Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

The E-Bomb

dh | 10.03.2002 01:59

The E-bomb

Due for testing by the US next year, the E-Bomb,-electro-magnetic pulse weapon burns out electrical components over a very wide area, thereby rendering the area electricity -less and with few vehicles still running- the principle was demonstrated in the film Small Soldiers. Such a weapon can also be fairly easily be constructed by a terrorist, or ascribed to a terrorist. This is a dispersed EM weapon.Tesla proposed a focussed EM device which would reduce a target to its component particles, over a long distance. Such would seem a reasonable answer to the collapse of the WTC towers.A centripetal vortex, sucking in the dust not releasing its energy until near the bottom of the disintegration in the form of billowing dust storms through the streets of Manhatten.

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Oh come on

10.03.2002 16:02

Y'know, I think that crashing two planes into it would have the same effect.

(or was it just coincidence that that happened as well?)

red'n'black

hard to believe

10.03.2002 17:03

Still hard to believe that after 6 months, there are still people who cling to the authorised version, particularly a 'red and black', who ought therefore to believe nothing the government tells him or her. No - the last thing to be expected is that 2 planes hit 2 similar buildings at completely different angles, the one loosing its payload of fuel directly in to the building, the other casting it out over the streets in a fireball. The second tower to be hit - in a corner -with little fuel left to 'melt steel' - was the first to fall. Both buildings fell neatly straight downwards, better than most chimney or apartment block demolitions you'll have seen.
What came down from the upper stories, was not the huge chunks of concrete and girders one might hane expected to topple causing mayhem and destruction over large parts of Manhatten, but mostlt fine dust and rubble. Plus, the lack of bodies (although they have supposedly just found a cache of body parts under some rubble) - over 2000 still missing.
You proclaim anarchist colours - can't be too difficult to consider that the state apparatus has perpetuated a lie.
Click link for futher.

another reason why the towers went straiught

11.03.2002 08:53

Because the strongest part of the building was the outer walls, with a lack of internal support beams, the path of least resistance was through the middle, thus causing the towers to collapse vertically

David C

UK Indymedia