Skip to content or view screen version

USA tries to weedle its way out of threats to blow us all off the planet.

TweedleDee | 11.03.2002 00:31

...


 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&u=/ap/20020310/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_nuclear_11

Bush Team Defends U.S. Nuke Plans
Sun Mar 10, 3:34 PM ET
By SCOTT LINDLAW, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - President Bush's top foreign-affairs advisers say the United States must be prepared to use nuclear weapons to deter attacks involving weapons of mass destruction. But in an effort to ease alarm overseas, they said there were no plans to do so.


"We all want to make the use of weapons of mass destruction less likely," national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said Sunday. "The way that you do that is to send a very strong signal to anyone who might try to use weapons of mass destruction against the United States that they'd be met with a devastating response."

Secretary of State Colin Powell said the United States has never ruled out using nuclear weapons against a nuclear-armed enemy, a policy he said should have deter any would-be attacker.

"We think it is best for any potential adversary out there to have uncertainty in his calculus," Powell said.

Rice, Powell and military and congressional leaders were responding to weekend reports that the Pentagon has told Congress it is studying the possible use of nuclear weapons against countries that threaten the United States.

The classified "nuclear posture review" sent to Congress says the Pentagon is developing contingency plans for using nuclear weapons against countries that are developing weapons of mass destruction.

The report identified seven nations: China, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea , Russia and Syria.

On TV talk shows Sunday, administration officials sought to walk a line between asserting America's willingness to use nuclear weapons, and calming the public and allies troubled by suggestions the United States might be moving closer to employing them.

The issue was especially sensitive on a day when Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) was leaving on a 12-country tour that includes stops in a number of Arab states certain to be upset about the targeting of Iraq, Libya and Syria.

Powell said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that the report emerged from "prudent" planning that must "give some consideration as to the range of options the president should have available to him to deal with those kinds of threats."

"Right now, today, not a single nation on the face of the earth is being targeted by an American nuclear weapon on a day-to-day basis," Powell said.

"We should not get all carried away with some sense that the United States is planning to use nuclear weapons in some contingency that is coming up in the near future," he said. "It is not the case."

Powell acknowledged the military was considering whether to "modify or update or change" current nuclear weapons to meet new threats.

Rice said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that the report emphasizes efforts to make the use of nuclear arms less likely through improved intelligence and conventional weapons.

Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stressed that the report is "not a plan."

"This preserves for the president all the options that a president would want to have in case this country or our friends and allies were attacked with weapons of mass destruction, be they nuclear, biological, chemical or, for that matter, high explosives," Myers said on CNN's "Late Edition."

Sen. John Warner , R-Va., top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee , said he would ask the administration Monday to clarify its position. He and Sen. Joe Lieberman , D-Conn., a fellow committee member, painted the document as an outline of options for the president.

"Frankly, I don't mind some of these renegade nations (thinking) twice about the willingness of the United States to take action to defend our people and our values and our allies," Lieberman said.

But, he added on CNN: "It's very important for the American people or people around the world not to overreact to the news stories."

News of the report did trigger consternation and disbelief overseas.

Libya's African affairs minister, Ali Abd al-Salam al-Turiki, told reporters in Cairo he found the report hard to believe.

"I don't think this is true," he said. "I don't think America is going to destroy the world."

Dmitry Rogozin, a leading Russian lawmaker with close ties to the Kremlin, accused Washington of deliberately leaking word of the report to intimidate Russia.

"They've brought out a big stick , a nuclear stick that is supposed to scare us and put us in our place," Rogozin said on NTV television.

TweedleDee

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Cheney arrives Monday

11.03.2002 00:44

Dick Cheney, architecht of the most serious escalation of nuclear war, arrives in London tomorrow, according to US sources.

surviving


re: cheney

11.03.2002 01:06

Dickhead cheney just stepped off the plane in the UK earlier this evening.

23Starz


NUTCASE OUT OF CONTROL

11.03.2002 09:31

this world is full of bloody double standards
militarists seize control of nigeria and prevent free elections condemnation from so called democratic countries

Militarists seize control of free elections in US and introduce a military regime on the sly and not a word is uttered !

bouble bloody standards

BUSH is a nutcase him and his security advisors have completely lost the plot i thought that maybe entering a new millenium, the human race embittered by war of the previous millenia, would have strove for peace and a genuine Nwo that was inclusive of all nations and acknowledged our cultural differences and built bridges so that we may come together to preserve what remains of our once beautiful earth (talk about naive)(the biggest threat to mankind is not nuclear warfare but environmental warfare both naturally occuring and engineered (HAARP Project))it is time man came together to face the war ahead
The war for earths survival !!
Nuggett!

nuggett
mail e-mail: colinc125@hotmail.com


It is illogical

11.03.2002 17:40

What is it with these morons who believe that you can
use "deterrance" against foreign governments who are
totally willing to sacrifice the nation over which they
rule for their own interests? If the Iraqi government,
we are told, is so evil that it does not care about its
own people, it's not going to make much difference to
them to threaten to slaughter their people, is it?
In fact, it might save them the bother of doing it
themselves! Both the evil-axis and US governments
agree on one thing: they don't want anyone getting in
the way between them and the oil supply. The people
in the way are completely expendable.

goatchurch