Sorry mysterio - this one has been well-mulled. The opinion of whatreallyhappened.com and vialls.com is that this piece is disinformation seeking to discredit the conspiracy approach in general. Check em out. However, I would still hold as a possibility the Top_View interpretation that the plane actually hit an adjoining helipad, and the destruction to the building was by explosive.It's all still open to doubt, and I think the most interesting factor to the story is that it was felt necessary (or for the purpose of discrediting a piece of disinformation) to publicly respond to an internet conspiracy theory with a bit of CCTV footage which does appear to show an airliner at ground level flying in to the building. Still a remarkable level of manoeuvre for Cessna-trained terrorists whose names dont appear on the flight manifests. I include the clearest link for the video of the crash.
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
a bit behind the times
12.03.2002 00:30
dh
hunt a hoax?
12.03.2002 01:00
dm
how many other rubbish stories are they relea
12.03.2002 16:47
UN