Skip to content or view screen version

cia planning major operations in London

alternet | 24.03.2002 17:59

!

Next Stop, Londonistan
Patricia Zengerle, TomPaine.com
March 21, 2002

It's Friday evening and the faithful stream from the city's mosques, a few whose famous imams draw thousands to hear fiery speeches condemning Americans and Jews.


As an American woman abroad, with fresh memories of the events of September 11, it is somewhat chilling to be caught unexpectedly in the sea of white-clad worshippers, all of them, apparently, male.


Not even one other woman -- in western garb or wearing a headscarf -- is in sight as the crowds jostle, heads down as they rush through the dusk to home and dinner.


The streets are lined with restaurants and small businesses, among them Islamic bookshops selling tapes made by some of the better-known imams, or Muslim religious leaders.


One local Muslim cleric, Abdullah el-Faisal, was arrested by anti-terrorist police on charges he made race-hate speeches urging followers to kill Jews and non-believers. Tapes of his sermons -- one title is "No Peace with the Jews" -- are sold openly in Islamic bookshops for the equivalent of about $2.80 each.


Newer tapes, released since September 11, instruct Muslim males to train for battle, promising 72 virgins in Paradise to those who die in holy war.


At another mosque complex near the city is a training ground said to be the site where dozens of Muslim men have learned how to assemble AK-47s and other military tricks before heading to Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban.


These crowded streets are not in Karachi or Kabul. They are nowhere near President George W. Bush's "axis of evil". They are in a city some anti-terrorism investigators have dubbed 'Londonistan,' the thriving militant Islamic community in and around the capital of Tony Blair's Britain, Washington's closest ally in its war on terrorism.


Experts on international terrorism say the heartland of violent Islamic extremism is now none of the official fronts of the war on terror. They say its center is Western Europe -- mainly, but not exclusively, Britain, which granted asylum to a stream of Muslim militants during the 1990s and where the tradition of freedom of expression that once sheltered Karl Marx has now extended to the widespread, and very open, cause of jihad.


Islam is the fastest-growing religion here -- with 1.5 million to 2.5 million adherents -- many of them immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh and many critical of extremism. But experts say there are two groups of Britons particularly drawn to militant Islam. One is young, generally single Muslim men of Asian descent who are angry over unemployment and racism and who put religion above country. Society here remains wary of foreigners, with newspapers and pub conversation filled with talk of "asylum-seekers" -- many of them Muslims -- blamed for a litany of social and economic problems.


"Politicians should really take note," said Barnie Choudhury, a commentator on the BBC's Radio Four, recounting how young Muslims in Britain expressed envy of those who have died in Afghanistan.


"One thing you cannot take away from, what appear to be ordinary Muslims, is their right to believe. And this, along with their anger, is their common and driving force. Remember the old soldiering wish for volunteers rather than conscripts.


"These young men assure me they are not members of any radical groups. They do not see themselves as supporting terrorism. They see themselves as fighting for their religious freedom."


The others most drawn to Islam are western converts who, in a nation where attendance at Christian churches has dropped dramatically, look to Islam for direction in their lives and offer recruiters an easily exploited mix of zeal and ignorance, experts said. One of these converts was Richard Reid, also known as Abdul Ra'uff, a former small-time crook now infamous as the "shoe bomber" who tried to blow up an American Airlines flight to Miami. Reid had converted to Islam in prison.


Reid belonged to the U.K.-based militant group al-Muhajiroun, which seeks to make Britain an Islamic state. "Al-Muhajiroun has one goal," Anjam Choudry, its U.K. chairman, told the Observer newspaper. "We would like to see the implementation of the sharia law in the U.K. Under our rule this country would be known as the Islamic Republic of Great Britain." Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, founder of al-Muhajiroun, sparked outrage after September 11 by urging young Muslims to go fight for the Taliban. Some senior politicians responded by saying that any Britain who fought against the country's troops should be prosecuted for treason.


Al-Muhajiroun also described Blair as a "legitimate target" because of his support for the U.S. campaign to oust the Taliban.


Militant Islamists who have spent significant time in London include Zacarias Moussauoi, a Frenchman detained in Minnesota and charged with complicity in the September 11 attacks, Djamel Beghal, another Frenchman held for his alleged role in a plot to blow up the U.S. embassy in Paris, and Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, commonly known as Sheikh Omar, the prime suspect in the kidnapping and murder of U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl.


Sheikh Omar was born and educated in London. He had been indicted in the United States in connection with the 1994 kidnapping of four Westerners, including an American, in India, even before Pearl's death.


Police estimate that al Qaeda has recruited about 200 Britons. At least five Britons are in U.S. custody at the Guantanamo Bay Naval base in Cuba and at least 20 are believed to have been killed by U.S. bombing in Afghanistan.


Osama bin Laden's links to Britain are so strong that he maintained an office in London for most of the 1990s, named the Advisory and Reformation Committee.


In February, the Guardian newspaper said it had seen documents from Spain, Italy, France and Germany showing that most of the known attacks planned or executed by al Qaeda in the past four years had links to Britain.


British security sources dispute the report.


"All the clues lead to London. All the roads lead to London," a senior German intelligence officer told the newspaper.


A mosque in Finsbury Park in north London has become particularly well-known. Moussaoui was a regular there, along with other named al Qaeda operatives, such as Beghal and probably Kamel Daoudi, also being held for alleged involvement in the Paris embassy plot.


Nizar Trabelsi, a Tunisian former professional soccer player now being held in Belgium, who is alleged to have been the designated suicide bomber in the Paris-embassy plot, is also thought to have frequented the mosque.


In February, the Observer, citing intelligence sources, said hardline Islamists had practiced with Kalashnikov AK-47s at the Finsbury Park mosque, where hardline cleric Abu Hamza often leads prayers. Hamza, who was born in Egypt and lost an arm and an eye in Afghanistan, is wanted in Yemen on terrorism charges. Britain has refused his extradition.


One of his fatwas, or edicts, praised assassinations including those of prominent Middle East figures and a two-year-old Algerian child. After his sermons, followers used buckets to collect donations for Egyptian Jihad.


MI5, Britain's domestic intelligence, says its agents have reported that scores of Islamic extremists had been sent from the mosque for training in Afghanistan. Feroz Abbassi, a computer engineer from Croydon in south London, who is now held at Guantanamo Bay, was "indoctrinated" at the mosque, according to his parents.


The list of names goes on -- another fiery local cleric, Abu Qatada, has been named in American court testimony as a member of al Qaeda's fatwa committee. He disappeared from his home in west London around Christmas, just before he could have been detained under antiterrorist legislation Britain introduced after September 11.


So what does Britain, which lost hundreds of citizens in the World Trade Center collapse, make of this?


Scotland Yard has said an estimated 100 individuals with links to bin Laden are based in the country. The agency has detained dozens under the toughened anti-terrorism laws.


Many here are angry, asking why the government had failed to act. "Why didn't Britain crack down on the enemy within?" was the headline of one critical editorial in the Yorkshire Post. Despite concern from rights groups, there has been little public opposition to the new laws making it easier to crack down on militants.


There was local fury when a few Muslims demonstrated happily after the September 11 attacks and again when 200 Muslim protesters chanted anti-western slogans and burned pictures of Blair and Bush after U.S. warplanes began bombing Afghanistan.


"That is not the real Britain," I was assured repeatedly.


Blair has done his best to convince skeptics that Britain's alliance with the United States is in the country's best interest. And he has assured Muslim leaders that that alliance is not a threat to Islam.


That message may not be easy to get across.


A BBC poll in November showed that 80 percent of British Muslims believed the U.S. attacks on Afghanistan were wrong. It said 57 percent of the 500 surveyed did not agree with Blair's contention that the war in Afghanistan was not a war against Islam. Thirty-four percent agreed with him.


And a full one-quarter said they supported British Muslims who had gone to Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban.


The events of the last sixth months have only further alienated segments of the community already deeply divided from the British mainstream. Two cities in northern England were shaken by race riots between whites and Asian Muslim youths in July, weeks before the September 11 attacks.


Things may get worse in the months ahead.


As U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney toured the Middle East in March sounding out Arab leaders about a possible U.S. attack on Iraq, Britain's Home (Interior) Secretary, David Blunkett, warned Blair's cabinet that military action against Saddam Hussein could provoke serious civil disorder in Britain.


Some Muslim leaders agreed, saying that Muslim radicals, already frustrated over Afghanistan, would only become angrier -- and perhaps more alienated -- if Britain backs another campaign against a Muslim state.


Patricia Zengerle is a reporter and editor who has worked in New York, Pittsburgh and Miami and now lives and works in London.


alternet

Comments

Hide the following 18 comments

Scapegoating Islam

24.03.2002 20:49

What do you expect British Muslims to do? Join the UK armed forces and go bomb what's left of their families in Iraq and Afghanistan? Britain has declared a racist war on Islam, they are entitled to defend themselves, as Palestinians are forced to do, under illegal Israeli occupation. If the CIA, with the full complicity of the Bush Administration, had not attacked their own citizens on September 11th, to blame Islam, we would not be on the brink of a 'New World War,' and Islamists would not be seeking Martyrdom, at our expense.

America, do you feel proud of your handiwork abroad?

Mos - sad


"British"

24.03.2002 20:53

First you say they're "british", then you say "you can't expect them to fight for Britain". Hmm, interesting. Why don't you just say they're Muslims living in Britain, which is what they view themselves as as well. They don't have any loyalty to Britain.

Jack


"British"

24.03.2002 20:53

First you say they're "british", then you say "you can't expect them to fight for Britain". Hmm, interesting. Why don't you just say they're Muslims living in Britain, which is what they view themselves as as well. They don't have any loyalty to Britain.

Jack


"British"

24.03.2002 20:54

First you say they're "british", then you say "you can't expect them to fight for Britain". Hmm, interesting. Why don't you just say they're Muslims living in Britain, which is what they view themselves as as well. They don't have any loyalty to Britain.

Jack


No more anti-Muslim shite

24.03.2002 22:49

Your article is "politely" worded anti-Muslim hate speech.

Has it never occurred to you that the CIA may have known about the planned 11 September 2001 having received warnings from German, Russian and Israeli intelligence services, but decided to let it happen to advance US economic and military interests in the world (for the US war is an extension of economic policy by other means)? In the tried and tested strategy of tension, Muslims have become the new post-Cold War enemy.

WHY ARE THESE ARTICLES APPEARING ON INDYMEDIA? Indymedia has been set up to cover social, environmental and anti-capitalist actions and ideas, not to provide room for bigots and racists like you. So stop spamming this site.

Publica


imuk spammed

24.03.2002 22:55

imuk is currently being targetted by a BNP member - jko, John, Jack whatever. It's unfortunately a waste of time to oppose. You wont change the views. Just make sure you've got a firewall established if you're going to challenge or probably best to just ignore - they'll go into the hidden files sooner or later

dh


Re:Jack Fighting for Britain

24.03.2002 23:19

Like millions of Muslims I was born in Britain, but I am a Christian. I don't support this 'War against Terrorism' (based as it is on the beginings of the establishment of a 'New World Order'), does this mean I am a 'Christian living in Britain'? I suggest you re-examine the racist roots of your flawed logic. To my Muslim brother Mos-sad, please don't think that the idiot Jack and others like him represent a majority view. What we are witnessing is the begining of a new age of persecution of any group that opposes this 'New World Order'(see Bush snr+jnr, Blair et al). Freedom is worth fighting for.

Yossarian


tompaine.com

24.03.2002 23:55

Oh by the way = looked at this site - couldn't find any evidence of this kind of rascist shite there - it may well be a right anarchist site - such is the American style of things - but there is a kind of right-wing anarchism that despises the KKK and American Nazi perspective that's being repeatedly posted here

dh


"British"

25.03.2002 01:00

Ask any real Muslim, especially a young one, if he thinks he's British, and the chances are he'll tell you he's not, and that he's a "Muslim living in Britain". They have absolutely no loyalty to Britain whatsoever, they only say they're British when they need help or want something. They're taking advantage of our kindess. I have every sympathy with the Palestinians battling out a very just cause, but I can't help thinking as well as pulling the plug on Israel and Saudi Arabia we should be tackling these people at home to properly solve the problem. They need to be told they can never claim this for their Islamic state, many think they can, they should be told otherwise.

Jack


"British"

25.03.2002 01:00

Ask any real Muslim, especially a young one, if he thinks he's British, and the chances are he'll tell you he's not, and that he's a "Muslim living in Britain". They have absolutely no loyalty to Britain whatsoever, they only say they're British when they need help or want something. They're taking advantage of our kindess. I have every sympathy with the Palestinians battling out a very just cause, but I can't help thinking as well as pulling the plug on Israel and Saudi Arabia we should be tackling these people at home to properly solve the problem. They need to be told they can never claim this for their Islamic state, many think they can, they should be told otherwise.

Jack


oh dear

25.03.2002 13:14

Jack is clearly a bit dim (as is anyone who claims to speak for 'us', 'them' etc., let alone any racist) but I'm worried that all the commentators here may have missed the point of the posting.
my impression (maybe I'm wrong) is that whoever posted the piece under the heading 'CIA plannning action in London' was presenting the article as a piece of propaganda, 'softening up' public opinion for further political attacks members of Muslim communities in the UK.

You probably know that the US government has essentialy interned around a thousand Muslims and people of Arab descent with next to no public outcry until recently (the numbers maybe many more, they don't tend to inform anybody when people are 'disappeared' into US custody).

My impression is that this article is the kind of piece which stokes the prejudices of idiots like Jack while quietly de-sensitising the wider population to further war against the East and abuses of Arab and Muslim human rights in the Western bastions of Anglo-Saxon 'liberal democracy'.

in which case the posting here is intended as a warning, and the comments in response show how important it is to explain why you are posting something because there will always be racist idiots on the loose and unfortunately even the well-meaning can easily miss the point being made in the fog of confusion over the current messy state of the world. maybe I'm one of them - would the original poster care to clarify?

cheers

zedhead


JACK !

25.03.2002 13:55

Personally, I do not look at religious or ethnic groups and ask them to explain their loyalties. That is to assume the role of an Immigration & Nationality official, which I am not.

A Triffid


Anarchy in the UK?

25.03.2002 16:50

I was under the impression that this was an anarchist (or at least far-left) site, so Jack must be the heralded BNP man. Part of anarchism is freedom of anything minus violence, so Muslims don't have to be loyal to Britain any more than flying pigs of the RAF need to be loyal to Saudi Arabia when they're there, or indeed that anybody needs to be loyal to any state.

Pearly Spencer
mail e-mail: orang2@aol.com


problems caused

25.03.2002 18:28

If they have no loyalty to us, it's perfectly possible they might well (and many do) have loyalties to forces which oppose us. Don't get me wrong, I'm very cynical about the recent war on Israel's enemies, but these people do have a beef with the west in general and may decide to take advantage of their location here. Also, many subscribe to the literal statements in the Koran that say that western Europe has been promised to the Muslims. Being part of western Europe, can we really afford to have so many fanatics hidden among the bulk of the Muslim population, who literally believe they can turn Britain into one of their wonderful Islamic republics? (Such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Northern Nigeria, Kuwait, Iran, Sudan, etc). Most people would shudder to think what it'd be like to subject to backward Sha'ria law and Islamic customs in a secular post-Christian nation like ours. The riots in Oldham, wrongly named race riots, were more to do with Islamic extremism than many commentators will let on. Testament to that is the fact that Hindus and Blacks were also attacked by the Muslim youths. Piling-up religious and ethnic problems on top of our existing ones is asking for trouble.

Jack


Hit the road

25.03.2002 20:12

Jack, do you seriously think that a group of 'hidden' muslim fanatics will rise up and take Britain as their own republic? Are you by any chance american?

Kieran


Not American

25.03.2002 20:50

As their numbers increase so will the pressure from them for increased representation. They already have their own parliament, albeit an unofficial one. With white British people set to be a minority in their own country by 2060 it's perfectly possible that the Muslim population, through high birthrates, suicidally lax immigration procedures, and conversions, would be high enough to start making major changes to the laws and practices in this country. Many Muslims themselves think they'll be able to take this country by 2025, I doubt it, but it could happen in future. Even if they're unable to, the large numbers of Muslims here are adding ethnic and religious tensions onto a growing list of problems. Look at Nigeria, Sudan, Yugoslavia, etc for examples of the problems of multicultural societies. Do we really need to take on this burden?

Jack


Jack off

26.03.2002 11:47

I've read that "white minority by 2060" line before.. in a BNP election leaflet! Jack's no master of disguise..

But hey, let's take up his challenge and look at Nigeria, Sudan, Yugoslavia. What do we see? Nationalist (racist) politicians seizing every opportunity to make people fear their neigbours, tearing apart communities with suspicion and hatred, dragging their countries down into civil war.

Is that what we want here? It's all the BNP can offer.

internationalist
- Homepage: http://www.anl.org.uk


Think again

26.03.2002 17:16

Your comment about the source of the accurate prediction for British whites being an ethnic minority is flawed. If you'll remember into last year, it was the office of national statistics which predicted this, and this prediction was published in the Independent and the Times. The BNP must have got this from one of these sources, because as far as I know they aren't rich enough to employ expert population statisticians like this government is. The flames of racial and religious tension might be fanned by certain politicians, but the fire itself is started within, it's perfectly natural for people to have these fears, most of them are well founded. What we see in these multicultural societies all over the world is violence, they nearly always go down the path of tyranny, whether the government is one that encourages it, or discourages it using Nazi-like techniques that the ANL favour. But one question you avoided was, WHY DO WE *NEED* THIS? We don't. Don't tell me it's to support our ageing population because who'll look after the immigrants when they get old? Yet more! It's a vicious and unsustainable cycle. As a side note, the ANL are a front organisation for the Socialist Worker Party which want to legalise paedophilia as well as give the go-ahead to yet more importing of poverty from the 3rd world. They regularly burn the Union Jack at their meetings, which shows what they really think about Britain and the British people.

Jack