Skip to content or view screen version

Urge the Nobel Institute to reject the Bush/Blair Peace Prize Nomination!

Charles W. Johnson | 15.02.2002 05:25

They say that satire died when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, but if a Right-wing Norwegian MP has his way, the Nobel committee will be spitting on its grave. Norwegian MP Harald Tom Nesvik nominated Tony Blair and George W. Bush for the Nobel Peace Prize for "decisive action against terrorism, something I believe in the future will be the greatest threat to peace."

We are counting on you to spread the word for us! Please forward this message to any friends, family, colleagues, bulletin boards, listservs, or web pages that would be concerned about this issue.


TAKE ACTION! Protest the Nomination of George W. Bush and Tony Blair for Nobel Peace Prize

http://www.eskimo.com/~cwj2/actions/bushblairnobel.html

They say that satire died when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, but if a Right-wing Norwegian MP has his way, the Nobel committee will be spitting on its grave.

Harald Tom Nesvik, a member of the Norwegian Parliament from the Right-wing Party of Progress, has nominated U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair and U.S. President George W. Bush for the Nobel Peace Prize for "decisive action against terrorism, something I believe in the future will be the greatest threat to peace." According to the provisions of Nobel, the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Tony Blair has ordered more military actions than any U.K. leader since World War II, with at least one military action every year since 1998. George W. Bush has urged budgets massively increasing the size and funding of the U.S. standing military, continued and deepened U.S. military aid for the on-going civil war in Colombia and Israeli military occupation of Palestine, and initiated a war not only against Afghanistan, but an undefined, open-ended "War on Terrorism" which administration officials daily threaten to expand to other nations such Iran, North Korea, and Iraq. Vice President Dick Cheney told the Washington Post that the campaign of warfare the President has launched "may never end. At least, not in our lifetimes." Both Bush and Blair have refused to work with multilateral consultation and diplomacy through peace congresses, with Bush's refusal to secure UN Security Council approval before initiating the war in Afghanistan, and Blair's refusal to place the British troops occupying Sierra Leone under the command of United Nations Peacekeeping forces.

Urge the Nobel Institute to reject the nomination of Tony Blair and George W. Bush. Reckless and ever-expanding pursuit of war is not peace, and awarding the Peace Prize for massive world-wide military campaigns would be a slap in the face of peace and justice activists world wide.

For more Bush and Blair's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize, see:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,645075,00.html

To take action, go to:
http://www.eskimo.com/~cwj2/actions/bushblairnobel.html

Charles W. Johnson
- e-mail: cwj2@eskimo.com
- Homepage: http://www.eskimo.com/~cwj2/actions/bushblairnobel.html

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Explosive situation

15.02.2002 12:21

Peace is war in the New World Order, so they deserve this title more than anyone else. They have blackmailed the World and deserve recognition for it. Lets hold them up as an example of what peace means. Peace is multinational monopolies, land-mine exports, drug and armament deals, new weapons systems, surveillance, dams, power plants and environmental destruction and the total compliance of native populations, or genocide.

Alfred Nobel


the Nobbled prize

15.02.2002 15:19

actually, if the Nobel prize committee want to discredit themselves like this, you could argue the case for leaving them to do it. dont forget alfred nobel used the profits from hid dynamite invention to fund the prizes anyway. he was probably sincere in his belief that dynamite could be humanitarian, but then so is blair with his warmongering. o dear.

bookworm


Nobel and dynamite

16.02.2002 13:01

Actually, Nobel established the Nobel Peace Prize because he felt guilty about having invented explosives.

It was genuinely meant as a peace prize and not a war prize.

It's interesting now though that the Nobel peace prize has come to actually mean the Nobel war prize - like something out of George Orwell's 1984, where the Ministry of Love is actually the ministry of hate.

Fucking hell man, how can you nominate someone for a peace prize, for declaring war?!

Terrence and Philip


A further suggestion for nomination

16.02.2002 13:31

I can't understand why they would stop at Bush and Blair. Surely by these criteria, we should be nominating Ariel Sharon too! Someone should suggest this.

rikki