolutions; dont give me 1642 or 1842 ! The Diggers and Levellers failed, as did Cromwell, and the Chartists were a miserable flop . Can YOU name a prominent Chartist ?
No, and the SWP-GR will end up in the same ignominy.
It is the responsibility of the independent socialist movement to know WHEN to FOLLOW but ALSO when to take INITIATIVE, or BREAK with a movement heading for disaster.
As it is, the SWP-GR have failed to act in this way; instaed of championing the cause of social liberation in Britain, they swamped it and they will bear the culpability for why Blair staeyd in power all these years
triffid
GR/SWP working with the cops on Mayday
03.04.2002 17:17
the Labour Party conference when SWP stewards
were openly working with the police to deter
the WOMBLES attending, this led to 5 comrades
being arrested. Any attempts by Anarchists to
de-arrest them were thwarted by SWP stewards
[this included Martin Empson of SWP and a leading
figure in GR]. The London Mayday committee have said
that they will be working very closly with the
police and the other stewards on the March to
stop anarchists "hijacking" the demonstration.
Unless GR/SWP pull out of the March and denounce
the Stalinists in the Trade Union Movement then
I think anarchists and other revolutionaries
should respond accordingly.
@
@
e-mail:
.
Homepage:
.
A Good Kicking For The SWP In Order
03.04.2002 20:24
Tony Cliff
Condition of membership
03.04.2002 20:31
These people must not be allowed to get away with this: they should be denounced from the roof tops as the real enemys of the movement...
Or we could just pull up sharpish and take turn down Reality Street. If any of you have been involved in the movement for any length of time you'll know that the job of a steward on any legal demo is to make sure there as few casualties as possible. The people in Brighton that day were in the main trade unionists attending what has become an annual march to demonstrate at the conference of the governing party - they had not gone to give the filth the opportunity to try out some new toys in aftermath of September 11.
What the stewards did that day was to make sure that only those who wanted to get arrested did. The press was full of the police's intention to arrest anyone dressed in white overalls and that's exactly what they did. There were a few there who tried to look as if they wanted a go at the police, but as they outnumbered the stewards and could have just moved past them if they were serious and didn't, they were probably just posers.
Now it seems a whole mythology has sprung up around this event centering on an axis of evil between GR/SWP and the state. This is deeply sad because it makes the people who promote it seem ridiculous.
As has been noted by others on the newswire, a legal demonstration organised through the trade union movement and other voluntary bodies will attract far more people on to the streets than one organised in relative secrecy over the internet and deliberately intended to provoke the police. The best way to knock the steam out of any movement is to allow the forces of 'Law and Order' to scare people off with scare stories of widespread violence.
Inspite of what the more puritanical of the contributors to this discussion think, a sit down protest is not going to shake the state to its foundations, it's only going to cause a traffic jam at best. It's unfashionable to say this on Indymedia, by peoples real collective strength is still in their work place. It's there that they come face to face with the reality of capitalism red in tooth and claw. So I'll stick with my old fshioned and out moded forms of struggle and leave the heroics to my youngers, and evident betters.
I hope you both have a nice time.
eric the red
So You think Road-Blocs are Stale!
04.04.2002 01:19
The piqueteros are organised locally with a general assembly in which all active members participate. Once a road artery is designated, the assembly organises support within the barrio. Hundreds of women, men, and children participate in the blockade, setting up tents and soup kitchens at the side of the road. If the police threaten the protests, hundreds more pour in from other barrios close by.
If the government decides to negotiate, the movement demands that the meetings take place with all the piqueteros at the blockade. The collective assembly makes decisions at the site of the action. From experience, the piqueteros distrust sending delegates, even well known militants, to negotiate with the government, because they can be bought off with a job. When a victory is won, the distribution of jobs takes place by collective decision according to prior criteria of family needs and active participation in the blockades.
The road blockade tactic is the functional equivalent of workers laying down the tools of production. They paralyse the circulation of goods, both inputs for production and outputs destined for domestic or overseas markets. They are an inspiration to other workers, showing that it is possible to fight unemployment by direct action even in difficult circumstances.
No War But the Clas War
You are stale, not the tactic!
04.04.2002 08:51
If you are happy to be a big fish in a tiny pond, that's fine: but for the movement to succeed the pond needs to be huge and you won't contribute to its growth by constantly carping from the sidelines.
eric the red
eric the reds justifications
04.04.2002 17:15
furthermore, we have a case of 'he who commends himslef , condemns himself... he who excuses himself, accuses himself" we heard about the wombles episode from many sources, but pyrrhic (rather than nice) to hear it from the SWP themselves...
acorn tributor
MAD - mutual assured destruction?
09.04.2002 12:27
So we have two sides with very different tactics fighting each other.
On the one hand the 'anarchist' 'ourmayday' camp with 10 days of activities and four main un-authorised actions/protests on mayday itself, on the other Globalise Resistance (+TUC) with the traditional legal trade union march and rally at Trafalgar square.
The 'ourmayday' website has a whole page devoted to slagging off Globalise Resistance and attacking some of its senior people as 'class traitors' and does not provide a link to their website or the tuc website and does not include details of the legal union march and rally. The Globalise Resistance website carries details of the union march and does not link to the ourmayday site or provide details of any of the many 'ourmayday' protests. This is a crazy situation! Both groups should trust their people (and new visitors to the websites) to make their own minds up, so both groups should be linking to each other even if there is animosity.
At the same time both groupings appear to be talking to the press and being critical of the other instead of talking about issues - a good example of this is the article in the Independent by Steve Boggan who spoke to globalise resistance and union organisers and produced an anti anarchist article: see
Now it strikes me that this approach is pretty damaging to all involved. What's wrong with having a diversity of tactics? If people want to go an a critical mass protest or a carnival action in soho that's up to them, if people want to feel safer they can go on the trade union 'legal' march and rally. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT? Some groups will be marching about Palestine (Stop the war coalition will also be joining the trade union rally) as well as many international groups - if they want more protection for themselves by going to a legal event WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT?
Mayday should be ALL OUR days together!
sort it out!